Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

phone numbers
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:00 am    Post subject: phone numbers Reply with quote

I am (was, still am???) a programmer, with a bachelor of computer science.
Having said that, Korean phone numbers drive me up the wall.

999) 746-1928

Why not have the first bracket. AHHHHHH! Why only the one? I guess it still works as we understand, but AHHHH! I guess my mind is too much like a compiler.

I also tend to put the punctuation outside of the quotation marks of a quotation. For example, "My job rocks". <----- That is grammatically incorrect, but a compiler (or my trained brain) wouldn't (doesn't) like it.

By the way, I got assauted by 5 Koreans and Jessica Alba last night in Itaewon!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Return Jones



Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Location: I will see you in far-off places

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's all this Alba stuff going around? Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sleepy in Seoul



Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

laogaiguk wrote:
I also tend to put the punctuation outside of the quotation marks of a quotation. For example, "My job rocks". <----- That is grammatically incorrect, but a compiler (or my trained brain) wouldn't (doesn't) like it.


Not so. It is actually grammatically correct and extremely logical to place the punctuation outside the quotation marks where it doesn't affect the meaning of the quotation. It is counterintuitive and illogical to put it anywhere else. I also have a computer science degree and it drives me spare too.

http://www.answerbag.com/q_view.php/2932
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
billybrobby



Joined: 09 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sleepy in Seoul wrote:
laogaiguk wrote:
I also tend to put the punctuation outside of the quotation marks of a quotation. For example, "My job rocks". <----- That is grammatically incorrect, but a compiler (or my trained brain) wouldn't (doesn't) like it.


Not so. It is actually grammatically correct and extremely logical to place the punctuation outside the quotation marks where it doesn't affect the meaning of the quotation. It is counterintuitive and illogical to put it anywhere else. I also have a computer science degree and it drives me spare too.

http://www.answerbag.com/q_view.php/2932


I think this is one of those cases where somebody takes personal preference and attaches to it the qualities of intuitiveness and logicality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Woland



Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, the punctuation and quotation marks thing is a difference between American and British standards. American standard prefers the punctuation inside the quotes, while British standard puts it outside.

While I'm used to the American standard, I recognize, as Geoffrey Pullum has pointed out, that it can violate the truth conditions of sentences. The British standard is better in this regard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Qinella



Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always put the punctuation outside the quote, too, unless the punctuation was part of the quote. Seems stupid to quote it if it wasn't originally spoken/written.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sleepy in Seoul



Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

billybrobby wrote:
Sleepy in Seoul wrote:
laogaiguk wrote:
I also tend to put the punctuation outside of the quotation marks of a quotation. For example, "My job rocks". <----- That is grammatically incorrect, but a compiler (or my trained brain) wouldn't (doesn't) like it.


Not so. It is actually grammatically correct and extremely logical to place the punctuation outside the quotation marks where it doesn't affect the meaning of the quotation. It is counterintuitive and illogical to put it anywhere else. I also have a computer science degree and it drives me spare too.

http://www.answerbag.com/q_view.php/2932


I think this is one of those cases where somebody takes personal preference and attaches to it the qualities of intuitiveness and logicality.


Perhaps, but I don't think so. If you think about it, one of the reasons for putting words in quotation marks is to preserve the exact way that they were written or uttered. To place punctuation within those marks can alter (sometimes drastically) the meaning, thereby defeating the purpose of using the quotation marks in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
billybrobby



Joined: 09 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sleepy in Seoul wrote:
billybrobby wrote:
Sleepy in Seoul wrote:
laogaiguk wrote:
I also tend to put the punctuation outside of the quotation marks of a quotation. For example, "My job rocks". <----- That is grammatically incorrect, but a compiler (or my trained brain) wouldn't (doesn't) like it.


Not so. It is actually grammatically correct and extremely logical to place the punctuation outside the quotation marks where it doesn't affect the meaning of the quotation. It is counterintuitive and illogical to put it anywhere else. I also have a computer science degree and it drives me spare too.

http://www.answerbag.com/q_view.php/2932


I think this is one of those cases where somebody takes personal preference and attaches to it the qualities of intuitiveness and logicality.


Perhaps, but I don't think so. If you think about it, one of the reasons for putting words in quotation marks is to preserve the exact way that they were written or uttered. To place punctuation within those marks can alter (sometimes drastically) the meaning, thereby defeating the purpose of using the quotation marks in the first place.


Can you give me some examples of this? The only example I can think of involves the question mark. But in this case, the British way is equally as bad as the American way.

for example:

She said, "The store is only open on Sunday??"
If the woman is asking a question, how does the British way handle this?

Or

Did she say, "The store is only open on Sunday?"
If the woman is making a statement, how does the American way handle this?

