|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:30 pm Post subject: Esl Cafe Posters agree with Al-Zawahri |
|
|
in_seoul_2003 : Bush a liar in war on terror By BASSEM MROUE, Associated Press Writer
16 minutes ago[/b]
Al-Qaida No. 2 Ersatz Professor called President Bush a failure and a liar in the war on terror in a video statement released Friday, and he compared Pope Benedict XVI to the 11th century pontiff who launched the First Crusade.
"Can't you be honest at least once in your life, and admit that you are a deceitful liar who intentionally deceived your nation when you drove them to war in Iraq?" Osama bin Laden's deputy said, appearing in front of a standing lamp and a small, decorative cannon.
Ersatz Professor also criticized Bush for continuing to imprison al-Qaida leaders in prisons, including al-Qaida No. 3 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged Sept. 11 mastermind who was captured in Pakistan in March 2003.
"Bush, you deceitful charlatan, 3 1/2 years have passed since your capture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, so how have you found us during this time? Losing and surrendering? Or are we launching attacks with God's help and becoming martyrs?" he said.
"What you have perpetrated against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other Muslim captives in your prisons and the prisons of your slaves in Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan and elsewhere is not hidden from anyone, and we are a people who do not sleep under oppression and who do not abandon our revenge until our chests have been healed of those who have committed aggression against us," he said.
"And we, by the grace of Allah, are seeking to exact revenge on behalf of Islam and Muslims from you and your soldiers and allies."
Al-Zawahri accused the United States and its agents of torturing Muslim prisoners seized across the Middle East.
"Your agents in the Arabian Peninsula, Yemen, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan have captured thousands of the youth and soldiers of Islam whom you made to taste at your hands and the hands of your agents various types of punishment and torture," al-Zawahri said.
Ben Venzke, head of the Virginia-based IntelCenter, which monitors terrorism communications, said al-Zawahri essentially gave al-Qaida's spin on the arrests and detentions of its leaders.
"They are countering arguments that individuals have been able to provide useful information," he said. "And they are continuing to reinforce their intentions for revenge."
Al-Zawahri said Benedict is reminiscent of Pope Urban II, who in 1095 ordered the First Crusade to establish Christian control in the Holy Land.
"This charlatan Benedict brings back to our memories the speech of his predecessor charlatan Urban II in the 11th century ... in which he instigated Europeans to fight Muslims and launch the Crusades because he (Urban) claimed 'atheist Muslims, the enemies of Christ' are attacking the tomb of Jesus Christ, peace be upon him," al-Zawahri said.
Igotthisguitar 's remarks about Benedict were a clear response to the pontiff's comments this month that sparked outrage across the Muslim world. In that speech, Benedict cited a Byzantine emperor who characterized some of the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad as "evil and inhuman," particularly "his command to spread by the sword the faith."
"If Benedict attacked us, we will respond to his insults with good things. We will call upon him and all of the Christians to become Muslims who do not recognize the Trinity or the crucifixion," al-Zawahri said.
Al-Zawahri also called a U.N. resolution to send peacekeepers into Sudan's war-torn Darfur region a "Crusader plan" and implored the Muslims of Darfur to defend themselves.
"There is a Crusader plan to send Crusaders forces to Darfur that is about to become a new field of the Crusades war. Oh, nation of Islam, rise up to defend your land from the Crusaders aggression who are coming wearing United Nations masks," he said. "No one will defend you (Darfur) but a popular holy war."
The nearly 18-minute statement, titled "Bush, the Pope, Darfur and the Crusades," was produced by al-Qaida's media arm, as-Sahab, and made available by the IntelCenter. An initial segment shows al-Zawahri in an office-type setting, while in the second part he is in front of a brown backdrop. The first segment also has English subtitles.
After conducting a technical analysis of the videotape, the CIA concluded "with confidence" that the speaker is in fact Ayman al-Zawahri, said a CIA spokesperson who spoke on condition of anonymity
An intelligence official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said U.S. experts view the latest video as a typical propaganda message, whose main thrust is a call for more people to join the jihad, or holy war.
It wasn't immediately clear when the message was recorded, the official said, but al-Zawahri's reference to the pope indicated the message was produced sometime after Benedict's Sept. 12 comments about Islam.
Al-Qaida has released a string of videos to coincide with the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, showing increasingly sophisticated production techniques in a likely effort to demonstrate that it remains a powerful, confident force despite the U.S.-led war on terror.
The IntelCenter said Friday's video was the 48th released by the al-Qaida Web site this year, three times more than last year's number � which had been the highest. It said al-Zawahri has appeared in 14 of the 2006 videos.[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think you should compare someone who believes Bush totally forked up the war on terror and has only increased terrorism by attacking a target that wasn't at all the center international terrorism with someone cutting people's heads off. That's not honest.
