| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:40 am Post subject: Grammar Question |
|
|
Shopping is difficult, but it is fun to do.
Shopping is difficult, but fun to do.
In the second sentence does a subject need to be written out? Isn't it implied? Without the subject in the second clause it still needs a comma, right?
Yet with "and " as a coordinating conjuction this is not true.
I should not use a comma in the second phrase unless there is a subject and that subject must be written not implied. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jmbran11
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 Location: U.S.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
IThe second one does not need a comma, because the second clause is not a complete sentence but rather a dependent clause (I think). No different than "and".
Ex.: Shopping is fun, but I hate it.
Shopping is fun but difficult for me. (I think) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daskalos
Joined: 19 May 2006 Location: The Road to Ithaca
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think we call what you're talking about "ellipsis," where the subject "shopping" is implied, because leaving it in is ungainly. Because it still qualifies as a compound sentence, it needs the comma, at least that's what they taught me in TESOL class.
Which isn't to say that "Shopping is difficult but fun to do" can't be a sentence in its own right. But it doesn't carry exactly the same meaning. Not sure how exactly, but I think it's that without the comma, "fun" is qualifying "difficult." With the comma, both "difficult" and "fun" refer to "shopping."
__________________________________
ellipsis
noun
1. grammar.
A figure of speech in which a word or words needed for the sense or grammar are omitted but understood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| My opinion is that the comma is optional in the second sentence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:38 am Post subject: rec'd this answer |
|
|
The subject does not need to be written out - it is implied, as you correctly say. It also needs a comma, because there is a pause before 'but'.
A comma is a punctuation mark denoting a speech pause, and that is the only rule that applies - not whether you use a conjunction or not. For example:
1) "Working for a living is hard and boring."
2) "Working for a living is hard, and boring."
Both sentences are correct. In the first one, the conjunction is used to make a compound adjective - 'hard and boring'. In the second, the conjunction is used to connect the two phrases - it is a contraction of: "Working for a living is hard, and (it is) boring." This difference is indicated in speech by a pause in 2), and that is why the comma is used |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basically, I agree with mash. There has been, and forever will be, arguments about commas. However, if you keep it simply down to where and when you pause (not counting those instances when other forms of punctuation are necessary), it becomes easy.
Its like n, n2, and n3. Two pauses.
Its like n, n2 and n3. One pause.
Use commas the same way you speak. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll try to remember that, if I ever get my tongue unstuck from the floor, after drooling over your new avatar.
In the words of the late great Benny Hill.
What do you think of all the sex and violence on TV?
BH: Well, I look at it like this",
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
daskalos
Joined: 19 May 2006 Location: The Road to Ithaca
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
| Use commas the same way you speak. |
Well, except that some people throw in pauses just for effect, pauses that, if denoted in written English with a comma, change the grammatical sense of the sentence. Spoken and written English are not the same things. Even within those two categories, there are several categories. Puncutation appropriate to a term paper is often not appropriate to journalism or creative prose and certainly not to poetry, if indeed poetry has any puntuation rules. Speech appropriate to the board room is not used in the lunch room or a bar.
The tussle between open and closed punctuation is all well and good, and a valid discussion to be had, but advice like "use commas the way you speak" only goes so far. I think it's important to know what the grammar of the matter is before you decide just to go with what feels right. If you're going to break a "rule," especially when writing, know you're breaking it and know why. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|