| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thu_tinh
Joined: 27 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:18 am Post subject: clothing/shoe sizes in Korea |
|
|
clothing sizes in korea are equal to what size in america?
i see all these double digits and is never quite sure.
please educate me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OiGirl

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: Hoke-y-gun
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thu_tinh
Joined: 27 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oh so when you see 55/66/77 thats what it means? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OiGirl

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: Hoke-y-gun
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Those sizes I have not yet figured out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kat2

Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Location: Busan, South Korea
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| According to the subtitles in "Devil Wears Prada" (which is a great indulgent silly chick flick), a size 6 American is equivalent to size 66 Korean. Not sure if I believe this because I'm a size 6, but usually wear the biggest Korean pants they have at the boutiques. Howeve,r I've noticed that the generaly shoddy workmanship means there is a lot of variation in sizes. I'll take that for cheap clothes though. Just try them on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pak Yu Man

Joined: 02 Jun 2005 Location: The Ida galaxy
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Korean sizes are in metric are they not?
Silly Yanks and your inches.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
princess
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: soul of Asia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thu_tinh wrote: |
| oh so when you see 55/66/77 thats what it means? |
55 is like a medium and 66/77 is big. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
princess
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: soul of Asia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yikes! I saw that size chart! Size 6 is not small. I wear waist size 24, 23 in some stuff. That chart says waist size 28 is small? Not in Korea! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OiGirl

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: Hoke-y-gun
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I was talking to a Korean girlfriend about this the other day...the XX/XX/XX sizes are for three parts of the body, although she's not sure either...chest, bust,?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogshed

Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On my trip to Emart (Emart-uh in Korean) I think I figured out the mens sizes. They had a chart and the dress shirts seemed like they were sold in chest sizes like jackets in the US.
The Ebasics T-shirts and underwear came in international size M, L, and XL marked 95, 100 and 105 respectively. I think they may just be a hair smaller than M, L, and XL in Fruit of the Loom.
A chart at the store:
95 38-39 sleeve 80-81
100 40-41 82-83
105 42-43 84-85
110 44-45 86-87
I'm guessing the sleeve is in cm.
The other chart:
height (cm?) waist (inches)
170 이하 30 이하
172 34
175 36
175 이상 38 이상
I had to pay to have the pant legs shortened. They are sold in only one length. The girls did a lot of measuring and talking before getting a guy who spoke English. They don't measure the inseam. They measure the outside seam.
The pants are marked in inches for the waist but there are cm in parenthesis. 82 (32) for example. 32 inches =82 cm? (32 inches is 81.28 cm)
My 32 waist corduroy are just slightly smaller than my other 32 pants I bought. Try on everything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
heydelores

Joined: 24 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I wear a women's size 10 in the US, and I can wear some size 77 clothes or size 30 pants here. Hope this helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peony

Joined: 30 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its basically
55 = 4
66 = 6
77 = 8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kermo

Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| peony wrote: |
its basically
55 = 4
66 = 6
77 = 8 |
I'm inclined to agree, though some 77 sizes are bigger. I went to a department store with my friend last year, feeling pretty pleased with myself for the weight I had lost recently (gained back during a dull trip to Canada, but that's another story.)
She went to each little section, asking "77?" and time after time, we were told to leave the land of cute, stylish, modern clothing, and take the escalor up to cornea-blistering, paisley-patterned AjummaWorld. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|