View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevieg4ever

Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:41 pm Post subject: Seinfeld - why so big |
|
|
Seinfeld never took off in the UK but i freakin love the show, the main character and the humour. in short everything about it. much better then a lot of uk trash.
can some of the more enlightened posters tell me why was it such a big hit in the states? what does it do that other comedies just simply dont and what are some of your favourite moments from the show?
thanks in advance |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We just got finished pondering the years of Everybody Loves Raymond.
The best answer I can give is: It's an American thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevieg4ever

Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tell me more about this because i for one think that american humour is a lot more subtle and innovative then people give it credit for. and dont have a go at me for spelling 'humour' with two 'u's
VanIslander wrote: |
We just got finished pondering the years of Everybody Loves Raymond.
The best answer I can give is: It's an American thing. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevieg4ever wrote: |
tell me more about this because i for one think that american humour is a lot more subtle and innovative then people give it credit for. |
Seinfeld was innovative, broaching topics that just hadn't been discussed before (eg. the self-love competition). But subtle? Whiny, neurotic and paranoid, yeah,... wimpy, sneaky, petty and extreme, sure.
Please enlighten as the subtlety was lost on me. Formula for the show's success: self-deprecating reductio ad absurdum
Quote: |
and dont have a go at me for spelling 'humour' with two 'u's |
Us Canadians won't, don't worry.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevieg4ever

Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well the second post i meant american humour in general not necessarily seinfeld... i was interested about your 'very american' comment
ill wiki it as well.
VanIslander wrote: |
stevieg4ever wrote: |
tell me more about this because i for one think that american humour is a lot more subtle and innovative then people give it credit for. |
Seinfeld was innovative, broaching topics that just hadn't been discussed before (eg. the self-love competition). But subtle? Whiny, neurotic and paranoid, yeah,... wimpy, sneaky, petty and absurd, sure.
Please enlighten as the subtlety was lost on me.
Quote: |
and dont have a go at me for spelling 'humour' with two 'u's |
Us Canadians won't, don't worry.  |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hollywoodaction
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevieg4ever wrote: |
tell me more about this because i for one think that american humour is a lot more subtle and innovative then people give it credit for. and dont have a go at me for spelling 'humour' with two 'u's
VanIslander wrote: |
We just got finished pondering the years of Everybody Loves Raymond.
The best answer I can give is: It's an American thing. |
|
It wasn't all that innovative. Seinfeld was basically an extended Jackie Mason joke.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iIG48zlBKw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1bG9NUcQ8Y
Last edited by Hollywoodaction on Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mortin21

Joined: 26 Sep 2006 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
as far as the American/British humorous sitcoms comparison, Britain makes a few really good ones, ex. Coupling was far better than Friends (except the last few episodes of Coupling) and the British version of The Office was much better than the American
but for a really good American sitcom with subtle lines, Arrested Development wins out; Seinfeld had its heyday but when the writers came out with another one, Curb your Enthusiasm, which had the same elements (whining, paranoia, etc.) it wasn't funny just annoying
Everbody Loves Raymond had its moments but overall was too staged, the original line never made sense but was funny when the punchline came out
just my thoughts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hollywoodaction
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arrested Development was pretty sweet.
I think there are a lot of great American comedians, by the way. For example, Robin Williams. Amazing delivery. Very theartical. He builds it up to a franctic pace, but then slows it down before it gets uncomfortable for the audience (sometimes by faking a mistake or throwing in a non-sequitur).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4BX5-E_DYU
There are many more great American comedians. Too many to name them all (off the top of my head: Richard Prior, Chris Rock, Jacky Mason, Gilbert Gottfried) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some British humor is great too. One old British guy I met once summed it up pretty well I thought, when he compared the cultures. He said, "America loves a winner, the British love a loser." That might explain the sense of humor differences a bit. There seems to be more self-deprecating humor in British comedy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Seinfeld was popular because it was "a show about nothing." For years so many comedies felt they had to deal with something important from time to time or handle certain subjects with care. (Examples: Sam Malone's drinking problem, Alex P Keaton's drunk uncle, Rosanne-a bunch of terrible stuff, and so on). It was nice to see a group of people who never really grew as people and never wanted to teach the audience a lesson. It was also fun the way the subplots of the four main characters usually interwove at the end somehow.
As for me, I love that show and whoever mentioned "Arrested Development," that's great too. It's a real shame it ended so fast. FOX dropped it not due to lack of popularity, but due to cost (big cast, I think). AFN is now showing it on Saturday nights. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
man, that jackie mason stuff is funny. i only saw him in caddyshack 2 and thought he was a hack. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sina qua non

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's probably because Seinfeld was a stand-up comedian.
The same goes for Everybody Loves Raymond; both of these main characters/show creators worked as stand-up comedians before moving to the sit-com genre.
They both ate or starved in their careers according to whether they were genuinely funny.
We can compare this idea to the case where a sit-com is made and shown as a result of the business clout of the creators, rather than the funniness of the creators. Sit-coms like Rosanne and Cheers had powerful people who drove those shows; with Rosanne, it was Rosanne and her husband Tom Arnold, and with Cheers it was the producer (was that James Burrows?).
To carry this a bit further, if a show earns good viewer ratings, it will no doubt continue. If the show is funny, it will certainly generate good ratings.
However, if a show doesn't necessarily generate good ratings, behind-the-scenes work by influential people can keep it going even if it isn't really entertaining. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
That waiting-for-godot styled Seinfeld where they spend a real-time half-hour in a chinese restaurant was a triumph and kind of sums of the show.
Curb your entusiasm was great for two seasons then it seemed like Larry David was just writing through writers' block.
Arrested Development was about the only network sitcom worth watching in its day. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doogie
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 Location: Hwaseong City
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Probabaly the best writing ever in T.V.. Also, Michael Richards and Jason Alexander. Those 2 characters made the show. Talk to any huge Seinfeld fan and they'll always say,"Who was your favorite character.....George or Kramer?". Next to Archie Bunker, I think they are 2 of the great characters in TV history. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seinfeld is great! But, its success is that it was a boomer fantasy.
They all acted like big kids who never grew up. Money, position, any kind of ambition at all was disdained. Success was all about luck. Nobody worked hard.
It also brought back the idea of the "neighborhood." It was the neighborhood. You knew everyone and dealt with everyone even Newman because they were your neighbors. You just don't see that in 90% or more of America anymore. Today, Seinfeld would have fled his neighborhood for a gated community in Connecticut. Elaine marries and lives in the suburbs too. And, no matter how fun Kramer is, he's left in the innercities to fend for himself.
In the end, they made fun of themselves: self-obsessed and a-moral. For awhile, they made a big deal of karma. They would do bad things and they would be punnished for it. In the end, they all end up in jail. They decided that was what their characters deserved most.
Very American? Maybe. Therea are a lot of American leaders self-obsessed, a-moral and deserving to rot in jail.
And, as for Rosanne Barr. She was a comediane too before making it on TV. She was not a Hollywood power until her show became successfull. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|