Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

I didn't sign on for this!
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Snowkr



Joined: 03 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:47 am    Post subject: I didn't sign on for this! Reply with quote

Hi everyone.

I like my school a lot. Let me just say that first. I work in a good hogwon. I know some of you may think that is an oxymoron.

The only thing I really don't like is that the age of our students seems to be younger than any of us ever expected because of the way they observe birthdays, lunar calendars... etc.

It was supposed to be students from ages 6 to 14. It's actually kids from 3 - 10.
How can you compare a 3 year old to a 6 year old? How is a 3 or 4 year old considered a 6 year old in Korea?
Today my co-worker had a child pee on her. Not sure how she feels but I wouldn't have taken this job 8 months ago had I known some of the kids would be barely past the toddler stage.

Any thoughts on this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Snow,

I understand what your going through. The first year I was here I taught kinder and preschool and just about pulled my hair out. The k classes weren't too bad, but the preschoolers drove me mad.

There was one little girl that pee'd on herself two times. Both times I went and got a Korean teachers. I usually just looked at the Korean teacher with that, "I'm not going to do it" face. Once the actual owner came in and helped because she was the only other person that could.

I definately agree with you, I didn't sign on to clean up kids piss and poop.

Thankgod those days are behind me. I have a nice quiet desk job. While it may be a bit boring at times, I don't miss having to deal with the little kids.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Golden Lama



Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Location: Left-of-Centre of the Universe

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this would make an interesting poll, no?

Have you ever been urinated and/or defecated on in class? Yes/No

My wife once had a kid explode in class - well, in the out-of-order bathroom attached to the class. She called her friend in to help out with the situation and they both cleaned up the mess with the exploder's own clothes. Luckily, she had a change of clothes.

Interestingly, the mother sent the child to school knowing that she had a bad belly and, hence, the extra clothes. You know, I've got a rule: Any child that might crap their drawers should stay home. Seems harsh, I know, but I'm a stickler.

Snow, this will all be a laughable story once you're finished this contract. If you're eight months in, start looking for an adults only/middle school student gig that's more to your liking.

One thing's for sure, when you're finished teaching kids you will miss them, but you'll be happy to miss them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
How is a 3 or 4 year old considered a 6 year old in Korea?


It's really a result of poor translation. Koreans count the number of years IN WHICH you have lived, not the number of years you have lived.

A kid born in December is automatically 1 and turns 2 on January 1.

If you really want to know how old a Korean kid is, you have to find out the birthday and calculate it yourself so you can estimate physical and mental development. [/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Snowkr



Joined: 03 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I should have known better than to believe that the children start at age 6. I lived in China last year and they do the very same thing.

The point of this post was not that a child peed on a teacher but that little children at this age are most definitely NOT 6 YEAR OLDS. I've known some 6-year olds to have accidents too.
The program at my hogwon is extremely rigid and there is NO KOREAN. I think it's unreasonable to put little 3 and 4 year olds into an environment where they have to behave like 6 or 7 year olds and to make them terrified to speak their native language in their own country!
While this structure and enforced rule of "no Korean" is nice for the foreign teachers, I think it's too harsh for the really young kids.
The Korean parents clearly don't object... I've seen them slap their toddlers around and shout at them like adults.

You're so right... I will be VERY HAPPY to miss this. Only 109 days left and counting them down!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomato



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some Korean directors don't seem to realize that different teachers are good for teaching different age groups.
My problem has been the opposite of yours:
I'm good for teaching little kids,
but I'm not macho enough for teaching older students.


Last edited by tomato on Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think I could have managed teaching the youngest level of kindergarden kids - especially when I first started teaching in Korea - if I didn't have a competent Korean co-teacher in the classroom with me - for translations, class-control, and taking them (without me...) to the rest room...

One time during an open-house presentation for parents, though, one of the four-year olds got too nervous during a song-and-dance routine, forgot his words, took a leak, and left with his mother (both crying...)

I've heard that in Japan mothers often bring their one-year old babies to hear classes - based on the theory that even the unborn child within the womb can learn (on some level...)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomato wrote:
Some Korean directors don't seem to realize that different teachers are good for teaching different age groups.
My problem has been the opposite of yours:
I'm good for teaching little kids,
but I'm not macho enough for teaching older students.


That's so true. If they see a market for mothers or for 3-year-olds they'll assume that whitey is up for the task. At my old hogwan there was a guy who was great with kindie kids but, from what I could gather, not very effective with middle schoolers and it just didn't occur to management to try to switch the classes around accordingly.

By far the biggest market in English hogwans is for little kids, as they have the most free time. It's a shame, because it's high schoolers who could really benefit the most from seeing a FT on a regular basis in small groups; instead they usually get shipped off to grammar teachers who do nothing but help prep them for their HS exams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Snowkr



Joined: 03 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks to all who contributed thoughts to this post!

Does anyone else out there think it's ridiculous to put 3 and 4 year olds in an English Immersion program and call them 6 year olds because they were born in the year of the pig (or whatever)?