You say that the American style forces you to add punctuation to quotes, but by the same turn, the British style forces you to delete punction. Seems equally bad. But maybe there's another example that I'm not thinking of.

ps--this sure is a hairsplitting argument, but it's interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sleepy in Seoul



Joined: 15 May 2004
Location: Going in ever decreasing circles until I eventually disappear up my own fundament - in NZ

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

billybrobby wrote:
Sleepy in Seoul wrote:
billybrobby wrote:
Sleepy in Seoul wrote:
laogaiguk wrote:
I also tend to put the punctuation outside of the quotation marks of a quotation. For example, "My job rocks". <----- That is grammatically incorrect, but a compiler (or my trained brain) wouldn't (doesn't) like it.


Not so. It is actually grammatically correct and extremely logical to place the punctuation outside the quotation marks where it doesn't affect the meaning of the quotation. It is counterintuitive and illogical to put it anywhere else. I also have a computer science degree and it drives me spare too.

http://www.answerbag.com/q_view.php/2932


I think this is one of those cases where somebody takes personal preference and attaches to it the qualities of intuitiveness and logicality.

Perhaps, but I don't think so. If you think about it, one of the reasons for putting words in quotation marks is to preserve the exact way that they were written or uttered. To place punctuation within those marks can alter (sometimes drastically) the meaning, thereby defeating the purpose of using the quotation marks in the first place.




Can you give me some examples of this? The only example I can think of involves the question mark. But in this case, the British way is equally as bad as the American way.

for example:

She said, "The store is only open on Sunday??"
If the woman is asking a question, how does the British way handle this?

Or

Did she say, "The store is only open on Sunday?"
If the woman is making a statement, how does the American way handle this?

You say that the American style forces you to add punctuation to quotes, but by the same turn, the British style forces you to delete punction. Seems equally bad. But maybe there's another example that I'm not thinking of.


I've never seen double question marks in any form of grammar. That seems a wee bit bizarre. Punctuation in the British style belongs inside the quotation marks if it belongs to the quote. Therefore, if the woman in your example is asking a question, the question mark belongs inside the quotation marks. It is not forced out, if that is what you mean. It is not doubled, either.

There are many, many examples of altered meaning with unintended punctuation placed inside the quotation marks. For example, to quote you,
you wrote:
"If the woman is asking a question."
In fact, I quoted only part of your sentence, yet American punctuation demands that if the sentence (not the quote) is finished, it is rendered as a complete quotation. It is not and can lead to ambiguity.

Quote:
"The store is only open on Sunday?"


Question:
Br. - "The store is only open on Sunday?"
Am. - "The store is only open on Sunday?"
Partial statement:
Br. - "The store is only open on Sunday".
Am. - "The store is only open on Sunday."
Complete statement:
Br - "The store is only open on Sunday."
Am. - "The store is only open on Sunday."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
billybrobby



Joined: 09 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The double question mark isn't important, don't pay attention to it.

I originally thought you were for always putting punctuation outside the quotation because you said this:

Quote:
It is actually grammatically correct and extremely logical to place the punctuation outside the quotation marks where it doesn't affect the meaning of the quotation. It is counterintuitive and illogical to put it anywhere else.


But I guess I was misinterpreting it. I now see you are in favor of a flexible system that puts it inside or outside as needed. Which is good. Umm...yay for British punctuation. Now if you would change the illogical spelling of "theatre".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

billybrobby wrote:
The double question mark isn't important, don't pay attention to it.

I originally thought you were for always putting punctuation outside the quotation because you said this:

Quote:
It is actually grammatically correct and extremely logical to place the punctuation outside the quotation marks where it doesn't affect the meaning of the quotation. It is counterintuitive and illogical to put it anywhere else.


But I guess I was misinterpreting it. I now see you are in favor of a flexible system that puts it inside or outside as needed. Which is good. Umm...yay for British punctuation. Now if you would change the illogical spelling of "theatre".


Why, if the French ever invaded again, you wouldn't have to change any of the signs Wink Argue with that!! Smile

This thread has been more interesting that I thought it would be. Also educational.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:47 pm    Post subject: Re: phone numbers Reply with quote

laogaiguk wrote:
By the way, I got assauted by___ and Jessica Alba last night in Itaewon!


How is his right hook?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Novernae



Joined: 02 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

billybrobby wrote:
Now if you would change the illogical spelling of "theatre".


Why is 're' illogical? Maybe it's the other way around?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Colorado



Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Location: Public School with too much time on my hands.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partial statement:
Br. - "The store is only open on Sunday".
Am. - "The store is only open on Sunday."

Incorrect.

American for a partial quotation would be:

"The store is only open on Sunday..."

Would BR be "The store is only open on Sunday" ... ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
billybrobby



Joined: 09 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novernae wrote:
billybrobby wrote:
Now if you would change the illogical spelling of "theatre".


Why is 're' illogical? Maybe it's the other way around?


cuz it's not spelled like it's pronounced. Or do British people say it like thea-tray?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International