|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: Top 100 Americans / Top 10 ? |
|
|
Atlantic a few months ago published a comprehensive list from academics of the Top 100 Americans of all time.
Here is the Top 20 (below). What surprises you? who else should be there? Who should be higher? Why?
To see the whole list of 100, go to
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200612/influentials
Surpise for me was that Kennedy (both) was not there nor in the top 100. Farnsworth as the inventor of the TV should have been there, wasn't. Also, I think Franklin should be the boss, the top honcho. Further, why not Einstein? Is this xenophobia? He did get American citizenship, didn't he? And he didn't make the top 100...
Hamiliton? I think he should be out of the top 20.
| Quote: |
1 Abraham Lincoln
He saved the Union, freed the slaves, and presided over America�s second founding.
2 George Washington
He made the United States possible�not only by defeating a king, but by declining to become one himself.
3 Thomas Jefferson
The author of the five most important words in American history: �All men are created equal.�
4 Franklin Delano Roosevelt
He said, �The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,� and then he proved it.
5 Alexander Hamilton
Soldier, banker, and political scientist, he set in motion an agrarian nation�s transformation into an industrial power.
6 Benjamin Franklin
The Founder-of-all-trades� scientist, printer, writer, diplomat, inventor, and more; like his country, he contained multitudes.
7 John Marshall
The defining chief justice, he established the Supreme Court as the equal of the other two federal branches.
8 Martin Luther King Jr.
His dream of racial equality is still elusive, but no one did more to make it real.
9 Thomas Edison
It wasn�t just the lightbulb; the Wizard of Menlo Park was the most prolific inventor in American history.
10 Woodrow Wilson
He made the world safe for U.S. interventionism, if not for democracy.
11 John D. Rockefeller
The man behind Standard Oil set the mold for our tycoons�first by making money, then by giving it away.
12 Ulysses S. Grant
He was a poor president, but he was the general Lincoln needed; he also wrote the greatest political memoir in American history.
13 James Madison
He fathered the Constitution and wrote the Bill of Rights.
14 Henry Ford
He gave us the assembly line and the Model T, and sparked America�s love affair with the automobile.
15 Theodore Roosevelt
Whether busting trusts or building canals, he embodied the �strenuous life� and blazed a trail for twentieth-century America.
16 Mark Twain
Author of our national epic, he was the most unsentimental observer of our national life.
17 Ronald Reagan
The amiable architect of both the conservative realignment and the Cold War�s end.
18 Andrew Jackson
The first great populist: he found America a republic and left it a democracy.
19 Thomas Paine
The voice of the American Revolution, and our first great radical.
20 Andrew Carnegie
The original self-made man forged America�s industrial might and became one of the nation�s greatest philanthropists. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| So blatantly elitist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
So blatantly elitist.
|
There are 300 million of us living now. Just because you are not in the top 20 doesn't make the list elitist. You came in at # 26. That's nothing to be ashamed of.
Lincoln and Washington should be reversed.
Jefferson, Roosevelt and Hamilton should be farther down the list.
Franklin should be up at #3. We are the result of his dream. And he was a pretty cool dude. Had he not already been 70 when independence was proclaimed and 82 when the Constitution was adopted, he would have served as a president.
LBJ should be partnered with Martin Luther King, Jr. Right now, his failure (Vietnam) overshadows his historic accomplishments. With time, that perception of him will surely change.
Madison should be moved up.
Reagan only deserves a spot on the list of traitors to the nation. You can't turn the world's major creditor into the world's largest debtor and still claim to be great unless you redefine great.
Thomas Paine certainly made vital contributions with his "The Crisis" and "Common Sense" but he wasn't an American. I know a certain nationality claims anyone who took a vacation or changed their shoes inside their borders is one of 'theirs', but I don't think we have to do that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| At a minimum, John Calhoun should be out, and Eugene V. Debs should be in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:59 pm Post subject: Re: Top 100 Americans / Top 10 ? |
|
|
| ddeubel wrote: |
Hamiliton? I think he should be out of the top 20. |
Then you obviously have no sense of history and absolutely no idea what Alexander Hamilton did. In short, he basically set up the entire financial system of the then new United States.
