View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
animalbirdfish
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:59 am Post subject: Continued or Continuing? |
|
|
Had a Korean colleague ask me which of the following is correct and why:
Thank you for your continued support.
Thank you for your continuing support.
As often happens, I found myself stumped. So, I suggested that he use "Thanks for your ongoing support." But that didn't satisfy this guy. He really wants to know and said he couldn't find the answer.
Anyone? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
According to m-w.com:
Main Entry: con�tin�ue
Pronunciation: k&n-'tin-(")y�
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): -tin�ued; -tinu�ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French continuer, from Latin continuare, from continuus
intransitive verb
1 : to maintain without interruption a condition, course, or action
Main Entry: continued
Function: adjective
1 : lasting or extending without interruption
Looks like they mean the same thing to me!! Just one of those inexplicable English things!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:54 am Post subject: Re: Continued or Continuing? |
|
|
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Had a Korean colleague ask me which of the following is correct and why:
Thank you for your continued support. |
It went on for a long time but now it stopped, there will be no more support
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Thank you for your continuing support.
|
The support is still there, it is ongoing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:01 am Post subject: Re: Continued or Continuing? |
|
|
Juregen wrote: |
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Had a Korean colleague ask me which of the following is correct and why:
Thank you for your continued support. |
It went on for a long time but now it stopped, there will be no more support
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Thank you for your continuing support.
|
The support is still there, it is ongoing. |
Yeah, I thought about that, too...but even when you say "continued support" you DO want the other party to keep supporting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Novernae
Joined: 02 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:10 am Post subject: Re: Continued or Continuing? |
|
|
ajuma wrote: |
Juregen wrote: |
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Had a Korean colleague ask me which of the following is correct and why:
Thank you for your continued support. |
It went on for a long time but now it stopped, there will be no more support
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Thank you for your continuing support.
|
The support is still there, it is ongoing. |
Yeah, I thought about that, too...but even when you say "continued support" you DO want the other party to keep supporting!! |
I think you're both right. In prescriptive grammar Juregen explained it well, but we don't always follow what's 'correct' when we speak, in which case ajuma is right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:08 am Post subject: Re: Continued or Continuing? |
|
|
Novernae wrote: |
ajuma wrote: |
Juregen wrote: |
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Had a Korean colleague ask me which of the following is correct and why:
Thank you for your continued support. |
It went on for a long time but now it stopped, there will be no more support
animalbirdfish wrote: |
Thank you for your continuing support.
|
The support is still there, it is ongoing. |
Yeah, I thought about that, too...but even when you say "continued support" you DO want the other party to keep supporting!! |
I think you're both right. In prescriptive grammar Juregen explained it well, but we don't always follow what's 'correct' when we speak, in which case ajuma is right. |
Yeap
One of those funny language issues that no one can really explain.
Language is a living thing, it mutates. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is a difference in what linguists call 'aspect', a verbal category (and here, the modifiers 'continued' and 'continuing' are deverbal) that presents a speaker's perspective on an event. In many cases, use of aspect in English is a matter of choice - more than one aspectual possibility can be grammatically correct. The different choices give slightly different 'feels' to the meaning of the utterance.
So, in this case, both forms are grammatically correct, but each has a slightly different meaning, a different feel. The progressive form (-ing) focuses attention on the duration of support over time, it's ongoing nature, and perhaps, its continuation into the future. The perfect form (-ed) focuses attention on the fact that support has continued up to the present moment. It says nothing about the future, but does not preclude continuation of the action. (For example, the following sentence contains perfect aspect on the verb but does not suggest that I have moved from Seoul: I have lived in Seoul for five months).
If we believe that linguistic structure influences thought, then I'd go with the progressive, which focuses on duration and contains some implication for the future. If you want to avoid this concern altogether, use 'continuous'.
Bonus rant: We waste a lot of time teaching rules for the so-called 'tenses' of English, when in fact, these forms almost all involve choices of aspect in addition to time reference. The fact that aspect is largely a matter of choice means that it cannot be easily reduced to rules. For example, Dave Willis has suggested that the difference between past simple and present perfect (both of which refer to past time, but differ in aspect) is so subtle and so complex as to be unteachable. He recommends instead exposure to a lot of language and discussion of alternatives as a way to help students get the feel for the choice. The tests that insist on one clear choice in aspect for a correct answer are usually highly artificial. But those tests exist, and so we waste our and our students' time on so called rules. And then people complain that learners can't speak/don't know English.
Last edited by Woland on Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:54 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is gold |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
semphoon

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: Where Nowon is
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Woland wrote: |
Bonus rant: We waste a lot of time teaching rules for the so-called 'tenses' of English, when in fact, these forms almost all involve choices of aspect in addition to time reference. The fact that aspect is largely a matter of choice means that it cannot be easily reduced to rules. For example, Dave Willis has suggested that the difference between past simple and present perfect (both of which refer to past time, but differ in aspect) is so subtle and so complex as to be unteachable. He recommends instead exposure to a lot of language and discussion of alternatives as a way to help students get the feel for the choice. The tests that insist on one clear choice in aspect for a correct answer are usually highly artificial. . |
That's all well and good but can you make my students say "roof."
Only joshing. I admire you knowledge on these issues. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe I'm off base on this, but aren't 'continued' and 'continuing' in the same category as 'interested' and 'interesting'?
I was interested in that movie./That movie was interesting.
In both cases I enjoyed the movie and although the movie is over, my interest in it didn't stop.
I agree with ajumma (again!). If I received a letter saying 'Thank you for your continued support', I would not conclude that my support has stopped. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I agree with ajumma (again!). If I received a letter saying 'Thank you for your continued support', I would not conclude that my support has stopped. |
Thanks for your continuted/continuing support!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
animalbirdfish
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, folks. Thanks for all the thoughtful responses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ms ajuma,
I would be happy to continue supporting you; to have continued supporting you; lend you continuing support...
But I would never ever, under any circumstances, consider continuTed supporting you. I respect you too much for THAT.
(But if you are into Konglish, we could be 'intimate friends'.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Ms ajuma,
I would be happy to continue supporting you; to have continued supporting you; lend you continuing support...
But I would never ever, under any circumstances, consider continuTed supporting you. I respect you too much for THAT.
(But if you are into Konglish, we could be 'intimate friends'.) |
Blast it! WHY doesn't Dave's have spell-check????? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
out of context
Joined: 08 Jan 2006 Location: Daejeon
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
For what it's worth, I think the first one sounds a little bit more polite. "Thank you for your continued support" suggests that the speaker appreciates what has been done from the past to the present, while "Thank you for your continuing support" seems to carry the implication that the speaker expects the support to continue into the future. If you don't expect that the addressee would find the second one presumptuous, then I would say there's little difference. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|