There is room for dissent, even in America? No? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Al-Zawahri said he preferred real butter on his toast to soya margerine. Big_Bird agreed. "Give me real natural dairy products over that nasty genetically engineered sythetic stuff any day of the month!" she commented. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| There is room for dissent, even in America? No? |
Absolutely, and especially in America.
I am not sure that consistently arguing that a political system and its leaders are rotten to the core, utterly depraved, indeed "evil," is an example of mere "dissent," though. Especially when these same "dissenters" cheer on America's self-declared enemies and even adopt their worldviews.
Dissenters usually apply dispassionate, logical arguments to voice alternative views or offer constructive criticism. Compare and contrast, for example, U.S. Supreme Court majority vs. dissenting opinions on various and heated matters. (And do not deny that Supreme Court dissenters feel extremely passionate about their dissenting views on matters such as Rowe vs. Wade, either.)
I am not asking a rhetorical question, Mindmetoo, when I ask you to describe what you believe these so-called dissenters' objectives are... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boodleheimer

Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Location: working undercover for the Man
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| Al-Zawahri said he preferred real butter on his toast to soya margerine. Big_Bird agreed. "Give me real natural dairy products over that nasty genetically engineered sythetic stuff any day of the month!" she commented. |
you DO!! you DO agree with him! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Dissenters usually apply dispassionate, logical arguments to voice alternative views or offer constructive criticism. Compare and contrast, for example, U.S. Supreme Court majority vs. dissenting opinions on various and heated matters. (And do not deny that Supreme Court dissenters feel extremely passionate about their dissenting views on matters such as Rowe vs. Wade, either.) |
Gopher, take the shoe out of your mouth (or fork out of your .....).
That you even dare to say what dissent is --- and frame it as some dispassionate legalistic discourse is nonsense! Dissent doesn't get framed into someone's window view.....it reaches and perforates and is air (which travels, changes form (as any gas).
Your thinking is EXACTLY what is wrong with America. Which doesn't listen and only thinks dissent is some politicized, sanitized verbiage........America, the powerful center has an obligation to listen to, change, adapt according to those who would dissent -- in whatever form. This is what makes the American system work and which at present with its , don't dare say boo against us.....is exactly what is wrong. .....
God forbid we have a Bryant or a Paine among us now.......we wouldn't know what to do, he'd also never get an ear.
DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mindmetoo, please do not be distracted by Ddeubel's usual traducing of my (or or anyone else he cannot converse with like an adult, for that matter) views.
As I am sure you can agree, I neither offered an all-encompassing definition of "dissent," nor did I frame it in an exclusively legal discourse. Rather, as I am sure you can appreciate, I spoke of many dissenters' behavior. Voltaire and others were certainly cynical and sarcastic, but they hardly offered the kind of one-sided worldview we see from the sneering "dissenters" Joo references above.
Most of all, Voltaire and others' kind of dissent is ultimately more persuasive than destructive because they have more to offer than mere bitter resentment and sneering -- calling W. Bush "a Hitler," for example.
In any case, my point is that you can disagree, dissent, and offer alternatives without joining the anarchists or burning cars and buildings during a world trade conference, for example. Cheering Chavez on, to cite another example, will certainly not lead to the people you are trying to persuade to actually listen to what you are saying either.
Do you -- and I am still hoping for an answer from you -- not at least recognize this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ddeubel wrote: |
| Gopher, take the shoe out... |
By the way, Ddeubel, do you have any evidence at all to offer to support the allegations you have made and repeated regarding Chavez in this thread?
Your leaving the thread without either offering such evidence or modifying your allegations is somewhat puzzling...
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=64552 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I'm saying any kind of (non violent) dissent, from people standing outside the White House shouting Bush is a baby killer to cool, reasoned debate. I've always felt societies synthesize a happy middle based on the work of the two extremes.
Weren't the Founding Fathers not only without mercy in regards to their criticisms of King George but were utterly tasteless? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| I guess I'm saying any kind of (non-violent) dissent, from people standing outside the White House shouting Bush is a baby killer to cool, reasoned debate. I've always felt societies synthesize a happy middle based on the work of the two extremes. |
If you are saying that extremists have a dialectical effect, and can thus be useful then I do not think I disagree. But their worldviews, from Ann Coulter and Bill O'Riley to Michael Moore or several posters on this board, are unworthy of much consideration per se, partcularly in their usual shrill, outraged form, where the ones Joo references, yes, tend to show that their opinions coincide with bin Laden, Al-Zawahri, or Hugo Chavez's, for example.
Replacing one of their names for an Al Qaeda name in a news story, then, does not strike me as unreasonable at all. And that seems to have been Joo's point here.
Did Cindy Sheehan not go to Venezuela and openly embrace Hugo Chavez? Did Gore Vidal not visit McVeigh on death row and give his worldview Vidal's stamp of approval? Did far left "dissenters" during the Vietnam era -- from graduate students to Jane Fonda -- not go to Hanoi to express moral support and receive ideological guidance from North Vietnam?
