|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:58 am Post subject: Munich: Spielberg's finally made a great political statement |
|
|
I strongly advise seeing this while it's still playing. After the sappy and painfully obvious patriotic points Spielberg made in D-Day, I went to this film with very low expectations. What emerges is a very thought-provoking, heart-wrenching, and nuanced saga that sends mixed messages but nevertheless demonstrates very clearly how violence begets violence. There are a few somewhat preposterous scenes, but by-and-large it is what I suspect was very close to the truth, especially for the agents working the case. In the end the hero finds out the truth of his being: for him being a good Jew is far more important than being a good Israeli. It's the type of realisation I wish more nationalists would come to.
Do yourself a favour and go see it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rum Jungle
Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: North Asia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I found it a strange film. The Mossad hit team in scene after scene for almost 3 hours enjoying meals, laughing, bickering just like 5 male ESL teachers in Korea followed by scenes of incredible violence and mayhem. Unless that's what Spielberg was getting at- the banality of violence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have to agree, MUNICH is a pretty great film, and will possibly one day be regarded as a turning point in Hollywood's treatment of the middle east. One quibble:
Palestinian violence against Israeli civilians is portrayed visually in the scenes at the Olympic village and the German airport, and that's fair enough. However, Israeli violence against Palestinian civilians is only talked about(the 200 dead in the retaliation raid), never portrayed visually. So however balanced the script, the film as a visual experience is slightly tipped toward Israeli sympathies(though the final scene where the main character seems decidedly ambiguous about Israel should also be read into the record).
That said, yeah, a definite recommendation from me. I mean, how many films do you see these days where the characters sit around and discuss the tensions between European Marxists and national liberation movements? Maybe in 1960s Godard, but certainly not in 2006 Hollywood(or 2006 anywhere, as far as I can tell). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hollywoodaction
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
It was okay, but I wasn't impressed. For example, the whole safe-house scene where the main character has a discussion with a terrorists seemed a bit heavy-handed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Palestinian violence against Israeli civilians is portrayed visually in the scenes at the Olympic village and the German airport, and that's fair enough. . |
Is that fair enough??? A murderous rampage in the middle of what is supposed to represent universal respect and brotherhood?
If a bunch of Nunavut terrorists were to massacre a dozen or so Canadian athletes tomorrow in Torino, how would you feel? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is some of the terrorism LA-Spielberg left out....pre 67. Hollywood hates details, loves simplistic plot lines. spielberg buried himself with this film. And in addition there were more than 300 attacks on Isreal from 67-72. The Arabs just don't know how to lose.
Jan 1, 1952 - Seven armed terrorists attacked and killed a nineteen year-old girl in her home, in the neighborhood of Beit Yisrael, in Jerusalem.
Apr 14, 1953 - Terrorists tried for the first time to infiltrate Israel by sea, but were unsuccessful. One of the boats was intercepted and the other boat escaped.
June 7, 1953 - A youngster was killed and three others were wounded, in shooting attacks on residential areas in southern Jerusalem.
June 9, 1953 - Terrorists attacked a farming community near Lod, and killed one of the residents. The terrorists threw hand grenades and sprayed gunfire in all directions. On the same night, another group of terrorists attacked a house in the town of Hadera. This occurred a day after Israel and Jordan signed an agreement, with UN mediation, in which Jordan undertook to prevent terrorists from crossing into Israel from Jordanian territory.
June 10, 1953 - Terrorists infiltrating from Jordan destroyed a house in the farming village of Mishmar Ayalon.
June 11, 1953 - Terrorists attacked a young couple in their home in Kfar Hess, and shot them to death.
Sept 2, 1953 - Terrorists infiltrated from Jordan, and reached the neighborhood of Katamon, in the heart of Jerusalem. They threw hand grenades in all directions. Miraculously, no one was hurt.
Mar 17, 1954 - Terrorists ambushed a bus traveling from Eilat to Tel Aviv, and opened fire at short range when the bus reached the area of Maale Akrabim in the northern Negev. In the initial ambush, the terrorists killed the driver and wounded most of the passengers. The terrorists then boarded the bus, and shot each passenger, one by one. Eleven passengers were murdered. Survivors recounted how the murderers spat on the bodies and abused them. The terrorists could clearly be traced back to the Jordanian border, some 20 km from the site of the terrorist attack.
Jan 2, 1955 - Terrorists killed two hikers in the Judean Desert.
Mar 24, 1955 - Terrorists threw hand grenades and opened fire on a crowd at a wedding in the farming community of Patish, in the Negev. A young woman was killed, and eighteen people were wounded in the attack.
Apr 7, 1956 - A resident of Ashkelon was killed in her home, when terrorists threw three hand grenades into her house.