Here, take a look at this website:
http://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/Com2000/0600.htm
There are reasons why his face is on the $10 bill. Let me guess, you want Slick Willy's face on there, right?
I'd go with Ronald Reagan, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Reagan as Top-20 of greatest Americans? Nixon in the Top-100?
There's that Mormon founder Smith but no Ayn Rand. Why not? Such a yahoo list anyways.
Needed some women so from #30 to #42 they threw in four women reformers and Rachel Carson. All political.
Where the hell is Helen Keller? One of the greatest Americans for sure!
And where's Clara Barton, who only set up the Red Cross.
No Pocahontas or Sacajawea, okay. But where's Geronimo or Tecumseh?
No athlete except oldtime baseball players Babe Ruth and Jackie Robinson? Jackie instead of Muhammad Ali?? No Mildred (Babe) Didrikson Zaharias.
Margaret Mead for sure but Betty Friedan? No female novelists like Cather or Edith Wharton, just politically-inclined folk.
Elvis Presley and Louis Armstrong. Dang, they got their musicians right! Can't argue with those two.
Disney and Goldwyn, yeah, makes sense as creators/polito types. No actors on the list. Perhaps that's the way it should be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
freethought
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. i think calling this list elitist is hilarious--- it's a list of the most 'elite' americans in history... OF COURSE it's elitist.
2. Grant shouldn't be on there. And if he is on there, than so should IKE. Ike, though not the greatest president, had a far more successful two terms in office than grant and also played an important military role. He also defined the US-Soviet arms race.
3. Reagan should NOT be in there. I was at a small gathering about a year ago where Colin Powell was the guest speaker. He was very forth coming when speaking and the one thing he seem to be saying was that Reagan was first cousin to the scarecrow in the wizard of Oz. On top of that. Most of the documents that have been released seem to back that perception up. It will be very interesting to see the 'true' picture when all the reagan stuff is declassified 40 years from now.
4. Henry Ford. No way he's not top 20, and I don't even like the guy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oprah Winfrey and Rosa Parks have been Great Americans, haven't they? (you judgemental elitist you!)
Neil Armstrong and Vince Lombardi?
Billy Graham and Bob Hope?
The list IS elitist, with some token African Americans and women, as per the academic elite from which half the top-100 list was formed.
I still don't understand how Helen Keller doesn't make a Top-100 list of Greatest Americans! unless the list is meant to be political and elitist |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
ddeubel wrote:
Hamiliton? I think he should be out of the top 20. |
| Quote: |
Then you obviously have no sense of history and absolutely no idea what Alexander Hamilton did. In short, he basically set up the entire financial system of the then new United States.
Here, take a look at this website:
http://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/Com2000/0600.htm
There are reasons why his face is on the $10 bill. Let me guess, you want Slick Willy's face on there, right? |
Well, I disagree with the whole notion of "face value" and currency. But especially so in the case of Slick Willy.
I do think that Hamilton merits attention and there is a BIG arguement for his inclusion in the top 20. No doubt. But my personal view is different and doesn't preclude a "sense of history".
I just don't like the man, his personality, vanity and airs. Elitist and furthest away from what I believe Republican should mean. I've read his letters to Washington and they stink. The Federalist papers he wrote are did much to help ratify the constitution but many things in his writing of them stink. They stink of elitism and I'm sure he'd of wished to wear a crown and swing a mace. Slavery is another issue which shows his hypocricy.
Further, he was a bad shot. Backstabber and cruel on a personal level. He also made no attempt to stop America from becoming a nation of politicos that profit through power. He certainly profited and made no qualms about it.
As for the treasury, his war contributions and his fiscal policy, I agree they are high achievements.
That's my view.
DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ddeubel wrote: |
| Quote: |
ddeubel wrote:
Hamiliton? I think he should be out of the top 20. |
| Quote: |
Then you obviously have no sense of history and absolutely no idea what Alexander Hamilton did. In short, he basically set up the entire financial system of the then new United States.
Here, take a look at this website:
http://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/Com2000/0600.htm
There are reasons why his face is on the $10 bill. Let me guess, you want Slick Willy's face on there, right? |
Well, I disagree with the whole notion of "face value" and currency. But especially so in the case of Slick Willy.
