Korean Job Discussion Forums

[thepeel]

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/946

Sharon Dijksma, a leading parliamentarian of the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA) wants to penalise educated stay-at-home women. ��A highly-educated woman who chooses to stay at home and not to work – that is destruction of capital,�� she said in an interview last week. ��If you receive the benefit of an expensive education at society��s expense, you should not be allowed to throw away that knowledge unpunished.��

The intellectuals strike again!!

[Big_Bird]

[Ody]

good lord, BB. you are a beacon of common sense!





.

[thepeel]

[Big_Bird]

[thepeel]

Ah! A war! And this time with a girl!

You think of yourself as enlightened, don't you. Tried really hard in sociology class, right? Fancy yourself to be clever, or perhaps witty even. I disagree. Your answers are predictable and vapid. That is why I said you would be first, and how I know what your posts will say before I read them. I just ask myself, what would the PC Police say? Then I get your answer.

So, this woman, a "leading parliamentarian" should be ignored cause you say so. And to think otherwise is the product of a mentality of sexism, right? Uh hu. And I'm din for wanting you to elaborate (though not dim enough to put my uglyass fat feet on a friggen avatar). I like how you just toss aside stuff you want to go away. Just add to it a label, such as nutty bird, dim or whatever, and trust that you have done your job in keeping people quiet. Right?

And a masturbation reference. How clever. I see in other posts you also use the tools of feminist language fascism. Using the word "little" when talking about choices men make and such. So pathetic. You are very clever, aren't you. Well, you can't get to me. Especially with those gawddamned feet.

Try harder, sweetie.

[stat]

The politician's argument isn't so crazy. Don't some countries require their medical graduates to spend a stint working for the national health service? I forget the details.

Nothing wrong with politicians coming up with ideas and debating them.

BJWD, you seem to be getting a little worked up over this, you give the impression as though you're trying to push an agenda.

[thepeel]

[Ya-ta Boy]

[SweetBear]

Well, you can't get to me.
Try harder, sweetie

Uh, I think she did get to you sweetie

[thepeel]

[canuckistan]

[Nowhere Man]

Let's delineate here:

1) BJWD creates a thread with what can only be described as a trolling, inflammatory post.

2) Big Bird responds by calling the woman a "nutter". Is that a compliment? Is it defending this Dutch politician? No.

Rather, it's defending the OP's attempt to pidgeonhole "feminists" with his own base, close-minded, Rush Limbaugh-borrowed label.

3) In the ensuing argument, BJWD says that Big Bird is ignoring this woman to be PC, which ignores Big Bird's initial statement that she thinks she is a nutter because BJWD has already pre-drawn his conclusion.

4) Then we have this:

Quote:

It is crazy because it only applies to women. That is sexist. Do you think feminists would penalize men who want to stay home with the kids?

She only mentions punishing women, right? That IS sexist. It's certainly not "feminist" to advocate punishing women and not men.

Think about it, numbskull. She's making a blatantly chauvanist statement and you're blaming feminists? You're blaming the PC movement for a woman calling for punishment of women?

I'll agree with you, it's CRAZY.

5) Then you're attacking BB for her calling this woman a nutter.

6) You have made one of the silliest trolling posts I've ever seen on this forum and are essentially arguing with yourself.

Your argument boils down to this: a woman in the Netherlands is guilty of being a "PC feminazi" because she wants to punish women for not working more.

I applaud you for bringing to attention this clearly sexist policy. As Big Brd indicates, this thinking is wrong.

But more to the point, I applaud your thinking that your own thinking is wrong, even if you haven't come to grips with that yet.

[thepeel]

It is all in good fun, no?

[Nowhere Man]

Oh, your feminazi post was just kidding, eh?

Indeed.

Ah! A war! And this time with a conservanazi!