Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Canada's Arctic Sovereignty

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Manner of Speaking



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:17 pm    Post subject: Canada's Arctic Sovereignty Reply with quote

Quote:
'Who's guarding our back door?'


ED STRUZIK FOR THE TORONTO STAR


In the fall of 1986, foreign policy parliamentarians criss-crossing the country kept hearing Canadians speak out about Arctic sovereignty. The Arctic has immense oil reserves and mineral wealth, but Canada has been slow to protect its northern sovereignty
Nov 18, 2007 04:30 AM



CHURCHILL, Man.–In the fall of 1998, a Russian IL-76 flew over the North Pole to the tiny sub-Arctic town of Churchill on the shores of western Hudson Bay. Mike Lawson, who was on airport duty, remembers it well.

"We don't get big Russian planes like that in Churchill," he says of the Il-76, an unforgettably large cargo plane that is even bigger than the C-130 Hercules used by the Canadian military. "In fact, in the 18 years I've been here, I've seen only one other like it."

Even more unusual was the pilot switching off his landing lights the moment he hit the tarmac – despite blowing snow and marginal visibility.

The crew members were spotted drinking beer at Gypsies, a popular restaurant, at 10 a.m. the next morning, but they didn't stay long. A Bell 206 helicopter landed at Churchill that day, and the Russians drove back to the airport, dropped the plane's cargo doors, loaded the helicopter and took off.

"Just like that," says Lawson. "No one was there to ask questions or inspect documents. It makes you wonder who's guarding our back door."

It turns out Canadian intelligence officials were aware of the flight of the IL-76 and monitored its return to a region of Russia known for organized crime. Whether they let the Russians arrive and depart unfettered for intelligence purposes, or whether they were powerless to intervene, no one will say.

For Col. Pierre Leblanc, commander of Canada's northern forces at the time, the significance of the incident became clear the following year when a Chinese research ship, armed with machine guns, showed up unannounced at the tiny Inuit community of Tuktoyaktuk, ostensibly to meet a Chinese tour guide who had claimed refugee status in 1993.

If Canada's back door is vulnerable to suspicious entries like these two incidents, Leblanc wondered, what might it be like in 20 or 30 years if climate change melts sea ice sufficiently to open the country's Arctic waterways. Could the military or the Canadian Coast Guard stop a rogue ship if it took a run through the Northwest Passage to save 9,000 kilometres of ocean travel? Or stop a tanker from taking a load of fresh water from an Arctic river or lake?

Could Transport or Environment Canada clean up an oil or fuel spill if a tanker like the Exxon Valdez was damaged by ice and spilled its cargo? And what about a ship that might be trying to smuggle in illegal immigrants?

To answer those questions, Leblanc set up the Arctic Security Interdepartmental Working group. Representatives from the military, the RCMP, CSIS, Foreign Affairs, Revenue Canada and Immigration meet biannually to assess Arctic security issues.

Eight years later, Leblanc, now retired but still very much involved in the sovereignty and security debate, is still looking for the answers to an issue that made headlines recently when Russians, Danes and Americans – all of whom dispute Canada's claims over the Arctic and its immense oil reserves and mineral wealth – made loud forays into Canadian waters.

For Leblanc, the unannounced passing of a U.S. submarine in 2006 through or very near Canadian waters – no one in Canada knows for certain– was proof that Canada does not have control over the Arctic.

http://www.thestar.com/ArcticInPeril/article/277429
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
loose_ends



Joined: 23 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Canada's Arctic Sovereignty Reply with quote

Manner of Speaking wrote:
Quote:
'Who's guarding our back door?'


ED STRUZIK FOR THE TORONTO STAR


In the fall of 1986, foreign policy parliamentarians criss-crossing the country kept hearing Canadians speak out about Arctic sovereignty. The Arctic has immense oil reserves and mineral wealth, but Canada has been slow to protect its northern sovereignty
Nov 18, 2007 04:30 AM



CHURCHILL, Man.�In the fall of 1998, a Russian IL-76 flew over the North Pole to the tiny sub-Arctic town of Churchill on the shores of western Hudson Bay. Mike Lawson, who was on airport duty, remembers it well.

"We don't get big Russian planes like that in Churchill," he says of the Il-76, an unforgettably large cargo plane that is even bigger than the C-130 Hercules used by the Canadian military. "In fact, in the 18 years I've been here, I've seen only one other like it."

Even more unusual was the pilot switching off his landing lights the moment he hit the tarmac � despite blowing snow and marginal visibility.

The crew members were spotted drinking beer at Gypsies, a popular restaurant, at 10 a.m. the next morning, but they didn't stay long. A Bell 206 helicopter landed at Churchill that day, and the Russians drove back to the airport, dropped the plane's cargo doors, loaded the helicopter and took off.

"Just like that," says Lawson. "No one was there to ask questions or inspect documents. It makes you wonder who's guarding our back door."

