View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PatrickSiheung

Joined: 21 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 5:36 am Post subject: Using "a lot of" with countable nouns... |
|
|
Just today I was teaching a grammar lesson and a student came up with a sentence "I have a lot of assignments." I didn't sound right to me, so I asked her to change it to "I have many assignments." Then I told them that "many" sounds better with countable nouns.
Of course, another student insisted that you could use "a lot of" with any countable noun.
All I could say was that although many people may talk that way, "many" sounds much better.
I liken it to the use of "look what I've got," rather than "look what I have."
I'm wondering if it's just the way I speak, or if there is a hard-and-fast rule for the use of "a lot of" and "many." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gypsyfish
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing wrong with a lot of. It's less formal, so in some situations a person might not want to use it, but generally, no problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denverdeath
Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: Boo-sahn
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the student's sentence was fine.
I have a lot of pickles on my plate. I have many pickles on my plate. A lot of pickles are in the bowl. Many pickles are in the bowl. I would use either and say that both are correct. I also think that "I have money," "I've got money," and "I got money" are all okay although the third one sounds a little awkward. Being from Canada, I tend to use both American and British forms. I think the "I have got" is more British sounding. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickSiheung

Joined: 21 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really? I was raised to never say "I have got." I had it drilled into me so many times that it hurts my ears when someone says it now. lol.
Okay, thanks guys. I'll have to tell that student it's just a matter of preference. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Your student is right. You are wrong.
At least in terms of formal grammar: "many" and "much" are to be used in questions and negative statements; "a lot of" is to be used with positive statements of both countable and uncountable nouns. A hundred old grammar books say so, as do several ESL teaching texts sitting on my shelf.
Of course, common usage varies.
But basically, your student has better grammar than you. That's the fact jack! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ladyandthetramp

Joined: 21 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree completely with Van Islander.
I use "a lot of / lots of" for count and non-count. So does everyone I know. Using "many" or "much" when speaking in simple statements generally sounds strange (to me). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most of us are hired to provide conversational and pronunciation skills. Regarding those areas we are superior to Koreans.
But when it comes to English grammar, a lot of Korean English students know more than most of us ever will.
We should AT LEAST be a bit hesitant before telling them how grammar should NOT be.
I learned my lesson the hard way. In Canada I never heard anybody say "at the weekend". When I first came to Korea I thought of it as a wrong use of a preposition, until I noticed its British, Australian and New Zealander usage. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah. It should be "a lot of assignments" or "lots of assignments", "scads of assignments", "oodles of assignments", or the more visual "I've got assignments up the butt", but not "many assignments". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gypsyfish
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
denverdeath wrote: |
I think the student's sentence was fine.
I have a lot of pickles on my plate. I have many pickles on my plate. A lot of pickles are in the bowl. Many pickles are in the bowl. I would use either and say that both are correct. I also think that "I have money," "I've got money," and "I got money" are all okay although the third one sounds a little awkward. Being from Canada, I tend to use both American and British forms. I think the "I have got" is more British sounding. |
The third one is past tense, the other two aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jacl
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
gypsyfish wrote: |
denverdeath wrote: |
I think the student's sentence was fine.
I have a lot of pickles on my plate. I have many pickles on my plate. A lot of pickles are in the bowl. Many pickles are in the bowl. I would use either and say that both are correct. I also think that "I have money," "I've got money," and "I got money" are all okay although the third one sounds a little awkward. Being from Canada, I tend to use both American and British forms. I think the "I have got" is more British sounding. |
The third one is past tense, the other two aren't. |
Yes. It's just that in "I got money" some (or most) people imply it in the present tense. This is wrong. Totally. It's "I have money" Sometimes "I've got money" seems acceptable, but it really isn't proper. It's like saying "I have have money" or "I got got money", etc.
"I got money" can seem more acceptable when it implies (or states) that I got money before (so I can afford it or I can pay, etc.)
"I have got" or "I have gotten" have the same meaning and are both acceptable as past participles (or whatever you call it). Like "I have got/gotten money in the past/before". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jacl
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's another debate with "a lot", but it's a waste of time.
"a lot" is fine and easy to use for "much" or "many". Students should be commended for using it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree. Given the problem students have using 'much' and 'many' correctly they'd be better off using 'a lot of' or 'lots of' as a default. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Given the problem students have using 'much' and 'many' correctly they'd be better off using 'a lot of' or 'lots of' as a default. |
I'm with Privateer. In fact, I tell my students to use 'a lot of/lots of' if they can't figure out 'much/many' because it will always be correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickSiheung

Joined: 21 May 2003
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks a lot guys. Although a tad harsh, you taught me something today lol. I'll owe that student an apology next week.
And since I'd rather not make a mistake like that again in the future... anyone know of any good sites explaining English Grammar for teachers? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
plattwaz
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Location: <Write something dumb here>
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not the original topic, but this has come up in the thread so....
Using "have got" is the norm in British English, and although to North American ears it sounds wrong, it is not incorrect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|