They're babies. They belong at home with their parents!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Snowkr wrote:
Thanks to all who contributed thoughts to this post!

Does anyone else out there think it's ridiculous to put 3 and 4 year olds in an English Immersion program and call them 6 year olds because they were born in the year of the pig (or whatever)?

They're babies. They belong at home with their parents!


Well, its not ridiculous. It is their country, isnt it? Perhaps getting more acquanited with a culture before coming over would have helped.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Snowkr wrote:
Thanks to all who contributed thoughts to this post!

Does anyone else out there think it's ridiculous to put 3 and 4 year olds in an English Immersion program and call them 6 year olds because they were born in the year of the pig (or whatever)?

They're babies. They belong at home with their parents!


That has got to be the MOST ARROGANT crap I have heard so far on Dave's. Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

laogaiguk wrote:
Snowkr wrote:
Thanks to all who contributed thoughts to this post!

Does anyone else out there think it's ridiculous to put 3 and 4 year olds in an English Immersion program and call them 6 year olds because they were born in the year of the pig (or whatever)?

They're babies. They belong at home with their parents!


That has got to be the MOST ARROGANT crap I have heard so far on Dave's. Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes


It is. Another arrogant newbie bites the dust in Korea. I guess it mist be hard living in a totally different culture when one brings his western arrogance over here with them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jinju wrote:
laogaiguk wrote:
Snowkr wrote:
Thanks to all who contributed thoughts to this post!

Does anyone else out there think it's ridiculous to put 3 and 4 year olds in an English Immersion program and call them 6 year olds because they were born in the year of the pig (or whatever)?

They're babies. They belong at home with their parents!


That has got to be the MOST ARROGANT crap I have heard so far on Dave's. Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes


It is. Another arrogant newbie bites the dust in Korea. I guess it mist be hard living in a totally different culture when one brings his western arrogance over here with them.


I don't think it's an arrogant statement at all - it is ridiculous and, in most cases, a waste of money. It's also misleading for foreigners who aren't ready to teach ECE to be thrust into such an environment without knowing what they're getting into. Teaching age 6 and above is quite different from teaching age 5 and below.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
jinju wrote:
laogaiguk wrote:
Snowkr wrote:
Thanks to all who contributed thoughts to this post!

Does anyone else out there think it's ridiculous to put 3 and 4 year olds in an English Immersion program and call them 6 year olds because they were born in the year of the pig (or whatever)?

They're babies. They belong at home with their parents!


That has got to be the MOST ARROGANT crap I have heard so far on Dave's. Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes Shocked Rolling Eyes


It is. Another arrogant newbie bites the dust in Korea. I guess it mist be hard living in a totally different culture when one brings his western arrogance over here with them.


I don't think it's an arrogant statement at all - it is ridiculous and, in most cases, a waste of money. It's also misleading for foreigners who aren't ready to teach ECE to be thrust into such an environment without knowing what they're getting into. Teaching age 6 and above is quite different from teaching age 5 and below.


It is arrogant. Did you not catch the part about the year of the pig? That was the worst, as if all the people here are cavemen because they count ages different. He may have been saying it out of frustration which is somewhat understandable, but it was still arrogant. Plus, you do realize kids learn language best between the ages of 2 (or 3) to 6 (or 7) our ages? It's most definitely not a waste of money.

As for the being thrust into such an environment. That is what a brain is for. I am sorry, I have no pity for something that could have been checked quite easily. While I am sure the company withholds that info on purpose to be sketchy, but it's still up to him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomato



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I won't call Snowkr's post "arrogant crap" or call Snowkr an "arrogant newbie,"
but I would like to testify from teaching exactly that age group.
Until recently, I taught a group of four 4-year-olds.
I had a blast.
I learned a whale of a lot, and I hope that they learned a whale of a lot.
I wish I still had that class.

As for whether they can take an English immersion program or not, I never found out.
My Korean teaching opponent--I mean assistant--make sure that it never became an English immersion program.

Now for Snowkr's allusion to "the Year of the Pig."
I understood that as an allusion to Chinese astrology,
but I'm not sure that Laogaiguk did.
Laogaiguk seemed to understand that as a reference to counting newborns and one-year-olds.
I wouldn't say that astrology and the comparable pseudosciences are "ridiculous," but I suspect that they are wrong.
I plead guilty, because at one time, I swallowed all the occult nonsense hook, line, and sinker.

Now for the statement that "they belong at home with their parents."
A Suzuki violin teacher might agree with the last part, but not the first part. Suzuki advocated teaching the mommies along with the children.
That way, the mommies and the children could enjoy a musical environment together.

I wish Suzuki's counterpart could appear in the ESL field.
If we could bring the children's mommies into the classroom and persuade them to change all the �̸� �͡�s into come-here's and all the ������'s into stop-it's, that would do a world of good.

I would be the last to criticize a teacher for not fully appreciating all age groups.
As for me, I'd rather have toddlers weeweeing in my lap than to endure an adult conversation class any day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International