View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:44 am Post subject: McCain is dead wrong about Bill Clinton and North Korea. |
|
|
McCain is dead wrong about Bill Clinton and North Korea.
By Fred Kaplan
Posted Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2006, at 4:32 PM ET
Did Clinton "reward" them for doing these things, as McCain claims? Far from it. Not only did he push the U.N. Security Council to consider sanctions, he also ordered the Joint Chiefs of Staff to draw up plans to send 50,000 additional troops to South Korea�bolstering the 37,000 already there�along with more than 400 combat jets, 50 ships, and several battalions of Apache helicopters, Bradley fighting vehicles, multiple-launch rockets, and Patriot air-defense missiles. He also sent in an advance team of 250 soldiers to set up logistical headquarters for the influx of troops and gear.
He sent an explicit signal that removing the fuel rods would cross a "red line." Several of his former aides insist that if North Korea had crossed that line, he would have launched an airstrike on the Yongbyon reactor, even knowing that it might lead to war.
At the same time, Clinton set up a diplomatic backchannel, sending former President Jimmy Carter to Pyongyang for direct talks with Kim Il-Sung, then North Korea's dictator and the father of its present "dear leader," Kim Jong-il. (The official Washington line held that Carter made the trip on his own, but a recent memoir by three former U.S. officials, Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis, acknowledges that Clinton asked him to go.)
This combination of sticks and carrots led Kim Il-Sung to call off his threats�the fuel rods weren't removed, the inspectors weren't kicked out�and, a few months later, to the signing of the Agreed Framework.
McCain called the accord a "failure." This appraisal isn't quite as dead wrong as his claim that Clinton did nothing but toss Kim flowers. But it's highly misleading, to say the least.
http://slate. com/id/2151354/ %20nav/tap2
[Article cut in parts to reduce size, so read the link.] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it's been a shame to watch a man I once considered a proud patriot and American subjugate his ethics and morals to political expediency. He must want the presidency badly. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pligganease

Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Location: The deep south...
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are two schools of thought on this topic...
1) Clinton screwed the pooch. He gave too many things to Lil' Kim ans his papa and sacrificed the security of the peninsula in doing so.
However, this doesn't take into account that all this happened right when the house was taken over by the Republicans who all firmly a) believed this or b) wanted to make the American people believe this in order to diminish the cajones of the Clinton administration.
2) Clinton didn't have enough backing from the newly Republican house to follow up and make good on the promises made by Carter in order to fulfill the agreement.
Personally, I don't care which one you believe. They both lead to the same place.
However, disrespecting McCain for anything is backhanded. If he says he believes something, you should take him at his word. He seems to me to be a man that sticks to his opinions regardless of what others think of him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
He used to be. This is not the only issue on which he's been doing some spin since the last election.
It's sad. I thought he was one of the rare ones. He's just another pol. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
McCain has lost all my respect as well. the fact that he now supports torture is so pathetic. The big hope for him was that if he ran he would get a lot of votes from Dem's and now that will never happen. He is pathetic, and its sad that the Republican machine has so broken and destroyed the man's ethics and morlity, but that happens when you play with the devil. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh please. The North Koreans dropped their plutonium program, but data indicates soon after the frame work they began a uranium based program...with the help of Pakistan's A.Q. Khan. The North Koreans cheated almost as the ink was dry. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
Yes, it's been a shame to watch a man I once considered a proud patriot and American subjugate his ethics and morals to political expediency. He must want the presidency badly. |
Oh so now because McCain believes as many do, and as the evidence showed, that the agreed framework failed and Clinton dropped the ball, McCain isn't a patriot? Get over yourself. He is excercising something called freedom of speech, and he is still a patriot as he is expressing his opinion on what HE believes is right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Atassi
Joined: 14 Feb 2006 Location: 평택
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
NAVFC wrote: |
Oh please. The North Koreans dropped their plutonium program, but data indicates soon after the frame work they began a uranium based program...with the help of Pakistan's A.Q. Khan. The North Koreans cheated almost as the ink was dry. |
And the US didn't hold up their side of the bargain. It's misleading to say that "the North Koreans cheated almost as the ink was dry."
We all agree that NK is bad and a big problem. But why must everyone spin the story as they please? That's the White House's problem now: they probably actually believe all their spin, and in effect they continue doing stupid things.
The talk here of disappointment in McCain reminds me of W. Bush before he was elected. Many of his policies changed drastically when he became president. Blame his cabinet maybe.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Atassi wrote: |
NAVFC wrote: |
Oh please. The North Koreans dropped their plutonium program, but data indicates soon after the frame work they began a uranium based program...with the help of Pakistan's A.Q. Khan. The North Koreans cheated almost as the ink was dry. |
And the US didn't hold up their side of the bargain. It's misleading to say that "the North Koreans cheated almost as the ink was dry."
We all agree that NK is bad and a big problem. But why must everyone spin the story as they please? That's the White House's problem now: they probably actually believe all their spin, and in effect they continue doing stupid things.
The talk here of disappointment in McCain reminds me of W. Bush before he was elected. Many of his policies changed drastically when he became president. Blame his cabinet maybe.... |
The hell we didn't! We sent the North Koreans food and economic aid! We even started building the two light water reactors promised. (Buty whos consturction was halted after it was found out the NKs were cheating)
The North Koreans never had any intention of keeping the bargain, where as the US attempted to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doutdes
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NAVFC wrote: |
Oh please. The North Koreans dropped their plutonium program, but data indicates soon after the frame work they began a uranium based program...with the help of Pakistan's A.Q. Khan. The North Koreans cheated almost as the ink was dry. |
Yes the Norks dropped the plutonium program for the uranium program. Yet strangely enough, the bomb they recently tested was based off of plutonium, not uranium.
Have you ever thought that maybe we knew they were going to cheat and expected them to cheat by using uranium? And we considered that a better option than having them continue a plutonium program that would allow them to make the bomb more quickly and provide them with fisssible material to make more nuclear weapons than a uranium nuclear program would provide. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|