View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:03 pm Post subject: Dana Reeve, widow of actor Christopher, dies |
|
|
url=http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&pubid=968163964505&cid=1141733240990&col=968705899037&call_page=TS_News&call_pageid=968332188492&call_pagepath=News/News]Dana Reeve, widow of actor Christopher, dies[/url]
I had a massive amount of respect for Christopher Reeve, and just as much if not more for his wife who stuck with him through everything. Can you imagine what the 13 year old child must be going through right now? Just Christopher being paralyzed was bad enough, but then later dying early. And after that, his mother dying early too (less than 2 years later). My condolences go out to all the family, but I feel horrible for their son  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JAWINSEOUL
Joined: 19 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:37 pm Post subject: �� |
|
|
My purpose for responding is not to be argumentative or to belittle the effect her death on society.
That being said, I��m not particularly inclined to mourn her or Christopher Reeves death and more than that of a vagrant.
People use phrases like��.she was good person or he was caring. Why do people pretend to know the character or motives of television personalities? Most appearances made by celebrities are not only scripted but coached by PR professionals.
I may miss superman, and Jack Tripper, and Mr. Ferley (of which I posted a message), but this should not be any more pronounced that that of then the Death of Kenny from South park.
I do mourn the single human life that is lost, I ��I sure the people that know them and are related to them will miss them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:42 pm Post subject: Re: �� |
|
|
JAWINSEOUL wrote: |
My purpose for responding is not to be argumentative or to belittle the effect her death on society.
That being said, I��m not particularly inclined to mourn her or Christopher Reeves death and more than that of a vagrant.
People use phrases like��.she was good person or he was caring. Why do people pretend to know the character or motives of television personalities? Most appearances made by celebrities are not only scripted but coached by PR professionals.
I may miss superman, and Jack Tripper, and Mr. Ferley (of which I posted a message), but this should not be any more pronounced that that of then the Death of Kenny from South park.
I do mourn the single human life that is lost, I ��I sure the people that know them and are related to them will miss them. |
While I 100% disagree with you about these two people and your wonderful outlook on life, what about their son? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JAWINSEOUL
Joined: 19 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That was my point; people with personal interest in their life will miss them. There is a difference between feeling bad for a kid and mourning the parent��s death. And although I feel bad for the kid, he is one of millions of orphaned kids of which 99% who won��t make the press. He deserves no more pity or thought than those children.
TV is fake ��we need to stay in the real world. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm inclined to agree with Jawinseoul.
Car wrecks, other accidents, death from illness, even most murders, are personal/family tragedies. They are not news. News is something that affects a large number of people. Gossip, while it may be interesting, is also not news. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vox

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Location: Jeollabukdo
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Celebrities' misfortunes do get a disproportionate amount of public attention, but when they make their tragedy part of their public life as Christopher Reeve did with the issues surrounding research for nerve regeneration, they also serve to bring visibility to an issue. I side with the OP. This is one sad story that just tugs at the heart.
I heard or saw once on a documentary that there is a hospital in Israel where if you have had your back broken and are flown there within 14 days of your paralysis, they can actually fix it and you can walk again. Apparently they can't work with peope damaged beyond this length. If it's really true, I don't know why they aren't pressured to share their information with the world community. Maybe somebody has the specifics...? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 9:06 pm Post subject: *qkrdptmf* |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I'm inclined to agree with Jawinseoul.
Car wrecks, other accidents, death from illness, even most murders, are personal/family tragedies. They are not news. News is something that affects a large number of people. Gossip, while it may be interesting, is also not news. |
But while maybe Dana Reeve's death didn't, Christopher's did affect a lot of people. He was a champion for a lot of people. Yes, it took stardom for his message to get across, but it still got across. And it is still getting across, but not so much anymore without him. He was also a voice for stem cell research.
I am not a fan of Hollywood or professional sports, and think they should all be making 100000 a year at most, but Christopher Reeve was different than some average football player or Tom Cruise (and his wife with him). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Christopher Reeve's legacy was an extremely positive message of hope. He never gave up on being able to walk again, no matter what everyone else who knew better was telling him.
Celebrity or commoner or whatever else, I don't know of any other example such as his.
Dana Reeve's legacy was hardly less positive. She stood by her husband until the end, and that should not be dismissed as so common.
Together they left one hell of a research legacy behind them, as NPR reminds us, and we cannot yet judge how many people this legacy has impacted because it is ongoing...These are inspiring acts and examples of volition, by the way, that should not be dismissed simply because Christopher Reeve was famous in his time. Some of the people on this board are far too consumed by their antiEstablishment tendencies.
Click the link and listen if you have the time.
Quote: |
All Things Considered, March 7, 2006 � Dana Reeve, the widow of actor Christopher Reeve, has died of lung cancer at 44. Dana Reeve became an advocate in the quest for a cure for spinal-cord injuries after her husband was paralyzed in 1995. Melissa Block talks with Susan Howley of the Christopher Reeve Foundation. |
http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=2
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5250117 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChimpumCallao

Joined: 17 May 2005 Location: your mom
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the reason this is big news is because her husband was a famous guy who suffered from a horrible tragedy.
that said. it is a horrible thing, especially for their 13 year old son. to see both their parents die slow painful deaths must have been heartbreaking...and at that age a child really needs their parents. poor kid. really. famous, rich or whatever. i wouldnt wish that on anyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gypsyfish
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
JAWINSEOUL wrote: |
TV is fake ��we need to stay in the real world. |
Unlike the internet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reflections
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
So what? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
Christopher Reeve's legacy was an extremely positive message of hope. He never gave up on being able to walk again, no matter what everyone else who knew better was telling him. |
Or at least it was until he gave up on life when living became too hard. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|