| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:45 am Post subject: Government to Expand Childbirth Incentives |
|
|
Government to Expand Childbirth Incentives
| Quote: |
Starting next year at the earliest, families with children under five, or who have a new-born child, will receive 100,000 won per month for each child, the Ministry of Health and Welfare announced Friday.
However, exact details have yet to be determined as the payment scheme still needs to be worked out. For example, there is still debate as to whether the money will go to all families with children under five, or only to those with two or more children of whom one or all may be under five.
The measure is part of a childbirth incentive system to tackle the country's low birth rates.
|
| Quote: |
To promote adoption, the government will grant families 100,000 won a month per adopted child until they turn 18. Also, adoption administrative fees of some 2 million won will be abolished.
To encourage working women to have more children, the government will increase the number of state-run nurseries from 1,352 to 2,700 to take care of 30 percent of eligible children.
The plan also calls for up to 5,400 schools to offer after-hours extra-curricular classes to relieve parents' spending on private education.
|
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200607/kt2006071418231710510.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
endo

Joined: 14 Mar 2004 Location: Seoul...my home
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why is the government worried abut populaton decline?
There are already way too many people in this country. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| endo wrote: |
Why is the government worried abut populaton decline?
There are already way too many people in this country. |
Economies don't work with a declining population very well
But this is a good thing. What were they thinking with a 2 million administrative fee. I just hope they keep testing standards high and not send these children to bad homes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
endo

Joined: 14 Mar 2004 Location: Seoul...my home
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Robots man. Get those bastards to fill in the jobs as the population declines.
The robots will be our new slaves. Humans love slaves, we've been doing it for thousands of years.
Seriously though, technology can easily fill in for a dwindeling population. And it will be a lot easier to do this in a country like South Korea which has the money and infastructure to pull it off.
Unfortunately, as the population declines in South Korea, it will be the lower classes who will be affected the most as they lack the necessary funds to raise children.
So the middle and upper middle class is where the only genuine population growth will come from. But they also have the money to raise a child that will be much more producutve in the greater Korean economy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pocketfluff

Joined: 30 May 2006 Location: Washington, DC (school) and Los Angeles, CA (home)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| endo wrote: |
| The robots will be our new slaves. |
I think it will be the other way around.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
endo

Joined: 14 Mar 2004 Location: Seoul...my home
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, the robots will be our slaves first, but then they'll turn the tables. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| endo wrote: |
| Yeah, the robots will be our slaves first, but then they'll turn the tables. |
Just like all my ex-girlfriends  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, is there also the concern of supporting an aging population, as in Japan and China (with the lack of women to be married)? I don't have a breakdown of demographics, or anything, but I'd guess economics plus Confucianism play an equally big role here.
I just wonder where all this money will come from to fund these after-school programs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kat2

Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Location: Busan, South Korea
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It drives me nuts that countries like South Korea, Japan, or much of Europe is so concerned about birth rate decline. The world is already way over populated. The last thing we need to do is encourage overpopulation. If these countries would encourage immigration, their young laborer shortage would be gone. Globalization and free trade demands that there also be freer movement of laborers (both long and short term laborers). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
A robot doesn't earn money and he doesn't spend it either
That is why you need a growing population, increasing productivity and a grow in salaries. To sustain the economy as we know it.
The problem is welfare, more specifically pension funds, they are costly and if you have more people not producing but getting "free" money, it becomes more and more difficult to actually |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|