|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 9:31 am Post subject: Americans Abroad Get a Nasty Tax Surprise |
|
|
Americans Living Abroad Get a Nasty Tax Surprise
In an effort to raise revenues, tax writers in Congress added a last-minute provision that retroactively increased taxes for Americans living abroad. But the sudden imposition of new taxes has surprised overseas taxpayers, and it has employers concerned about the added cost....
The suddenness of the move meant that American Chambers of Commerce in Asia did not have a chance to mobilize against the idea as they had in previous sessions of Congress....
Americans living overseas say the provision wrongly focuses on allowances that their employers pay to cover higher costs -- like housing, schools and trips home -- that they incur by taking a job abroad....
Americans working overseas get a dollar-for-dollar credit for income taxes paid to foreign countries to offset their American income taxes. They also get to exclude $80,000 from the income they report to the I.R.S. The new law increased the exclusion to $82,400 this year.... But analyses by the accounting firms Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers show that by adding provisions to how the exclusion is calculated, it raises the overall tax bill and marginal tax rates as well for some overseas Americans....
By KEITH BRADSHER and DAVID CAY JOHNSTON, New York Times
May 30, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/30/business/30tax.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hater Depot
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Life just never gets easier for us international coke dealers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bush promises no tax increase
Drawing an unmistakable election-year line in the sand, US President George W Bush on Saturday challenged Democrats in Congress to raise Americans' taxes "over my dead body."... In doing so, he echoed 14 years later the famous promise made by his father "Read my lips: No new taxes" a broken vow that contributed to former President George Bush's reelection defeat.
The Daily Star (Volume 3 Number 833; January 07, 2002)
http://www.thedailystar.net/dailystarnews/200201/07/n2010705.htm#BODY18
Read His Lips: No New Taxes!
Economist's View (September 16, 2005)
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2005/09/read_his_lips_n.html
Bush: No new taxes needed to pay for recovery
Unnecessary spending must be cut, president says
The nation will "have to cut unnecessary spending," he said.
He added, "We should not raise taxes."
CNN.com (September 17, 2005)
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/16/bush.main/
Taxing Americans abroad
As an American resident in Italy for the past 26 years, I have the dubious privilege of being a citizen of the only advanced nation that taxes its own nationals living abroad ("Uncle Sam takes a bite out of expatriate incomes," May 27). On the other hand, I'm also a citizen of the only advanced country which, should I return home, will not offer me national health care.... Where's the upside in being an American? I don't see it.
by David Tabbat, Cernusco sul Naviglio, Italy
May 29, 2006
Editorials & Commentary - International Herald Tribune
Thailand's king, Taxing Americans abroad, Hillary Clinton
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/29/news/edlet.php
Bush Signs $70B Tax-Cut Package
Democrats Label Bill a Boon to Wealthy Americans
President Bush today signed a $70 billion, election-year tax-cut package, predicting it will bring a "strong lift" to the economy and "help millions of Americans who are saving for the future."
Republicans hope the legislation, which extends existing tax cuts on dividends and capital gains as well as changes to the alternative minimum tax, will give their party a boost heading into the midterm congressional elections in November.
"Today's really a good day to be a millionaire, but it's a bad day if you want to be a millionaire," Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) said at a news conference minutes after Bush signed the bill. "That's because President Bush just signed with the stroke of a pen a bill that sealed the fate of those trying to get ahead."
By Bill Brubaker, Washingtonpost.com (May 17, 2006)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051701277.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AbbeFaria
Joined: 17 May 2005 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is this only if you're working for an American company and you're living abroad, or just a blanket thing no matter what?
�S� |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
AbbeFaria wrote: |
Is this only if you're working for an American company and you're living abroad, or just a blanket thing no matter what?
�S� |
In an effort to raise revenues, tax writers in Congress added a last-minute provision that retroactively increased taxes for Americans living abroad.
