|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 5:53 pm Post subject: That tyrant King George |
|
|
Quote: |
America's problem is again a usurping king called George
Bush's determination to impose his own reading of new laws amounts to a power grab and subverts the US constitution
Martin Kettle
Saturday June 17, 2006
The Guardian
Imagine a country with a different kind of monarch from the one we are used to. Forget the nation-binding human monarch whom Archbishop Rowan Williams praised so deftly this week. Imagine instead a monarch who, like many of Elizabeth II's ancestors, routinely reserved the right to override laws passed by the legislature, or who repeatedly asserted that the laws mean something they do not say. Imagine, in fact, King George of America.
On April 30 the Boston Globe journalist Charlie Savage wrote an article whose contents become more astonishing the more one reads them. Over the past five years, Savage reported, President George Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws that have been enacted by the United States Congress since he took office. At the heart of Bush's strategy is the claim that the president has the power to set aside any statute that conflicts with his own interpretation of the constitution.
Remarkably, this systematic reach for power has occurred not in secret but in public. Go to the White House website and the evidence is there in black and white. It takes the form of dozens of documents in which Bush asserts that his power as the nation's commander in chief entitles him to overrule or ignore bills sent to him by Congress for his signature. Behind this claim is a doctrine of the "unitary executive", which argues that the president's oath of office endows him with an independent authority to decide what a law means.
Periodically, congressional leaders come down from Capitol Hill to applaud as the president, seated at his desk, signs a bill that becomes the law of the land. They are corny occasions. But they are a photo-op reminder that American law-making involves compromises that reflect a balance between the legislature and the presidency. The signing ceremony symbolises that the balance has been upheld and renewed.
After the legislators leave, however, Bush puts his signature to another document. Known as a signing statement, this document is a presidential pronouncement setting out the terms in which he intends to interpret the new law. These signing statements often conflict with the new statutes. In some cases they even contradict their clear meaning. Increasing numbers of scholars and critics now believe they amount to a systematic power grab within a system that rests on checks and balances of which generations of Americans have been rightly proud - and of which others are justly envious. |
For the rest of the article click here
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1799692,00.html
And just to assage the delicate sensibilities of our little friend Gopher, I've pasted the last paragraph:
Quote: |
It is not anti-American to warn about what Bush is doing. On the contrary, it is profoundly pro-American. In 1776 Americans issued their declaration of independence. They demanded a new form of government in place of the "repeated injuries and usurpations" to which they had been subjected. In the long list of grievances that followed, the first was that King George had "refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good". That suddenly has a contemporary ring. Now, as then, America's problem is a usurping king called George. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guri Guy

Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Location: Bamboo Island
|
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
It is not anti-American to warn about what Bush is doing. On the contrary, it is profoundly pro-American. |
I think some posters in this forum should read this again and again until it sinks into their heads. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"The history of liberty is a history of the limitations of governmental power, not the increase of it." - Woodrow Wilson.
"When even one American - who has done nothing wrong -- is forced by fear to shut his mind and close his mouth, then all of Americans are in peril." -- Harry S. Truman
"No Man is justified in doing evil on the grounds of expedience." -- Theodore Roosevelt
"It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes." - Andrew Jackson
"Every gun that is made, every warship that is launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed" -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
"The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted." - James Madison
I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts." --Abraham Lincoln
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." �George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004 (Watch video clip
"You never know what your history is going to be like until long after you're gone." �George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 5, 2006 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deadman
Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
More quotes about govt power (not necessarily from presidents)
"If neccessary, the people should push the government aside to achieve peace" - Dwight D Eisenhower
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it" - Thomas Jefferson
"Silence (when freedom is threatened) is not golden; it is yellow" - Tom Anderson
"The right most valued by all civilized men is the right to be left alone" - Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis
"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive" - Thomas Jefferson
"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" - Voltaire |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knives, rifles and a whip. Are Bush's gift-givers trying to say something?
Gee, this list sounds almost like the one from the Canada terrorist cell raid.
Why, we even have fertilizer! � PID
2004 presents inventory reads like a paranoid survivalist's
By Julian Borger
UK Guardian
June 16, 2006
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1799599,00.html
WASHINGTON � A braided leather whip, a sniper rifle, six jars of fertiliser and a copy of the "Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook" were among the presents foreign leaders have given George Bush. They are clearly trying to tell him something.
The inventory of official gifts from 2004, published this week by the state department reads like the wish list of the sort of paranoid survivalist who holes up in his log cabin to await Armageddon, having long ago severed all ties with the rest of the world.
The president received a startling array of weapons, including assorted daggers, and a machete from Gabon. He got the braided whip with a wooden handle from the Hungarian prime minister. The "Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook", a gift from the Sultan of Brunei, has some tips on how to use some of these implements in a tight spot.
The paperback also explains how to wrestle with an alligator, escape from a mountain lion, and take a punch to the body. But the small arsenal of guns presented by Jordan's King Abdullah, including a $10,000 sniper rifle, would presumably render much of that advice unnecessary.
The king also gave President Bush six jars of "various fertilisers", on a rotating wooden stand. It sounds like the sort of present likely to cause offence when coming from a mother-in-law or sibling. But according to the Jordanian embassy, the jars contained neither manure nor the sort of chemicals that can be turned into home made bombs, but rather an array of fertile volcanic soils found around the country.
In each instance listed by the state department, the acceptance of the gift is justified by the phrase "non-acceptance would cause embarrassment to donor and US government". But acceptance clearly has its own embarrassments.
For example, it is hard to imagine the tough-talking non-nonsense Donald Rumsfeld summoning much enthusiasm for the gold bracelet he got from the Egyptian minister of defence, or the aromatherapy gift set from those cheeky Jordanians. There will, however, be no calming scents wafting around the Pentagon any time soon, as the gift was hastily passed on to the general services administration, a government department that disposes in unwanted presents.
If the top members of the administration met to compare gifts at the end of the year, Mr Rumsfeld would no doubt have been looking enviously over the president's shoulder at some of his weapons, or at the special presentation edition of "The Art of War" Dick Cheney got from the Chinese vice president.
But Mr Cheney also received presents clearly intended to enhance his gentler, fun-loving side: a "Happy Day" clock from the Swiss president, gold silk pillows, scented candles and a pottery incense burner (the Jordanians again).
It is apparent from this document that a lot of the foreign dignitaries do not do much research before they go looking for appropriate gifts. President Bush, a reformed drunk who does not touch alcohol, was given a cellar full of wine over the course of 2004.
CIA agents seem to get a lot of presents from abroad, although the recipients (other than the director at the time, George Tenet) are not named. Nor are the donor governments although it is usually easy enough to guess from the gifts, many of which are from the Middle East or Pakistan.
Under government rules, officials are only allowed to hold on to the gifts worth under $100 after they leave office. Others are consigned to presidential libraries or the national archives, where they are occasionally put on display to illustrate America's warm ties with the rest of the world.
There will be nothing to show for the much-vaunted special relationship. Despite standing shoulder to shoulder in Iraq and around the world in 2004, President Bush got nothing from Tony Blair, for Christmas or his birthday  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|