| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: Gyeonggi_Do getting BETTER? |
 |
|
In the face of popular opinion it seems that Gyeonggi-Do contracts are getting BETTER not worse. Read xox posting his contract. It's pretty much the same as the ones we signed last year, except it says that teaching camp hours will be limited to 40 hours per school VACATION.
And there is nothing about staying until 8 PM on Fridays or any such other nonsense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mack the knife
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: standing right behind you...
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
A. That's not a GEPIK contract, which is what everyone (including myself) is fed up with.
B. It's for middle/high schools. As far as I know, all of the GEPIK teachers taught elementary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mack the knife wrote: |
A. That's not a GEPIK contract, which is what everyone (including myself) is fed up with.
B. It's for middle/high schools. As far as I know, all of the GEPIK teachers taught elementary. |
The contract is exactly the same as mine, except for that one clause I mentioned above. And the entity he signed with is the same one I did. It could be that Gy-Do is seeing the light and throwing a few bones the teachers way, could it not? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
livinginkorea
Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Location: Korea, South of the border
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I doubt it that they have seen the light! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mack the knife
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: standing right behind you...
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's a one-contract, two-systems approach. Those who signed with GEPIK schools, using the GEPIK contract, got a raw deal. Those who signed with non-GEPIK schools, using the GEPIK contract as a template, have been doing just fine, apparently. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
laogaiguk
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mack the knife wrote: |
| It's a one-contract, two-systems approach. Those who signed with GEPIK schools, using the GEPIK contract, got a raw deal. Those who signed with non-GEPIK schools, using the GEPIK contract as a template, have been doing just fine, apparently. |
Yep. Doing fine here because I was hired independent of GEPIK or EPIK or any of those agencies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mack the knife
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: standing right behind you...
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Yep. Doing fine here because I was hired independent of GEPIK or EPIK or any of those agencies |
And let that be a lesson to all you noobs out there. As mentioned in another thread, steer clear of GEPIK. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| laogaiguk wrote: |
| Yep. Doing fine here because I was hired independent of GEPIK or EPIK or any of those agencies. |
When you say you were hired independently, do you mean by a recruiter?
I'm just curious.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