Americans Living Abroad Get a Nasty Tax Surprise
By KEITH BRADSHER and DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
Published: May 30, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/30/business/30tax.html
Uncle Sam takes a bite out of expatriate incomes
By Sharon Reier, International Herald Tribune (MAY 31, 2006)
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/26/news/ataxes.php |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 8:21 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
What it essentially means is that the IRS is going to be looking at benefits and factoring them into your $80,000 deductible.
Probably not a worry for English teachers.
And, sorry to defend Bush, but the deductible has been raised to $82,000, most likely to head off such criticism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
U.S. executives warn expatriate tax increase may backfire
Merrill also said that he could "see no deep tax policy reason for this change," which he characterized as a way to raise money from one group of taxpayers to offset cuts for others. Other tax experts said they concurred in that assessment.
... the new rules will push many Americans overseas into higher brackets, he said, many companies will spend $2 for each $1 their overseas employees pay in taxes.... Some experts also questioned whether the new measure would generate the tax revenues anticipated by Congress. If companies bring Americans home or some of those overseas renounce their citizenship, the revenue estimates will not hold.
The law may also encourage more tax evasion, especially by Americans who work for foreign employers, who do not pay taxes in the United States and thus may not file tax documents with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
By Keith Bradsher and David Cay Johnston The New York Times
WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 2006
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/25/business/tax.php
Bush promises no tax increase
Drawing an unmistakable election-year line in the sand, US President George W Bush on Saturday challenged Democrats in Congress to raise Americans' taxes "over my dead body."... In doing so, he echoed 14 years later the famous promise made by his father "Read my lips: No new taxes" a broken vow that contributed to former President George Bush's reelection defeat.
The Daily Star (Volume 3 Number 833; January 07, 2002)
http://www.thedailystar.net/dailystarnews/200201/07/n2010705.htm#BODY18
Read His Lips: No New Taxes!
Economist's View (September 16, 2005)
http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2005/09/read_his_lips_n.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 10:00 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
OK. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
AbbeFaria wrote: |
Is this only if you're working for an American company and you're living abroad, or just a blanket thing no matter what?
�S� |
Blanket I would suppose. I seriously doubt this is going to affect any American ESL teachers. Your first $82K is tax free. You'd have to do a helluva lot of privates and yet you believe in being entirely honest with the IRS. That may well describe no one in Korea.
What's mostly happening is they're taxing benefits like housing/education allowance. We do get a housing allowance here that would be subject to tax if hagwons were paying $77,000 a year...
The tax rule I think was set up to make sure companies couldn't help their top execs avoid tax by claiming they worked for a branch in a low tax region. 80K in the early 90s might have been "sea-level" (CFO, CIO, CTO) pay but these days that's mid-career stuff for many professions.
It's a bit like the huge trouble people got into during the stock options days. Stock options used to be, again, stuff given to sea level types and a way to shelter income. The government introduced a minimum tax (AMT) that could be triggered by exercising your stock options ("buy and hold").
For example, you get 15,000 options at a strike price of $1. You decide to buy the shares. You hand over $15,000. However you choose to not sell the shares at market price (say $100 a share) because ... (I forget why people other than Canadians in America did this). Anyway, you buy your options and hold them (under the belief, obviously they'll be worth $200 next year). Although your bank account is $15,000 lighter and you have some slips of paper with a theoretically value, the IRS treats this as income if it's over a certain amount. The IRS declares the market value of the shares as actual income (or something like it), even though you didn't sell them.
So the government says "Okay your 15,000 shares were worth $1,500,000 at the time you bought and held. So you made $1,500,000 that year. Your tax bill is $300,000. Pay up."
That's all well and good if you're a CEO but if you're a web designer at a hot dot.com and you only had $15K in the bank and you trigger AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax), you're pooped. Totally pooped.
Okay so you say, well, just sell the shares for $1.5 million. But the problem is your previously hot dot.com was Pets.com and when you want to sell your shares, the current market value is 5 cents a share.
