Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

contract issues with GEPIK
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
freethought



Joined: 13 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:18 pm    Post subject: contract issues with GEPIK Reply with quote

Ok, here's the deal.

I'm now working at a middle school in the Seoul area through gepik. I got the job through a recruiter, who i am now less than pleased with.

I have my MA, 1 year in Korea and a 65 hour tesl. Also LOTS of ESL tutoring of uni students in Canada.

Anyway, I signed a contract and sent it over with the other documents. The visa was issued, but the contract had an error. It said 2.3 million, when it should have said 2.2 million won.

An issue has arisen in that the hagwon I worked for when I was last here has closed, and so I can't get a letter stating my work experience.

There is another issue in that I have guest speeches/lectures I did at a high school in canada. The resume clearly said GUEST lecturer and the description made it clear that I was NOT a teacher.

Anyway, the recruiter waited until 28 hours before my departure to tell me that the contract/pay was based on his lying(to me and maybe the school) about that guest lecturing experience.

So this is my situation---

I have a visa based on a signed contract

The school says with no letter from the hagwon they cannot give me the 2.2 million(even though my contract says 2,3 milion)

The guest lecture thing has not been raised.

What can I do? What's the law? I plan on driving a hard bargain, but this is an issue that needs to be worked out in the next two weeks. If I have a visa do they have to pay me the 2.3?

Thoughts? Suggestions?

Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shouldn't your MA also put you in the 2.3 million bracket anyways??? Can you argue that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freethought



Joined: 13 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the MA gives you 2.0. With two years experience you get 2.2. Or, if you have an MA and a 100 hour tesl you get 2.2 (I get 4 weeks vacation, otherwise it gets me 2.3 if I only have two weeks).

My argument was going to be that between my MA, my one years and my TESL, I should get 2.2. But the hagwon being closed has thrown a wrench into that plan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

freethought wrote:
the MA gives you 2.0. With two years experience you get 2.2. Or, if you have an MA and a 100 hour tesl you get 2.2 (I get 4 weeks vacation, otherwise it gets me 2.3 if I only have two weeks).

My argument was going to be that between my MA, my one years and my TESL, I should get 2.2. But the hagwon being closed has thrown a wrench into that plan.


Oh, I can't help then. Sorry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajgeddes



Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Location: Yongsan

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't even know 2.2 million was even an option for GEPIK. From my understanding, Level 3 is 1.8, Level 2 is 2.0 and level 1 is 2.3. The 65 hour TESL means absolutely nothing in GEPIK. Either forget about it, or upgrade it to 100 hours (that's what I did). As far as your pay goes, I imagine they can't pay you for qualifications or experience you don't really have, so it is just the recruiter that is a complete dumbass.

Also, one year at a Hagwon only counts as 6 months experience.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Junior



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Location: the eye

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

freethought wrote:


My argument was going to be that between my MA, my one years and my TESL, I should get 2.2. But the hagwon being closed has thrown a wrench into that plan.


I don't have an MA and I'm on 2:3.

I have a BA, 100hr CELTA, and 2.5 yrs hogwon exp.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajgeddes



Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Location: Yongsan

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Junior wrote:
freethought wrote:


My argument was going to be that between my MA, my one years and my TESL, I should get 2.2. But the hagwon being closed has thrown a wrench into that plan.


I don't have an MA and I'm on 2:3.

I have a BA, 100hr CELTA, and 2.5 yrs hogwon exp.


You have 2 of the 3 qualifications needed, he only has 1.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sody



Joined: 14 May 2006

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ajgeddes wrote:
I didn't even know 2.2 million was even an option for GEPIK. From my understanding, Level 3 is 1.8, Level 2 is 2.0 and level 1 is 2.3. The 65 hour TESL means absolutely nothing in GEPIK. Either forget about it, or upgrade it to 100 hours (that's what I did). As far as your pay goes, I imagine they can't pay you for qualifications or experience you don't really have, so it is just the recruiter that is a complete dumbass.

Also, one year at a Hagwon only counts as 6 months experience.


That really doesn't seem fair, I worked at an eikawa for one year and that counts as one year of experience. An eikawa is similar to a hagwon I believe but with better working conditions and students. So the one year experience at a hagwon should be equivalent to one year teaching experience.

If they say otherwise I would simply ask them, have you ever taught before? I would then emphasize that I was very professional and the one year should be counted as one year. You can be assertive with the recruiter. Also you can tell them that you want to work for a better salary. Insist on it, be professional and assertive and let them know that you know of other teachers who have negotiated for better. Don't argue just assert the facts.

Also remember that GEPIK is the cheapest of the three. EPIK and SMOE pay more according to the recruiters I have dealt with.

You have very little negotiating power if you are not in Korea though.

Sody
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sody wrote:
ajgeddes wrote:
I didn't even know 2.2 million was even an option for GEPIK. From my understanding, Level 3 is 1.8, Level 2 is 2.0 and level 1 is 2.3. The 65 hour TESL means absolutely nothing in GEPIK. Either forget about it, or upgrade it to 100 hours (that's what I did). As far as your pay goes, I imagine they can't pay you for qualifications or experience you don't really have, so it is just the recruiter that is a complete dumbass.

Also, one year at a Hagwon only counts as 6 months experience.


That really doesn't seem fair, I worked at an eikawa for one year and that counts as one year of experience. An eikawa is similar to a hagwon I believe but with better working conditions and students. So the one year experience at a hagwon should be equivalent to one year teaching experience.

