Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Iraq Deathtoll
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tiger fancini



Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Location: Testicles for Eyes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:42 pm    Post subject: Iraq Deathtoll Reply with quote

Quote:
Sunday's killings raised to at least 950 the number of Iraqis who have died in war-related violence this month, an average of more than 40 a day. The toll is on course to make October the deadliest month for Iraqis since April 2005, when the AP began tracking the deaths.

Until this month, the daily average had been about 27. The AP count includes civilians, government officials and police and security forces, and is considered a minimum based on AP reporting. The actual number is likely higher, as many killings go unreported.

The United Nations has said at least 100 Iraqis are now killed daily.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6164965,00.html

Every month it appears to be getting higher and higher. Did this many ever die under Saddam? Apparently this month has also been particularly cruel to US forces.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article1919100.ece

Is this number of deaths truly justifiable? What exactly are all these people dying for?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What exactly are all these people dying for?


The best answer can only come from those people who feel that blowing up housewives going about their business of shopping for the family makes a positive political statement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EFLtrainer



Joined: 04 May 2005

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

While I support in no way the sectarian violence gripping Iraq, ya-ta, your trite response is a disservice to the the issue and those that might stumble onto this thread.

Is it not getting time for sober discussions about these sober topics? While it seemed there was little or not chance to end this debacle short of Dumbya and Cheney having matching heart attacks, the situation is potential changing via the November elections. When you have no choice but to cut your foot off to escape your imprisonment, perhaps black humor and sarcasm are a good defense against bleak reality. But, now, if we mobilize, we could revoke the Bush cadre "mandate" to remake the world in a foul image. If that becomes the new reality, sober thinking is required. There are serious issues at hand.

Do we create special investigation after special investigation to correct the massive destruction the Republican Congress has wrought on the world, our future and our freedoms? Or, do we let bygones be bygones in the name of moving forward and simply reverse course?

What do we do about Peak Oil? Chevron, or one of the big oil companies currently has ads basically admitting Peak Oil is here: Won't you join us? is the tag line to the need to conserve. How do we retool and provide sufficient energy if Peak Oil is, indeed, upon us without massive disruption to the global socio-economic fabric?

What about the Muslim/Christian and/or Fundamentalist/centrist struggle? Is this a schism that can be defused to sustainable levels that will alllow the continued advancement of societies, or are we looking at a struggle that is going to engulf the globe and suck away such a large amount of resources - in conjunction with GW and PO - that we are on the verge of a new Dark Ages (albeit different in form, but possibly as deep relative to today's development)?

Further afield: Global Warming. Can something be done to ameliorate the effects? Do we need to plan the wholesale relocation of tens nee hundreds of millions of people, or do we let Darwinism do what it has always done?

Perhaps we are getting past the point where flippancy is really affordable. Are these serious times for serious people?

So, why are people dying in Iraq? Is it due to malitias simply being evil? Or is it more complex than that? Is it not because we, the people of the United States of America, elected a cadre to office - or allowed them to steal it? Is it not due to the desire to control the world's flow of oil during the first years of Peak Oil? Is it not due to a desire for the dawning of the New American Century and domination of all things economic and political? Is it not due to lie piled upon lie and justified with more lies?

Or is it really just two groups waging religious war against each other?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

EFLtrainer wrote:
While I support in no way the sectarian violence gripping Iraq, ya-ta, your trite response is a disservice to the the issue and those that might stumble onto this thread.

...


Or is it really just two groups waging religious war against each other?


Ya-Ta Boy is right. The people blowing housewives who are shopping up may have complex motivations, but at the end of the day they are blowing up housewives in an ethnic war of mutual extermination.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
cwemory



Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Location: Gunpo, Korea

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
since April 2005, when the AP began tracking the deaths.


I'm curious as to why the tracking of deaths didn't begin until two years after the war began. April 2005 is so late, it's nearly hard to believe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The best answer can only come from those people who feel that blowing up housewives going about their business of shopping for the family makes a positive political statement.


Ya-ta, you say some right on things at times but this is WAY off base. Shows how far and ignorant those of us in the west are.......if we believe they are just "making a statement".

Terror, is not random as those with interests in this, would believe. Terror, is part of the fabric of that it lays down in bed with. This fabric is in Iraq, made of retaliation, made of "war against invaders", is made of containing those who would capitulate with the invaders.

It is NOT gratuituous, however we in the west might view it. It is part of long term war. Strategic and meant to fight those who'd take America's money and run and profit of it.

Blowing up housewives, happens on both sides.....and I don't think for a minute, you'd suggest Americans actually plan on blowing up housewives. Yet it happens and MANY housewives have died from direct American action. HOW? Well read what I said above. It is with reason and in act, not gratuitous, purely facile. On both sides.

DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

people excusing suicide bombers. and some wonder why left-wingers are accused of being morally bankrupt.

DD, are you THAT naive? Do you really think those attacks on markets don't intentionally kill women and children? If you do, I am going to be rude but it needs to be said: get your head out of your ass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
DD, are you THAT naive? Do you really think those attacks on markets don't intentionally kill women and children? If you do, I am going to be rude but it needs to be said: get your head out of your ass.


Please read what I said. Never said they didn't intentionally (meaning, knowingly plant bombs and knowingly understand that there would be civilian (housewives , children) casualties. Never would "excuse it" and it is terrible and tragic and I've said so many times on this board.

What I said was (and why am I even bothering to repeat myself....who has their head up their ass...???) that they are doing more than making a statement when they do such acts. It is much more complex and strategic than just "blowing up innocents".

It is also the case with American troops. They knowingly and thus intentionally kill housewives and children in their own attacks. It is part of their "attack" and effort to combat what they call the insurgency. Both parties do this......

It is just plain stupid to label the so called enemy as just plainly crazy and wanting to kill for the sake of killing. They do not. This has been America's big mistake from the beginning. NOT understanding the culture and by default the enemy. There is much more going on other than -- "they are crazy mother fucks, foaming at the mouth and wanting to kill housewives".

I suggest Yata's view is naive -- and one of the many reasons American military planners are just plain lost. They have their own heads in their ass.

DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DD

You seem to be hung up on my use of the word 'statement' and that I used it as shorthand rather than writing a 250 word double-spaced essay. I think my main point is that no matter what your ideal is, you have no right to committ serial mass murder to achieve that goal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
DD

You seem to be hung up on my use of the word 'statement' and that I used it as shorthand rather than writing a 250 word double-spaced essay. I think my main point is that no matter what your ideal is, you have no right to committ serial mass murder to achieve that goal.


thank you for simply stating what I was thinking. Nice to have someone articulate my own POV for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Turn-about is fair play, BB. You've often done the same for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jhaelin



Joined: 30 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

as we mull over the 'tit for tat' sectarian violence ravaging iraq, with mounting civilian death tolls, and begin to question who's to blame for creating or escalating the situation...

we should consider that little incident which has almost disapeared from our media memory:
of two British Special Forces (SAS) caught in Basra with explosives and weapons in a car, wearing arab disquises (long robes, wigs). they were caught after shooting and killing iraqi police who were chasing them as car bomb suspects. most of you may remember only the British response to this incident. which was when the British army stormed the police prison they were being held in (conveniently before any thorough questioning).

in true "1984" fashion, we rarely hear mention of this. We must rather rely upon independent internet sources to consider the role, impact and importance of "false flag" operations in Iraq.

http://physics911.ca/Compilation:_British_Forces_Conduct_False-Flag_Bombings_in_Iraq
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2005/200905stagedterror.htm

also consider that "golden" mosque bombing that occured in Samarra and was the flash point of the current sectarian 'civil war'. no suspects ever caught, only rumors and usual blame upon Zarqawi at the time.

although no clear evidence exists to substantiate either the official or alternative interpretation of these events, we should consider the following pattern. the destabilzation of any key strategic area in the World has been followed by the justification and solidification of US military presence in the destabilized regions.
Hmmmm, coincidence, or "Resource War" strategy?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Junior



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Location: the eye

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I said right at the start-(3 years back, to the laughter of people on this board) another vietnam...

You can't win a war surrounded by people who may or may not be the enemy and you have no way of knowing. You just become an easy target for cowardly attacks.

Partition the country. the best thing to come out of this would be to create a kurdistan at long last.
Then get out of there and devote forces to better-needed conflicts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Junior wrote:
As I said right at the start-(3 years back, to the laughter of people on this board) another vietnam...


Quote:
Joined: 18 Nov 2005


What was your former username?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I think my main point is that no matter what your ideal is, you have no right to committ serial mass murder to achieve that goal.


Yata. Given this, then I think your statement is meaningless in regards to the situation in Iraq. Why? Well, all those engaged in war CANNOT BUT commit what you call "serial mass murder". Please adjust your glasses. There is not a war or a party to thereof, that is exempt.

Am I right in thinking, you've become a pacifist? I hope so. I certainly am and am clear in saying that you can't expect a war without atrocities. And that is why at the end of the day, war is a VERY last act. A defensive act, an act when all else has been tried and not just thought about.....

What I REALLY think you are saying IS, "these (read - insurgents) are terribly evil men who just kill indiscriminantly. We (read, the caring West), though we err, still do our best to not kill." I roundly, disagree with your attitude, two faced and once again, not sensitive to the culture on the ground, the dynamics of why people do these things.

Sure killing is ALWAYS bad. But it is happening and we'd better try to understand why, rather than just label.



DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International