The key here is the IRS doesn't care. They still think you made $1.5 million.
Since many dot.coms were handing out stock options to everyone from the secretary on up, lots of people the government never intended to catch with AMT owed a lot. I think you weren't totally screwed as you could sell your shares at a loss and then write the loss off bit by bit on your earned income. But it was like handing over $300K to the IRS and then getting it back from the IRS $20,000 a year...
____
Doh. If you held the stocks for a year and sold, you paid the capital gains rate. If you sold right away, you paid your marginal tax rate (ie more). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
They also get to exclude $80,000 from the income they report to the I.R.S. |
Foreign Canadians are required to pay income tax on all income; there's no cutoff. Still sounds good to me.
Ken:> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
Quote: |
They also get to exclude $80,000 from the income they report to the I.R.S. |
Foreign Canadians are required to pay income tax on all income; there's no cutoff. Still sounds good to me.
Ken:> |
Expatriate Tax Status for Canadians
... professional tax advice should be sought before acting on any information provided in this article.
Canadian Residency and Worldwide Income
Determining what the tax consequences are of moving to another country, either permanently or temporarily, requires some foresight. If an individual severs Canadian residency for tax purposes, a final "departure tax return" should be filed in Canada.
http://www.medhunters.com/articles/cdnExpatTax.html
When you become a Non-Resident of Canada
Under Canadian law, unlike U.S. law, we tax individuals based on residency. Once a person leaves Canada, he or she is no longer taxable in Canada on non-Canadian income. The U.S. income tax is based on residency and citizenship, so a US citizen is taxable regardless of residency, and non-citizens are taxed only while resident. Non-residents pay tax on some types of income generated in Canada, but are generally not subject to worldwide taxation in Canada. Canada also deems individuals to have disposed of certain assets on the date of departure from Canada, whether actually sold or not.
http://www.expatriate.com/incometaxservices-expats.htm#NON-RES
The Expatriate Group Inc
http://www.expat.ca/tax_advice.htm
Common Topics for International and Non-resident Taxes
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tax/nonresidents/common/menu-e.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hogwonguy1979

Joined: 22 Dec 2003 Location: the racoon den
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the problem though for US yanks is if you earn income in the states (interest, capital gains, maybe you rent out some property, heck you may even work while in the US while on vacation etc) that is taxed at a higher rate example:
Korean income US $ 35,000 (about what I make at my univ)
US income $ 8,000
total gross income $43,000
less foreign income exclusion $35,000
taxable income $8,000
Here where it gets nasty, you used to be able to figure the tax for the level at the $8,000 level which may be 11% or $880, now that will be taxed at rate for your total income of $43,000 say 15% or $1200, a big difference. Now of course you still your exemption and standard dedections to knock income off that taxable income but you get the picture. On our Korean income, how many of us report what your hagwon or univ is paying in rent or even have an idea what it would rent for? In all reality this won't affect us but a person who is working for a US company who gets a nice house in HK with a maid, gets his kids int school paid for etc will be nailed by this big time
Apparently this was snuck in at the last minute by Sen Charles Grassley R-Iowa chair of the Senate finance comittee who wanted to kill the foreign income exclusion a couple of years ago. Nobody really knew about it until it was too late.
What you should be doing is FAXING (not emailing, those get deleted, not snail mailing, those get tossed, somebody has to pick up and read those faxes) your senators and congressmen about this and tell them why should we be paying taxes when we don't use any US services, we don't drive on US highways, etc.
Come on fellow yanks jam thos fax maxhines, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moldy Rutabaga wrote: |
Quote: |
They also get to exclude $80,000 from the income they report to the I.R.S. |
Foreign Canadians are required to pay income tax on all income; there's no cutoff. Still sounds good to me.
Ken:> |
Only if they have significant ties to Canada (ie a house, dependants, renew their health card/drivers license). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|