If they say otherwise I would simply ask them, have you ever taught before? I would then emphasize that I was very professional and the one year should be counted as one year. You can be assertive with the recruiter. Also you can tell them that you want to work for a better salary. Insist on it, be professional and assertive and let them know that you know of other teachers who have negotiated for better. Don't argue just assert the facts.

Also remember that GEPIK is the cheapest of the three. EPIK and SMOE pay more according to the recruiters I have dealt with.

You have very little negotiating power if you are not in Korea though.

Sody


Which eikaiwa? Though I sort of disagree and think even the worse eikaiwa is better than the average hagwon here Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajgeddes



Joined: 28 Apr 2004
Location: Yongsan

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sody wrote:
ajgeddes wrote:
I didn't even know 2.2 million was even an option for GEPIK. From my understanding, Level 3 is 1.8, Level 2 is 2.0 and level 1 is 2.3. The 65 hour TESL means absolutely nothing in GEPIK. Either forget about it, or upgrade it to 100 hours (that's what I did). As far as your pay goes, I imagine they can't pay you for qualifications or experience you don't really have, so it is just the recruiter that is a complete dumbass.

Also, one year at a Hagwon only counts as 6 months experience.


That really doesn't seem fair, I worked at an eikawa for one year and that counts as one year of experience. An eikawa is similar to a hagwon I believe but with better working conditions and students. So the one year experience at a hagwon should be equivalent to one year teaching experience.

If they say otherwise I would simply ask them, have you ever taught before? I would then emphasize that I was very professional and the one year should be counted as one year. You can be assertive with the recruiter. Also you can tell them that you want to work for a better salary. Insist on it, be professional and assertive and let them know that you know of other teachers who have negotiated for better. Don't argue just assert the facts.

Also remember that GEPIK is the cheapest of the three. EPIK and SMOE pay more according to the recruiters I have dealt with.

You have very little negotiating power if you are not in Korea though.

Sody


It has nothing to do with the recruiter though. It has to do with the school and the government with GEPIK. There might be room for some negotiations, but as far as I know, there isn't when it comes to pay. You also need to have proof that you worked there before. It isn't just some thing you put on your resume. You get a sheet from your employer that states your exact work dates and it has the magical red stamp.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Grotto



Joined: 21 Mar 2004

PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could always say okay then...I will look for another job....if they are not willing to honour your contract then find another!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freethought



Joined: 13 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

--- bump---
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Junior



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Location: the eye

PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Letter of reference: surely you kept in contact with at least 1 person from your hagwon?? you worked there for a year. you should be able to get hold of your former director or supervisor, for a reference. If you didn't get a reference before you left, then thats just lazy.


What do you want? 2.3?? you can only get that with 2 or more years exp, not just 1. You're lucky to be on 2.2. The requirements are laid down pretty clearly with GEPIK. You are a 2.0 candidate.

your guest lecturing thingy isn't worth s*it. Whey even mention it? I passed grade 3 clarinet, woohoo.

To be honest, (not being mean), you sound like a pain for a recruiter to deal with. Its a public school, theres no incentive for them to s*rew you over, its pretty straightforward.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sody



Joined: 14 May 2006

PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

laogaiguk wrote:
Which eikaiwa? Though I sort of disagree and think even the worse eikaiwa is better than the average hagwon here Smile


It was a private prep school in Fukuoka, Japan. I taught various ages and skill levels so I just assumed naturally that it was like a hagwon. I'm intrigued now, I think I will try and visit a hagwon and see what it is like. I mean, how bad can they possibly be?

Ajgeddes, if that is the case then I got really lucky with the recruiter I dealt with. I didn't have to do a criminal reference check, they didn't call my past employer in Japan and I was able to negotiate the higher pay scale. I think the reason for why I was able to get all these benefits was because I am older and more experienced than most. They respect you more if you are over 30 but under 40. I can't verify or prove that but that is the feeling I get at the public school I work at.

There is no way in hell that any native speaker who is new would get a better salary than a new Korean teacher. They wouldn't allow that. I really don't think they respect teachers who are below the age of 25 either. Again, I can't prove this but it's a feeling that I am very certain of.

Elementary school teachers are well respected if they fit the age bracket of 25- 40 something. I know for certain that if you are too old they won't respect you at all. Several Korean teachers have told me that because your success as an older teacher is based upon becoming a principal. If you aren't a principal by a certain age then you will be looked down upon.

Remember that in Korea, there is far less pension than you would get in a place like Canada. Koreans are expected to retire earlier, from last I heard it was age 62.

Anyhow, with regards to the main issue of this thread I now know that if you work in Korea they will check your work history in this country very carefully. So if you want to be in a good pay scale you better have a good work history in this country!

Sody
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sody wrote:
laogaiguk wrote:
Which eikaiwa? Though I sort of disagree and think even the worse eikaiwa is better than the average hagwon here Smile


It was a private prep school in Fukuoka, Japan. I taught various ages and skill levels so I just assumed naturally that it was like a hagwon. I'm intrigued now, I think I will try and visit a hagwon and see what it is like. I mean, how bad can they possibly be?


No. First you have cultural differences, the Japanese, whatever people might say, are much more honest. I never heard of anyone in Japan not getting paid except I heard once that one American who owns an eikaiwa in Aichi (or Sapporo) refused to pay and has been taken to court for assault. Another reason is ofcourse a business that went bankrupt.

Second is the law. Contract laws are enforced more in Japan (on both sides) and the visa issue (where in Japan you own your visa), you can just quit with notice at anytime.

There are other things, but most of those are easily found on this website Wink, but just those things right there make it bad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International