Two members of Kibbutz Givat Chaim were killed, when terrorists opened fire on their car, on the road from Plugot Junction to Mishmar Hanegev.
There were further hand grenade and shooting attacks on homes and cars, in areas such as Nitzanim and Ketziot. One person was killed and three others wounded.
Apr 11, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire on a synagogue full of children and teenagers, in the farming community of Shafrir. Three children and a youth worker were killed on the spot, and five were wounded, including three seriously.
Apr 29, 1956 - Egyptians killed Roi Rotenberg, 21 years of age, from Nahal Oz.
Sept 12, 1956 - Terrorists killed three Druze guards at Ein Ofarim, in the Arava region.
Sept 23, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire from a Jordanian position, and killed four archaeologists, and wounded sixteen others, near Kibbutz Ramat Rachel.
Sept 24, 1956 - Terrorists killed a girl in the fields of the farming community of Aminadav, near Jerusalem.
Oct 4, 1956 - Five Israeli workers were killed in Sdom.
Oct 9, 1956 - Two workers were killed in an orchard of the youth village, Neve Hadassah, in the Sharon region.
Nov 8, 1956 - Terrorists opened fire on a train, attacked cars and blew up wells, in the North and Center of Israel. Six Israelis were wounded.
Feb 18, 1957 - Two civilians were killed by terrorist landmines, next to Nir Yitzhak, on the southern border of the Gaza Strip.
Mar 8, 1957 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Beit Govrin was killed by terrorists in a field near the Kibbutz.
Apr 16, 1957 - Terrorists infiltrated from Jordan, and killed two guards at Kibbutz Mesilot.
May 20, 1957 - A terrorist opened fire on a truck in the Arava region, killing a worker.
May 29, 1957 - A tractor driver was killed and two others wounded, when the vehicle struck a landmine, next to Kibbutz Kisufim.
June 23, 1957 - Israelis were wounded by landmines, close to the Gaza Strip.
Aug 23, 1957 - Two guards of the Israeli Mekorot water company were killed near Kibbutz Beit Govrin.
Dec 21, 1957 - A member of Kibbutz Gadot was killed in the Kibbutz fields.
Feb 11, 1958 - Terrorists killed a resident of Moshav Yanov who was on his way to Kfar Yona, in the Sharon area.
Apr 5, 1958 - Terrorists lying in ambush shot and killed two people near Tel Lachish.
Apr 22, 1958 - Jordanian soldiers shot and killed two fishermen near Aqaba.
May 26, 1958 - Four Israeli police officers were killed in a Jordanian attack on Mt. Scopus, in Jerusalem.
Nov 17, 1958 - Syrian terrorists killed the wife of the British air attache in Israel, who was staying at the guesthouse of the Italian Convent on the Mt. of the Beatitudes.
Dec 3, 1958- A shepherd was killed at Kibbutz Gonen. In the artillery attack that followed, 31 civilians were wounded.
Jan 23, 1959 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Lehavot Habashan was killed.
Feb 1, 1959 - Three civilians were killed by a terrorist landmine near Moshav Zavdiel.
Apr 15, 1959 - A guard was killed at Kibbutz Ramat Rahel.
Apr 27, 1959 - Two hikers were shot at close range and killed near Massada.
Sept 6, 1959 - Bedouin terrorists killed a paratroop reconnaissance officer near Nitzana.
Sept 8, 1959 - Bedouins opened fire on an army bivouac in the Negev, killing an IDF officer, Captain Yair Peled.
Oct 3, 1959 - A shepherd from Kibbutz Heftziba was killed near Kibbutz Yad Hana.
Apr 26, 1960 - Terrorists killed a resident of Ashkelon south of the city.
Apr 12, 1962 - Terrorists fired on an Egged bus on the way to Eilat; one passenger was wounded.
Sept 30, 1962 - Two terrorists attacked an Egged bus on the way to Eilat. No one was wounded.
Jan 1, 1965 - Palestinian terrorists attempted to bomb the National Water Carrier. This was the first attack carried out by the PLO's Fatah faction.
May 31, 1965 - Jordanian Legionnaires fired on the neighborhood of Musrara in Jerusalem, killing two civilians and wounding four.
June 1, 1965 - Terrorists attack a house in Kibbutz Yiftach.
July 5, 1965 - A Fatah cell planted explosives at Mitzpe Massua, near Beit Guvrin; and on the railroad tracks to Jerusalem near Kafr Battir.
Aug 26, 1965 - A waterline was sabotaged at Kibbutz Manara, in the Upper Galilee.
Sept 29, 1965 - A terrorist was killed as he attempted to attack Moshav Amatzia.
Nov 7, 1965 - A Fatah cell that infiltrated from Jordan blew up a house in Moshav Givat Yeshayahu, south of Beit Shemesh. The house was destroyed, but the inhabitants were miraculously unhurt.