It turns out Canadian intelligence officials were aware of the flight of the IL-76 and monitored its return to a region of Russia known for organized crime. Whether they let the Russians arrive and depart unfettered for intelligence purposes, or whether they were powerless to intervene, no one will say.

For Col. Pierre Leblanc, commander of Canada's northern forces at the time, the significance of the incident became clear the following year when a Chinese research ship, armed with machine guns, showed up unannounced at the tiny Inuit community of Tuktoyaktuk, ostensibly to meet a Chinese tour guide who had claimed refugee status in 1993.

If Canada's back door is vulnerable to suspicious entries like these two incidents, Leblanc wondered, what might it be like in 20 or 30 years if climate change melts sea ice sufficiently to open the country's Arctic waterways. Could the military or the Canadian Coast Guard stop a rogue ship if it took a run through the Northwest Passage to save 9,000 kilometres of ocean travel? Or stop a tanker from taking a load of fresh water from an Arctic river or lake?

Could Transport or Environment Canada clean up an oil or fuel spill if a tanker like the Exxon Valdez was damaged by ice and spilled its cargo? And what about a ship that might be trying to smuggle in illegal immigrants?

To answer those questions, Leblanc set up the Arctic Security Interdepartmental Working group. Representatives from the military, the RCMP, CSIS, Foreign Affairs, Revenue Canada and Immigration meet biannually to assess Arctic security issues.

Eight years later, Leblanc, now retired but still very much involved in the sovereignty and security debate, is still looking for the answers to an issue that made headlines recently when Russians, Danes and Americans � all of whom dispute Canada's claims over the Arctic and its immense oil reserves and mineral wealth � made loud forays into Canadian waters.

For Leblanc, the unannounced passing of a U.S. submarine in 2006 through or very near Canadian waters � no one in Canada knows for certain� was proof that Canada does not have control over the Arctic.

http://www.thestar.com/ArcticInPeril/article/277429



good find.

will Canada be next?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cbclark4



Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Location: Masan

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

next what?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cbclark4 wrote:
next what?


The next country, after America, to be taken over by secret armies funded by the U.N. Duh.

In America, they are going to come out from secret bunkers scattered around the country. Canada is going to be a straight up invasion from the artic. Damn they are smart! taking out our first line of defence during the initial assault wave. With all our secret Inuit commando divisions taken out early, we will have no defence!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cbclark4 wrote:
next what?


Next what Canada always does. We talk it over. Either that or Bomarc missiles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
cbclark4 wrote:
next what?


Next what Canada always does. We talk it over
. Either that or Bomarc missiles.


Thanks for reminding me of one BIG reason to be proud to be Canadian.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agentX



Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Location: Jeolla province

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Canada's Arctic Sovereignty Reply with quote

Manner of Speaking wrote:
"Just like that," says Lawson. "No one was there to ask questions or inspect documents.
It makes you wonder who's guarding our back door."

It turns out Canadian intelligence officials were aware of the flight of the IL-76 and monitored its return to a region of Russia known for organized crime. Whether they let the Russians arrive and depart unfettered for intelligence purposes, or whether they were powerless to intervene ... no one will say.


That's pretty fuc*ed up.

They'd only be powerless to intervene if they were ordered to STAND DOWN.

Why has this NOT been discussed in Canada's Parliament? Confused

Professional criminals indeed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Canada's Arctic Sovereignty Reply with quote

igotthisguitar wrote:
Why has this NOT been discussed in Canada's Parliament? Confused


This would not come up in Question Period? Please. The opposition will excoriate the government on the most minor point. I would think anything about this hitting the papers would generate discussion during Question Period.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neither the US, Denmark or Russia are threatening Canada's rights to exploit potential oil.gas in the Arctic. The newly claimed area by Russia is not an extension of Canada continental shelf. The only area where there is any disoute is in the US - Yukon area. The US claims an extension of the Alaska/Yukon border should go straight north and Canada says it should follow the parallel of longitude.

The dispute is whether the North West Passage, the route between the Islands is an international waterway or Canadian territory.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

contrarian wrote:
The dispute is whether the North West Passage, the route between the Islands is an international waterway or Canadian territory.


It sure is within Canadian territory. However so is the Suez and Panama canal (within Egypt and Panama). You won't get far in the world if you declare those water ways restricted to open access.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A better example might be the straight between Singapore and Indonesia.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sojourner1



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Location: Where meggi swim and 2 wheeled tractors go sput put chug alugg pug pug

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What if illegal aliens sought to get to North America by walking to Canada? I believe it could be done with the cold weather equipment and provisions and dogs to pull sleds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
contrarian



Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Nearly in NK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those SOuth Asians will do anyhting to get into Canada.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What if illegal aliens sought to get to North America by walking to Canada?


Possibly the poster means illegal aliens from inside the Earth (IGTG posted a map recently).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International