Korean Job Discussion Forums

[igotthisguitar]

Why You Should Resist the National ID Card
Prison Planet | September 16 2005

This piece focuses on the introduction of the British national ID card but the same principles can be applied in any country.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2005/160905resistid.htm

1) A government engaging in escalating criminal actions and becoming more and more secretive should not be watching and tracking us as if we're all criminals. The same goes for CCTV surveillance. That's not freedom. Would you let a convicted murderer and pedophile watch your child 24/7?



The often peddled mantra of 'why should you care if you have nothing to hide?' is manifestly ridiculous in light of the fact that we have a government that has everything to hide and yet we're the ones under suspicion.

Should it concern us that our government shredded hundreds of thousands of documents before a 1st January Freedom of Information deadline? Why should the government care about freedom of information if they have nothing to hide?

But they did care enough to order this mass shredding.

We are told by the government to make our lives completely transparent or go to jail while the government itself becomes more secretive than ever before.

Why should they know everything about me when they won't tell me anything about them?

Would you walk up to a gang of criminals and give them your credit card and PIN number?

2) The government told us that the ID card would make our information more secure. Blair said this would protect, not infringe our liberties. And how did they propose paying for it? By selling the information of 44 million British citizens to private companies. How secure is that?

3) As a perspective on how governing powers use ID cards, consider the fact that residents of Fallujah in Iraq were finger scanned, given retina scans and ID cards just to be able to leave and enter the village. Every citizen is treated as a potential insurgent and is given an ID card. Is that how our government views us all, as potential insurgents?

So, what do you have to hide? is the wrong question. The question should be, why does the government need to know everything about me?

4) ID cards will not stop terrorism. Even the Home Secretary Charles Clarke admitted it after the London bombings. In addition, the Blair government has been caught faking terror alerts to push through increased power. Firstly in the case of the Ricin plot that never was and also an attack on Canary Wharf which was admitted to be totally scripted. Furthermore, the so-called London bombing mastermind was an MI6 asset.

Reams of evidence point to the bombings being an inside job, one of the purposes of which was making British people accept ID cards. Large scale terrorist atrocities worldwide always lead back to government perpetrators. In this instance it is important to recall Herman Goering's quote,

"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."



5) Top criminologists have gone public to say that ID cards will actually result in an increase in identity theft, not a decrease as the government claims.

6) The introduction of the national ID card is one step further towards the mandatory implantation of ID chips in all British citizens. Does this sound outlandish? Implantable chip technology has been in existence for a decade and discussions on ID chipping humans is in the news regularly. Tommy Thompson, the former Health and Human Services Secretary in the Bush administration, had a chip implanted and is now touring the country lauding the virtues of ID chips. During the the confirmation hearings for John Roberts Jr., George W. Bush's nominee for Supreme Court chief justice, Roberts was questioned by Senator Joseph R. Biden on whether he would rule against a mandatory implantable microchip to track American citizens.

7) The purpose of government is to serve the people, not control them. Any scheme of national registration is alien to the basic fundamental principles of a supposed free country.

----------------------------------------

Related: Say No To National ID

This great song from renowned British artist Ian Brown is a well crafted tirade against the introduction of national ID cards.

Related: http://www.no2id.net

Related: http://www.nocards.org/

[Hater Depot]

So I guess you refused to sign up for you ARC?

[Benbby]

In a letter this morning in the Vancouver Sun newspaper it said in the European Union all citizens have an ID card and consider it very useful. It is free, and if you don't want one you don't apply for one-but then you can't travel.

Don't all British citizens have an EU ID card?

[Wangja]

[canuckistan]

It all depends on what information is stored on a chip in the card, and if it can be read remotely ie: from a distance. There are too many creative ID thieves out there already scanning bank card PIN #'s, hacking into bank records (not that the banks generally publicize that) and going through the garbage to get someone's name, addy and social security # so they can apply for loans etc.
The ensuing loan default mess/bad credit record is for the victim to prove it wasn't them and clean up, by the way.

[igotthisguitar]

http://www.biometrics.co.uk/

Japanese House of Representatives clears bill
to fingerprint, photograph arrivals

Bill to fingerprint, photograph arrivals clears Lower House

The House of Representatives passed a bill Thursday to require fingerprinting and photographing of foreigners entering Japan as a measure to prevent terrorism.

Despite strong criticism from opposition parties, the Japan Federation of Bar Associations and human rights groups, including Amnesty International Japan, the majority of Lower House members voted for the bill.

The bill will be further debated in the Upper House and is expected to be approved by the chamber in the current Diet session due to end June 19.

With the revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Law, the estimated 6 million to 7 million foreigners entering Japan annually will be obliged to provide personal identification information in electromagnetic format, including fingerprints and photographs.

The collected personal information will be electronically registered and collated with a blacklist of data of past deportees and internationally wanted criminals.

Those who refuse to provide the data or people who are recognized as terrorists by the Justice Ministry can be deported.

The measure, however, exempts foreigners under age 16, ethnic Koreans and other special permanent residents, those invited by the government and people entering Japan for diplomatic or official purposes.

Lawyer Mitsuru Namba expressed concern over the bill, stressing it could lead to discrimination against foreigners.

"This is a measure to strengthen control and surveillance over foreigners," Namba said. "By targeting only foreigners, (this bill) could encourage prejudice and discrimination against foreigners, and I believe it could disturb the society in which we coexist with foreigners."

After Thursday's vote in a plenary session of the House of Representatives, members of the opposition parties told reporters they plan to continue arguing against the bill in the Upper House because there are too many vague points, including how the information will be preserved

"The problem (regarding this revision) is that it involves biometric information like fingerprints and facial photographs," said Democratic Party of Japan lawmaker Satoshi Takayama.

"People cannot change (this information) even if they wanted to. This is completely different from other personal information, like where you live or your bank savings. We believe that biometric information must be handled with extreme caution."

By MASAMI ITO
Staff writer
The Japan Times

http://www.findbiometrics.com/viewarticle.php?id=199