Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Bush Sets Defense As Space Priority

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:13 pm    Post subject: Bush Sets Defense As Space Priority Reply with quote

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/17/AR2006101701484.html

Quote:
President Bush has signed a new National Space Policy that rejects future arms-control agreements that might limit U.S. flexibility in space and asserts a right to deny access to space to anyone "hostile to U.S. interests."

The document, the first full revision of overall space policy in 10 years, emphasizes security issues, encourages private enterprise in space, and characterizes the role of U.S. space diplomacy largely in terms of persuading other nations to support U.S. policy.


Quote:
Bush's top goals are to "strengthen the nation's space leadership and ensure that space capabilities are available in time to further U.S. national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives" and to "enable unhindered U.S. operations in and through space to defend our interests there."

Clinton's top goals were to "enhance knowledge of the Earth, the solar system and the universe through human and robotic exploration" and to "strengthen and maintain the national security of the United States."


Quote:
The issue of possible hostilities in space became more real last month when National Reconnaissance Office Director Donald M. Kerr told reporters that a U.S. satellite had recently been "painted," or illuminated, by a laser in China. Gen. James E. Cartwright, the top U.S. military officer in charge of operations in space, told the newsletter Inside the Pentagon last week that it remained unclear whether China had tried to disrupt the satellite.


My personal opinion on this is that it was bound to happen eventually. It's easy enough to keep a place like Antarctica free of weapons and land claims but then again you don't get a clear shot at the rest of the world from Antarctica.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Possible future weaponization of space = boring?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Meegook



Joined: 12 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anything but. However, too many are so shortsighted in what little thinking they do, they may not realize the implications of your subject.

U.S. National Space Policy

1. Omitted for now.

2. Principles

The conduct of U.S. space programs and activities shall be a top priority, guided by the following principles:

* The United States is committed to the exploration and use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes, and for the benefit of all humanity. Consistent with this principle, "peaceful purposes" allow U.S. defense and intelligence-related activities in pursuit of national interests;

* The United States rejects any claims to sovereignty by any nation over outer space or celestial bodies, or any portion thereof, and rejects any limitations on the fundamental right of the United States to operate in and acquire data from space;

* The United States will seek to cooperate with other nations in the peaceful use of outer space to extend the benefits of space, enhance space exploration, and to protect and promote freedom around the world;

* The United States considers space systems to have the rights of passage through and operations in space without interference. Consistent with this principle, the United States will view purposeful interference with its space systems as an infringement on its rights;

* The United States considers space capabilities -- including the ground and space segments and supporting links -- vital to its national interests. Consistent with this policy, the United States will: preserve its rights, capabilities, and freedom of action in space; dissuade or deter others from either impeding those rights or developing capabilities intended to do so; take those actions necessary to protect its space capabilities; respond to interference; and deny, if necessary, adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to U.S. national interests;

* The United States will oppose the development of new legal regimes or other restrictions that seek to prohibit or limit U.S. access to or use of space. Proposed arms control agreements or restrictions must not impair the rights of the United States to conduct research, development, testing, and operations or other activities in space for U.S. national interests; and

* The United States is committed to encouraging and facilitating a growing and entrepreneurial U.S. commercial space sector. Toward that end, the United States Government will use U.S. commercial space capabilities to the maximum practical extent, consistent with national security.


How much more Orwellian can it get?


Last edited by Meegook on Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meegook wrote:
Anything but. However, too many are so shortsighted in what little thinking they do, they may not realize the implications of your subject.


Rolling Eyes

Anyways, after Bush saying he is going to start funding small yield nuclear bomb testing again, very little surprises me about the massive stupidity of that entire administration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Meegook



Joined: 12 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, the Bush admin. is anything but stupid. In fact, they are very very clever in the proper use of the word. They are getting everything they want while putting billions in their offshore bank accounts at the same time.



btw: What exactly are we doing in that International Space Station anyway?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International