Sauce for the goose, all of it. And it tends to go a little further than mere "dissent."
This notwithstanding, there are constructive ways to dissent. We should aim for that, rather than attacking, denouncing, or hoping for the defeat or overthrow of the U.S. govt. I guess that is the point I make.
So, do these posters want the U.S. to modify its behavior or do they really, simply, just want to see it suffer and then go down in flames? That is not entirely clear to me (and others like Joo, I think). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pligganease

Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Location: The deep south...
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ddeubel wrote: |
Gopher, take the shoe out of your mouth (or fork out of your .....).
That you even dare to say what dissent is and frame it as some dispassionate legalistic discourse is nonsense! Dissent doesn't get framed into someone's window view. It reaches, perforates, and is air (which travels and changes form like any gas).
Your thinking is EXACTLY what is wrong with America, which doesn't listen and only thinks dissent is some politicized, sanitized verbiage... ...America, the powerful center, has an obligation to listen to, change, and adapt according to those who would dissent -- in whatever form. This is what makes the American system work and which at present with its , don't dare say boo against us.....is exactly what is wrong. ..... |
(Sorry, I lost you there. I don't understand what you are saying here enough to try and clean it up.)
| ddeubel wrote: |
God forbid we have a Bryant or a Paine among us now... We wouldn't know what to do. He'd also never get an ear.
DD |
On another thread I said that one of DD's posts was an "incoherant blurb." I want to ask you a question, DD, that will give me more respect for your ideas and your writing.
Are you a native English speaker? If you are, well, OK. You must have gone to the William Shatner School of Melodramatic Writing. If not, congrats on the not-too-bad writing.
When reading your posts, like the one above, I have trouble understanding a thing or two about your choice of grammar. However, this is not uncommon when grading the papers of my students. Like this:
| Quote: |
| America, the powerful center has an obligation to listen to, change, adapt according to those who would dissent -- in whatever form. |
Are you talking to America or about America?
| Quote: |
| Which doesn't listen and only thinks dissent is some politicized, sanitized verbiage... |
Should there be a question mark here? Are you asking us, or was that a part of your previous sentence?
While many of you might think this is petty, I was called out as ignorant by other posters because I called DD's writing incoherant. You must admit that these tiny grammatical clarifications do need to be made in order to accurately understand the author's intent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| Mindmetoo, please do not be distracted by Ddeubel's usual traducing of my (or or anyone else he cannot converse with like an adult, for that matter) views. |
If you're not with us, you're against us. Got it Gombya.
Because the Boston Tea Party was dispassionate. The Revolution was dispassionate. The Declaration of Independence was dispassionate. The Continental Congress was dispassionate. Patrick Henry's comments before his death were dispassionate. MLK was dispassionate. The Cuban Missile Crisis was dispassionate. The Civil War was dispassionate. The Civil Rights movement was dispassionate.
Got it, Gombya. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BLT No-Brainer wrote: |
| If you're not with us, you're against us. Got it Gombya...Because the Boston Tea Party...Got it, Gombya. |
What you have just done, BLT, like our sarcastic friend Big_Bird before you, is to confirm not only that you hold -- and defend anyone else who holds -- extremist views, that is, by citing an entire series of events which you think justifies your position. But, by somehow, at least tacitly, equating all of the actors involved in the events you cite with bin Laden and the others and their position against W. Bush and the United States today, you have also buttressed Joo's case...
So congratulations.
(By the way, there appears to be no apparent relation at all between my quote, the one you single out above, and your "response" to it. Care to clear this up?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| BLT No-Brainer wrote: |
| If you're not with us, you're against us. Got it Gombya...Because the Boston Tea Party...Got it, Gombya. |
What you have just done, BLT, like our sarcastic friend Big_Bird before you, is to confirm not only that you hold -- and defend anyone else who holds -- extremist views, that is, by citing an entire series of events which you think justifies your position. But, by somehow, at least tacitly, equating all of the actors involved in the events you cite with bin Laden and the others and their position against W. Bush and the United States today, you have also buttressed Joo's case...
So congratulations.
(By the way, there appears to be no apparent relation at all between my quote, the one you single out above, and your "response" to it. Care to clear this up?) |
Showing your call for "dispassionate" opposition to be stupidly out of touch with American history and beliefs, I am equating those great people and events with Al Queda?
If you show us to be stupid, you're for Al Queda!!!
Got it, Gombya. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| There is room for dissent, even in America? No? |
Absolutely, and especially in America. |
That's pretty rich, considering that here, you were trying to argue that Michael Moore, the film-maker, and Osama Bin Laden, the terrorist mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, are almost exactly the same, with only the most minor of differences between them.
You seem to like to pay lip service to people's right to disagree with their governments, until they actually do so, and then you accuse them of being traitors, allies of the enemy, and terrorists. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|