I do think that Hamilton merits attention and there is a BIG arguement for his inclusion in the top 20. No doubt. But my personal view is different and doesn't preclude a "sense of history".
I just don't like the man, his personality, vanity and airs. Elitist and furthest away from what I believe Republican should mean. I've read his letters to Washington and they stink. The Federalist papers he wrote are did much to help ratify the constitution but many things in his writing of them stink. They stink of elitism and I'm sure he'd of wished to wear a crown and swing a mace. Slavery is another issue which shows his hypocricy.
Further, he was a bad shot. Backstabber and cruel on a personal level. He also made no attempt to stop America from becoming a nation of politicos that profit through power. He certainly profited and made no qualms about it.
As for the treasury, his war contributions and his fiscal policy, I agree they are high achievements. |
See, these were the top 100 MOST INFLUENTIAL not the ones that agree with you or with your lefty buddies.
Just remember, when you start spewing about elitism, that Hamilton lived in the 19th century, not now. Things were a whole lot different back then. I'd almost be willing to bet another month's salary that you wouldn't even like Geo. Washington if you had the chance to go back and meet him. Take the emotional component out, DD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1896-Samuel Clemens learns that Hellen Keller (whom he had met two years earlier) has lost financial support for her education, and asks Henry Huttleston Rogers, vice president and director of Standard Oil to help her attend Radcliffe College. Rogers does so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| 1896-Samuel Clemens learns that Hellen Keller (whom he had met two years earlier) has lost financial support for her education, and asks Henry Huttleston Rogers, vice president and director of Standard Oil to help her attend Radcliffe College. Rogers does so. |
Their actions being ordinary of those already in a position of power.
Keller was a great person, a testament to the best in the very identity of what it is to be American. As she said: "Although the world is full of suffering, it is full also of the overcoming of it." and "Never bend your head. Hold it high. Look the world straight in the eye." One of the greatest heroic figures in world history, hence why I learned of her in my Canadian elementary school education, and why my Korean students are taught about her in their schools as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Some of you need to improve your reading skills, including the OP. The list describes the "most influential," not the "top" or "best" or "greatest." Otherwise LBJ would not be on the list since his Vietnam legacy almost cancelled out his Great Society efforts. The latter, by the way, were as much the work of Hubert Humphrey and others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Some of you need to improve your reading skills, including the OP. The list describes the "most influential," not the "top" or "best" or "greatest." Otherwise LBJ would not be on the list since his Vietnam legacy almost cancelled out his Great Society efforts. The latter, by the way, were as much the work of Hubert Humphrey and others. |
And some need to improve on their thinking skills.
Please tell me what makes you an authority on what "influential" means? It could mean many, many things and is one of those neutral words that is in the mind of the beholder. Could mean affecting the future. But then, it could be a negative or positive influence. Hitler certainly was influencial. Also could mean, no cancelling out, seeing the term is not of one comportment or the other. Your example of LBJ then doesn't hold. Influencial could also mean "known", meaning, influencing through example many, many people. Not defined as you seemingly wish, as meaning, influencing power/development/programs and physical things.
Who is the most influencial on Dave's Current events forum? Most posts? Best thinker? Loudest and most raucous? The mods who control things? Those who make the most new posts? Who.....????
Big and wide ranging word. Multifaceted. I think you have to use your own dictionary a little less and see things less subjectively.
DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChimpumCallao

Joined: 17 May 2005 Location: your mom
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The #1 spot should be given to Dr. Normal Borlaug, father of the green revolution. That stupid list seems to take fame into account more so than actual greatness.
Boulag is responsible for saving the lives of a BILLION people with his research in genetic food crops. He lived with people in Mexico and India and helped them raise their crop yields and came up with new types of wheat and rice in Mexico and China. He worked tirelessly and came up with amazing innovation, and all for a good and noble cause.
It's disgusting he is not recognized nor mentioned. He did more than the whole 100 list put together.
A BILLION PEOPLE didn't starve because of his research and hands on help. The man needs a spot on the list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|