Apr 25, 1966 - Explosions placed by terrorists wounded two civilians and damaged three houses in Moshav Beit Yosef, in the Beit Shean Valley.
May 16, 1966 - Two Israelis were killed when their jeep hit a terrorist landmine, north of the Sea of Galilee and south of Almagor. Tracks led into Syria.
July 13, 1966 - Two soldiers and a civilian were killed near Almagor, when their truck struck a terrorist landmine.
July 14, 1966 - Terrorists attacked a house in Kfar Yuval, in the North.
July 19, 1966 - Terrorists infiltrated into Moshav Margaliot on the northern border and planted nine explosive charges.
Oct 27, 1966 - A civilian was wounded by an explosive charge on the railroad tracks to Jerusalem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
If a bunch of Nunavut terrorists were to massacre a dozen or so Canadian athletes tomorrow in Torino, how would you feel?
|
Uhh, I wouldn't like it very much, that's for sure.
However, if the Canadian government's response was to kill 200 people in Nunavut through aerial bombing, then that's something that I would certainly want the world to be aware of as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sundubuman wrote: |
On the other hand wrote: |
Palestinian violence against Israeli civilians is portrayed visually in the scenes at the Olympic village and the German airport, and that's fair enough. . |
Is that fair enough??? A murderous rampage in the middle of what is supposed to represent universal respect and brotherhood?
If a bunch of Nunavut terrorists were to massacre a dozen or so Canadian athletes tomorrow in Torino, how would you feel? |
I sure as hell wouldn't want the Canadian government to orchastrate the murder of hundreds of Nunavut civilians on native reservations, though there'd probably be a few Canadians who'd develop the same murderous, racist hatred that envelopes so many radical Zionists. Fortunately I think that the majority wouldn't tolerate a plan aimed to beget future violence that could be used to attempt to justify future ethnic cleansing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
soon...
with all those heart wrenching stories, one has to wonder how the Palestinians could claim any sort of moral justification for their behaviour.
Of course, I'd also like to hear what was happenning against Palestinians at the time JUST to compare notes... especially since your bias is blinding.
well, according to the media, Israel has, for the last 6 years been pummelled on and off by terrorist attacks.....
and yet..
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/ this is post 2000... Of course, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
I have to agree, MUNICH is a pretty great film, and will possibly one day be regarded as a turning point in Hollywood's treatment of the middle east. One quibble:
Palestinian violence against Israeli civilians is portrayed visually in the scenes at the Olympic village and the German airport, and that's fair enough. However, Israeli violence against Palestinian civilians is only talked about(the 200 dead in the retaliation raid), never portrayed visually. So however balanced the script, the film as a visual experience is slightly tipped toward Israeli sympathies(though the final scene where the main character seems decidedly ambiguous about Israel should also be read into the record).
That said, yeah, a definite recommendation from me. I mean, how many films do you see these days where the characters sit around and discuss the tensions between European Marxists and national liberation movements? Maybe in 1960s Godard, but certainly not in 2006 Hollywood(or 2006 anywhere, as far as I can tell). |
No he doesn't show Israeli helicopters murdering Palestinian children, but in some ways I think his approach works better. Everyone knows what's happening in Palestine, but they don't see it and don't want to see it, much like the audience. One agent knows exactly what's happening and what the real history is (the older guy who gets murdered by the Dutch woman) but is doing his job because he's hoping that he can help put an end to the problem - though he knows it might not work and is taking a gamble. Another (the guy with the English accent who's presented like he didn't even grow up in Israel) knows what's happening and likes it, but can't tolerate anyone facing him with truth that he's just as evil as what he claims to hate. Then there's the main character who thinks that righteous vengence can justify what he's doing, but in the end finds out that love of his family and inner righteousness are what make him Jewish, not having a 'Jewish' state that's 'free' to build highways across Palestinians' former olive orchards. All in all I think the ambiguity of what's actually happening in Palestine to fuel this all leaves the audience in a position of moral ambiguity - something refreshingly un-Hollywood. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
I have to agree, MUNICH is a pretty great film, and will possibly one day be regarded as a turning point in Hollywood's treatment of the middle east. One quibble:
Palestinian violence against Israeli civilians is portrayed visually in the scenes at the Olympic village and the German airport, and that's fair enough. However, Israeli violence against Palestinian civilians is only talked about(the 200 dead in the retaliation raid), never portrayed visually. So however balanced the script, the film as a visual experience is slightly tipped toward Israeli sympathies(though the final scene where the main character seems decidedly ambiguous about Israel should also be read into the record).
That said, yeah, a definite recommendation from me. I mean, how many films do you see these days where the characters sit around and discuss the tensions between European Marxists and national liberation movements? Maybe in 1960s Godard, but certainly not in 2006 Hollywood(or 2006 anywhere, as far as I can tell). |
Perhaps it's because our news is full of these kinds of events, and we've become numb to them.
