Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Trillions or Billions to North Korea

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Real Reality



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:22 am    Post subject: Trillions or Billions to North Korea Reply with quote

Another W5 Trillion to Be Poured Into N.Korea
The government wants to give North Korea another W5.25 trillion (about US$5.25 billion) in aid over the next five years.
Chosun Ilbo (November 1, 2005)
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200511/200511010022.html

According to the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy in South Korea, the North spends 14.4% of its national budget on its army, at one million strong the world's third biggest.
Sanctions would be an act of war, Pyongyang says
Jonathan Watts, The Guardian (January 8, 2003)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,870603,00.html


Last edited by Real Reality on Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rapier



Joined: 16 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"sanctions would be an act of War".

ie: If you stop giving us enough food and cash to keep our hell continuing, we'll attack you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Real Reality



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

extortion or coercion or blackmail
extort
To obtain from another by coercion or intimidation.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=extort

Still at war?
It should be noted that, technically, North and South Korea exist without a formal peace treaty and thus are still officially at war despite the 1953 ceasefire that ended the Korean War. Both governments still maintain that they are the sole government of Korea, and no official recognition has been made by either side of the opposing government.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_Korea#Still_at_war.3F

Technically still at war, but the two Koreas move ever closer
BO-MI LIM IN SEOUL
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1794782005
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Real Reality



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Government Appropriates 450 Billion Won for North Korean Aid
The Unification Ministry announced that it would appropriate 450 billion won from.... The Ministry originally planned to secure a total of 1.1 trillion won for the 2006 Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund from the government's budget,...
Donga.com (November 3, 2005)
http://english.donga.com/srv/service.php3?biid=2005110342488
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Moldy Rutabaga



Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Location: Ansan, Korea

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And look at all the tangible benefits in peace and prosperity it has brought to the Koreas!

Quote:
Sanctions would be an act of war, Pyongyang says

Not giving us stuff would be an act of war, Pyongyang says
Not saying nice things about us would be an act of war, Pyongyang says
Not eating more bran and sweatin' to the oldies would be an act of war, Pyongyang says

What isn't an act of war for those jerks?
Ken:>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vlcupper



Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moldy Rutabaga wrote:
And look at all the tangible benefits in peace and prosperity it has brought to the Koreas!

Quote:
Sanctions would be an act of war, Pyongyang says

Not giving us stuff would be an act of war, Pyongyang says
Not saying nice things about us would be an act of war, Pyongyang says
Not eating more bran and sweatin' to the oldies would be an act of war, Pyongyang says

What isn't an act of war for those jerks?
Ken:>



Kissing and/or wiping Lil' Kim's ass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
tzechuk



Joined: 20 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One word: ridiculous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigBlackEquus



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Location: Lotte controls Asia with bad chocolate!

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, they (SK's) are blinded by their own ambition to be a world power. They'll sell their own country out to NK, in the desperate hope that they will soon join and become a world power. They hate being one of the little nations of the world, and see their hope of becoming a respected world power only possible if they are united with the North.

Everyone here must realize, just by living here, that the SK people would sell out the USA in a heartbeat based on bloodlines.

The odd thing is that they do so with some blind future ideas based on a life where Kim Jong Il isn't in power.

Does anyone here actually think that KJI would just give NK to the South for their own use?


By the way, it kind of makes the money spent by the US in Iraq look small when you compare budgets, doesn't it? Does this mean that, perhaps, the US really isn't spending a lot of money there, and that the media has blown the issue way out of proportion?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, it just makes the amount of money from South Korea look even more ludicrous.

Though I do believe that in today's world sanctions are counterproductive in helping to overthrow a dictatorship, you have to extract concessions for what you do give them. Steps toward reform and openness, etc. Otherwise it's obvious you're only maintaining the status quo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rapier wrote:
"sanctions would be an act of War".

ie: If you stop giving us enough food and cash to keep our hell continuing, we'll attack you.


Soon you can add power to that equasion. Man, this administration is digging a hole so deep we might never get out of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
soviet_man



Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The point many people overlook with this type of argument, is that the ongoing survival of the DPRK does NOT rely on the ROK (or anyone else) contributing money to it.

It is a complete falsehood to think that the DPRK would suddenly collapse (economically, politically) if external financial contributions were to cease (which they won't).

If anything has emerged in recent debate, it is that Kim Jong Il is in a stronger position now - than 12 months ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aid with the right conditions attached would bring this regime down. For example if the South would give food only through the World Food Program, which demands its inspectors have access to ensure the food isn't being sent only to the military and elites to ensure loyalty. KJI is using food as a weapon against his own people. The more more we force him to open up his country, the more interacions the people there will have with outsiders, and the more they will realize they will never be free or prosperous with him in charge.

This type of no-strings aid strengthens KJI immensely, because he can spread it around to only the military and those who are loyal to him. There's a province in the northwest of the country (sorry I can't remember the name) in which the people are getting no food because they're considered disloyal. This is a regime that will have to collapse from the bottom up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International