View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:17 am Post subject: Impeach THIS! |
|
|
I don't want to hear another freaking word about whether there is sufficient *evidence* to impeach Dumbya. (If you have ANYTHING to say on the topic as an AMERI-frican-CAN, it can ONLY be on the topic of whether his crimes rise to to the level of capital punishment.)
Sure, gooph, give me your best shot. I can take, and refute, everything and anything you've got. Be an AMERICAN first, and you'll have the same clarity of thought as some of the rest of us. To wit:
Papers: Cheney Aide Says Bush OK'd Leak
AP - 35 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney's former top aide told prosecutors President Bush authorized the leak of sensitive intelligence information about Iraq, according to court papers filed by prosecutors in the CIA leak case. Before his indictment, I. Lewis Libby testified to the grand jury investigating the CIA leak that Cheney told him to pass on information and that it was Bush who authorized the disclosure, the court papers say. According to the documents, the authorization led to the July 8, 2003, conversation between Libby and New York Times reporter Judith Miller
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/us/bush_administration
This is TREASON. There is no gray area here. GET IT???!!! No more freaking excuses from people scared of their own shadows... no more freaking excuses from people unwlling to take on the burdens of being a *free*, as much as possible, society.
Bush is a scumbag. He is Hitler in shorts. He is Beelzebub in lederhosen... but he is, without doubt, a scumbag.
Last edited by EFLtrainer on Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is the most useless rambling diatribe I believe I have ever seen.
Posting while drunk again? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
This is the most useless rambling diatribe I believe I have ever seen.
Posting while drunk again? |
Your life would be so much easier if so... Whose payroll are you on ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is painfully clear that you know exactly two things about this topic...jack and sh*t.
Let's see...the man who is actually indicted decides to blame someone(s) else. Gee, now that's a novel concept! You, of course, take it to the bank.
Maybe you should drink while posting from now on. You might make more sense and less a fool of yourself.
Let's take a straw poll here: Will DFLtrainer be consumed by his hatred of the President before said President leaves office in 2009? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
worst title to a thread ever.
And while I am happy that this puts the screws to Bush, I have to say EFLTrainer, your diatribe and rant undermines whatever valid argument you were trying to make. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Wise men:
And [BB] is dead right.- Kuros
Of course BB is dead right.- Mithridates |
And BB is right again on this thread. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Mon Jun 12, 2006 5:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinglejangle

Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Location: Far far far away.
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Wise men:
And [BB] is dead right.- Kuros
Of course BB is dead right.- Mithridates
And BB is right again on this thread.- Ya-ta Boy
BB is always on the money.- Gopher
BB's the Man. - Jinglejangle |
EFL, I forget, in which law of the USA which you're so fond of does it say that it's alright to convict someone on the testimony of one individual?
Is there some EFL trainer doesn't like him clause which I'm not familiar with? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Porter_Goss

Joined: 26 Mar 2006 Location: The Wrong Side of Right
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*Click*
Note to self, target one
Echo-
Fox-
Lima-
Tango-
Romeo-
Alpha-
India-
November-
Echo-
Romeo,
for immediate rendition.
*Click*
Last edited by Porter_Goss on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Buncha wimps. Got no cojones, gents.
First, this is not a court of law, it is a discussion board. Rules of litigation do not apply. A lawyer in the case, the judge in the case and the jury in the case are all rightfully bound to do their utmost to maintain innocence until proven guilty. I, on the other hand, am bound only to seek the best for my nation. I knew from the moment the issue came up that Bush and Cheney were involved. Provable? We shall see. But lack of proof does not mitigate reality. The tree falling in the forest still falls whether heard or not.
Second, the *alleged* behavior is absolutely consistent with the Bush administration's actions to date.
Third, you all got no cojones. Stay scared. Some of us stay vigilant. Stay PC. Some of us stay patriotic. Stay lapdogs. Some of us stay defenders of the Constituton. Stay as you are. Some of us seek what can be.
Last edited by EFLtrainer on Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Third, you all got no cojones. Stay scared. Some of us stay vigilant. Stay PC. Some of us stay patriotic. Stay lapdogs. Some of us stay defenders of the Constituton. Stay as you are. Som of us seek what can be. |
You sound like a right wing extremist- "If you don't agree with me you must be guilty of treason"
Wipe away that spittle, will you? You're starting to foam at the mouth.
Like BB, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but given your methods... as you say, this is a message board, and it would be embarrassing to validate this OP. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bulsajo wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Third, you all got no cojones. Stay scared. Some of us stay vigilant. Stay PC. Some of us stay patriotic. Stay lapdogs. Some of us stay defenders of the Constituton. Stay as you are. Som of us seek what can be. |
You sound like a right wing extremist- "If you don't agree with me you must be guilty of treason"
Wipe away that spittle, will you? You're starting to foam at the mouth. |
See above.
Yeah, I was wrong Bush would invade Iraq. I was wrong that his conservatism would damage the nation. I ws wrong that Iraq, once begun, would be a quagmire. I was wrong that invading Iraq would engender more ill for the US than good... ...and I was wrong in stating - months ago... that Bush and Cheney were in on Plame.
Yeah, I *never* know what I'm talking about. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
endofthewor1d

Joined: 01 Apr 2003 Location: the end of the wor1d.
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
The tree falling in the forest still falls whether heard or not.
|
i don't think anyone disputes that the tree actually falls. the question has always been 'if no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?'.
personally, i think it does. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Sun Jun 11, 2006 9:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
I knew from the moment the issue came up that Bush and Cheney were involved. Provable? We shall see. But lack of proof does not mitigate reality. The tree falling in the forest still falls whether heard or not. |
This is Stalinist.
I did a seminar in Soviet film/propaganda once, and there was this great film that ridiculed Stalin -- obviously a film from the 80s, and not earlier. Cannot recall its name or what its name was in English.
Anyway, "Stalin" had this scene where he was speaking to a crowd at Moscow about the alleged counterrevolutionaries in their midst. He said something pretty much like this:
"You will find that it is difficult to prove. It is like looking for a cat in a dark room that may or may not be there. But I swear to you we will find the cat in this room -- even if there is no cat." |
If there were no cat, you would be correct. Sadly, there is a cat. It may never be caught, but it's there nonetheless. Saying so is hardly Stalinist. Saying it is Stalinist to note there is a cat would, however, be Stalinist.
You poor scared folk. Please explain how the cat is ever found if noone ever acknowledges its existence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|