Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

One fare for disabled, obese, panel told
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:25 pm    Post subject: One fare for disabled, obese, panel told Reply with quote

One fare for disabled, obese, panel told

Quote:
The complaint also includes Linda McKay-Panos, an obese woman whose legal efforts led to a Federal Court of Appeal ruling that found obesity could be considered a disability when people travel by air.


Not talking about the disabled part, just the fatty part. Which is it fatties, you are disabled, or you should be treated normally as there is nothing wrong with being fat? Seriously, which is it? Personally, I figure about 85% (atleast) of fat people are just lazy fatties who are too lazy or fat to get off their butts. The others probably have medical or medicinal reasons.

I used to be fat, got sick of it, lost most of the weight (still have a bit, but most is muscle now). Fat people, unless they have a doctor's note (and that can be abused, but it would still help), should pay for 2 seats on a plane, and never, EVER be put in one seat to make the flight hell for the people sitting next to them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Satori



Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: Above it all

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This could become quite an issue for americans. As planes are pretty huge investments and dont get rotated nearly as fast as things like cars. So the designs will take a long time to catch up with the new american average figure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Satori wrote:
This could become quite an issue for americans. As planes are pretty huge investments and dont get rotated nearly as fast as things like cars. So the designs will take a long time to catch up with the new american average figure.


The seats can be reconfigured. Mainly pitch (leg room) is changed though. Not so easy to change width.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JongnoGuru



Joined: 25 May 2004
Location: peeing on your doorstep

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't seating space in Economy Class getting progressively smaller, not roomier, these days? It sure feels like it. I know airlines differ in this area, but one flight I was on in the summer, my knees would hit the seat in front of me, it generally felt more restrictive than ever I remember, and the (smallish) Korean girl with me was feeling cramped and confined as well. Seems like seating dimensions are contracting while passenger dimensions are expanding. We flew Asia to Europe and didn't see any huge people, even at the airports. Maybe obese people are just giving up on flying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diver



Joined: 16 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Airline passenger weight has more serious consequences than diminishing leg room.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/TRAVEL/02/27/passengers.weight.ap/index.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
schwa



Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Yap

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suggest base airfare on body weight. Wouldnt that be common sense?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SuperHero



Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Location: Superhero Hideout

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

schwa wrote:
I suggest base airfare on body weight. Wouldnt that be common sense?

You pay the fee and then when boarding step on the scale. If you are too heavy then you pay a surcharge, if you are underweight you get a refund. Sounds good to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JongnoGuru wrote:
Isn't seating space in Economy Class getting progressively smaller, not roomier, these days?


http://www.independenttraveler.com/resources/article.cfm?AID=161&category=13
Quote:
The Disappearing Seat: A Myth?
Although the "standard" seat pitch has decreased almost industry-wide from 33-34 inches to more like 31 inches, airlines maintain that leg room has not actually diminished. Instead, the adoption of a higher density seat back that, at 0.5 to 1" thick, was three to four inches thinner than the older padded seat backs afforded the airlines some extra room. They filled the space with more seats (or in some cases moved the space up a class or two), but without taking away any actual leg room.


A general guide to seat sizes: http://www.airlinequality.com/Product/seat_intro.htm

A more detailed guide: http://www.seatguru.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
hairy sue



Joined: 18 May 2006
Location: weewee heaven

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a person can purchase a ticket without having to reveal their physical dimensions the airlines would have to average out and prep seats needed for oversized people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xtchr



Joined: 23 Nov 2004

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SuperHero wrote:
schwa wrote:
I suggest base airfare on body weight. Wouldnt that be common sense?

You pay the fee and then when boarding step on the scale. If you are too heavy then you pay a surcharge, if you are underweight you get a refund. Sounds good to me.



Yep, my version is that everyone gets a set limit, and you can reach it by combining your body weight and your luggage weight. If you're lighter you get to take more luggage than the heavier passengers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
twg



Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SuperHero wrote:
schwa wrote:
I suggest base airfare on body weight. Wouldnt that be common sense?

You pay the fee and then when boarding step on the scale. If you are too heavy then you pay a surcharge, if you are underweight you get a refund. Sounds good to me.

It already takes twelve hours to board a plane...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Badgie



Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Location: Stuck in idle mode

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Personally, I figure about 85% (atleast) of fat people are just lazy fatties who are too lazy or fat to get off their butts.


That's alot of fat-phobic, gratuitous meaness folded into one sentence.

That said, I have to agree that it is distictly unpleasant to have to sit next to a severly over-weight person on a plane. No one should have their flight utterly ruined because the person sitting next to them cannot fit themselves into their assigned seat. If a traveller knows that they are significantly larger than your average joe/jane, they should have two seats for everyone's comfort. Whether or not obesity is a disability is a debate. More of an emotional issue that leads to physical problems. Should airline companies only make them pay for one fare but get two seats? For entirely selfish purposes, I hope that they do.


Fatness is not the only thing that irritates the bejesus out of fellow passengers.

* edited for prattishness


Last edited by Badgie on Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Qinella



Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JongnoGuru wrote:
Isn't seating space in Economy Class getting progressively smaller, not roomier, these days? It sure feels like it. I know airlines differ in this area, but one flight I was on in the summer, my knees would hit the seat in front of me, it generally felt more restrictive than ever I remember, and the (smallish) Korean girl with me was feeling cramped and confined as well. Seems like seating dimensions are contracting while passenger dimensions are expanding. We flew Asia to Europe and didn't see any huge people, even at the airports. Maybe obese people are just giving up on flying.


I'm sitting here with my jaw on the floor, mystified by the fact that the Guru isn't flying first, or at least business, class. What has the world come to?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Green Tea



Joined: 04 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I flew to London last year on AirTransat from Toronto. They are one of these new budget airlines. I am not a large guy, but I found the seating terribly cramped. They obviously stuck as many seats as possible into the plane to maximize profits. Anyone above a 42 inch waist would definitely have had an uncomfortable flight! Fat people would not have fit in the seats because there were hard plastic armrests between each seat that could not be raised. It was a packed flight, so requesting a seat change wasn't possible.

Unless people want to fork out the extra money for a more expensive airline they should really work on losing the fat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Badgie wrote:
Quote:
Personally, I figure about 85% (atleast) of fat people are just lazy fatties who are too lazy or fat to get off their butts.


That's alot of fat-phobic, gratuitous meaness folded into one sentence.



I used to be quite fat. That gives me the ability to say whatever I damn well want to about it Wink But it is true, though the stats might be off somewhat, they aren't that far off. And to be honest, more fat people need that, and less coddling (sp?). It's becoming a MASSIVE problem, back home atleast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International