(I know I have.)
So he tried to make the loss of life impactful by having the protagonists kill human beings whom he had begun to know as people.
- my 200 won worth |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
If a bunch of Nunavut terrorists were to massacre a dozen or so Canadian athletes tomorrow in Torino, how would you feel?
|
Uhh, I wouldn't like it very much, that's for sure.
However, if the Canadian government's response was to kill 200 people in Nunavut through aerial bombing, then that's something that I would certainly want the world to be aware of as well. |
I think you missed the point. The point is that there are no Nunavit terrorists. There is no movie to be made about how Canada killed 200 Nunavit(ians?) through aerial bombing because the Nunavits never aspired to slaughter 11 Canadian Olympians.
I don't recall Ghandhi's suicide bombing campaigns, nor can I remember when and where Martin Luther King advocated violence to solve the problem of inequality in the American South.
I'll admit I haven't seen the movie, and I don't care to (just as I didn't see Fahrenheit 911 or Mel's Passion movie), but I have heard that the 11 Israeli Olympians were hardly characterized nor was the impact on their families fleshed out, but you get extensive character development for the terrorists. And since I haven't seen the movie, I won't go on about how bad it is, because I really don't know. But if what I've been told is true, (and feel free to correct my ignorance) I have no desire to see it.
sundubuman wrote: |
Hollywood hates details, loves simplistic plot lines. spielberg buried himself with this film. |
Yeah, it seems Spielberg made a huge mistake with this film. And, no, Yu Bum Suk, I was not especially enamored of Saving Private Ryan, although I'll have trouble watching Schindler's List or ET again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On the other hand wrote:
Quote:
If a bunch of Nunavut terrorists were to massacre a dozen or so Canadian athletes tomorrow in Torino, how would you feel?
Uhh, I wouldn't like it very much, that's for sure.
However, if the Canadian government's response was to kill 200 people in Nunavut through aerial bombing, then that's something that I would certainly want the world to be aware of as well.
I think you missed the point. The point is that there are no Nunavit terrorists. There is no movie to be made about how Canada killed 200 Nunavit(ians?) through aerial bombing because the Nunavits never aspired to slaughter 11 Canadian Olympians.
|
No, but there probably is a movie to be made about how aboriginal people in North America engaged in violent warfare against white imperialists in the early days of colonization.
Quote: |
I don't recall Ghandhi's suicide bombing campaigns, nor can I remember when and where Martin Luther King advocated violence to solve the problem of inequality in the American South.
|
I also don't recall that the US government's response to Black Panther violence was to kill hundreds of people in aerial bombings of black neighbourhoods. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
On the other hand wrote:
Quote:
If a bunch of Nunavut terrorists were to massacre a dozen or so Canadian athletes tomorrow in Torino, how would you feel?
Uhh, I wouldn't like it very much, that's for sure.
However, if the Canadian government's response was to kill 200 people in Nunavut through aerial bombing, then that's something that I would certainly want the world to be aware of as well.
I think you missed the point. The point is that there are no Nunavit terrorists. There is no movie to be made about how Canada killed 200 Nunavit(ians?) through aerial bombing because the Nunavits never aspired to slaughter 11 Canadian Olympians.
|
No, but there probably is a movie to be made about how aboriginal people in North America engaged in violent warfare against white imperialists in the early days of colonization.
Quote: |
I don't recall Ghandhi's suicide bombing campaigns, nor can I remember when and where Martin Luther King advocated violence to solve the problem of inequality in the American South.
|
I also don't recall that the US government's response to Black Panther violence was to kill hundreds of people in aerial bombings of black neighbourhoods. |
No, I don't have a problem with a movie that fleshes out the horrors Israel has suffered on Palestinians. I have a problem with a movie that portrays terrorists with as much sympathy as Munich does. Whatever the subsequent actions of Israel, those 11 Olympians didn't deserve the empty portrayal Spielberg gave them, just as Israel's over-the-top response does nothing to excuse the actions of terrorists. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Whatever the subsequent actions of Israel, those 11 Olympians didn't deserve the empty portrayal Spielberg gave them, just as Israel's over-the-top response does nothing to excuse the actions of terrorists.
|
Well, I think it is generally assumed that the athletes themselves did not deserve to die. So Spielberg wouldn't really be breaking any new ground by making an extended argument for their humanity. Remember, the story is told more-or-less from the POV of the main assassin sent to kill the terrorists, and he doesn't seem to have had any contact with the atheletes at all. The focus of the story is his thoughts and feelings upon encountering the people he has to kill. So I'm not sure how the script could justify showing us lengthy scenes of the athletes acting like just regular folks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|