View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
xCustomx

Joined: 06 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:21 pm Post subject: One of the craziest explanations given to me this morning |
|
|
I was talking to one of the adult students I teach this morning about the temples in Gyungju. He was explaining that people aren't allowed to take pictures of the Buddhas because the flashes from the cameras cause the air to become humid and since the air becomes more humid, the moisture condenses on the top of the ceiling and drips onto the statues/sculptures, thus eroding them. WTH!? I asked him why then, even with the open air temples that have buddhas inside are you still not allowed to take pictures, even when standing far away and using a zoom. He gave the same explanation and that the air that becomes more humid from the flash of the camera might move into the temple. I was trying to hold back from laughing too much |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PaperTiger

Joined: 31 May 2005 Location: Ulaanbataar
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's so rediculous about that? Museums with expensive environmental systems have the same policy, no flash for most kinds of artwork...especially really old ones. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not as bad as my co-workers who don't want to give me a lift to work because they were worried there would be an accident and I would get injured. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about my high school supervisor explaining that the reason kids aren't allowed/encouraged to take university entrance exams more than once is because, "Korea is a poor country and the tests are expensive to make." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xCustomx

Joined: 06 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaperTiger wrote: |
What's so rediculous about that? Museums with expensive environmental systems have the same policy, no flash for most kinds of artwork...especially really old ones. |
I understand about museums, and we even discussed that, but the fact that he believes the flash from a camera can cause the air to heat up and become more humid, even while taking a picture 15 meters away OUTSIDE (and the buddha is inside) is crazy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paddycakes
Joined: 05 May 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like more typical Korean logic to me...
How does a flash add water vapor (humidity) to the air?
The most a flash could do it perhaps heat up the air by .001 degree for a fraction of a second, but that would cause the air to expand, and warm air can hold more water vapor than cooler air so if anything this risk of condensation is lower.
If anything museums frown on flash photography because it disturbs other vistors and makes the place look like Disney land. Really, really old scripts can also be damaged by bright light. I didn't major in history for nothing you know... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bellum99

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: don't need to know
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mostly the museums sell books and postcards of the exhibits. They don't allow flash photography so that only they can sell the high quality photographs. If you can't use the flash then the photgraph looks like crap. They don't want people to make money on the exhibits and they want to sell more to the tourists. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xCustomx wrote: |
PaperTiger wrote: |
What's so rediculous about that? Museums with expensive environmental systems have the same policy, no flash for most kinds of artwork...especially really old ones. |
I understand about museums, and we even discussed that, but the fact that he believes the flash from a camera can cause the air to heat up and become more humid, even while taking a picture 15 meters away OUTSIDE (and the buddha is inside) is crazy |
I could be just a cover. Some Buddhist temples don't want pictures taken of their sacred things. Not often, but it does sometimes happen. I have seen several Westerners not respect their beliefs at all (being arrogant) and still taking pictures, or hiding a bit and then taking them. I have seen this on several occasions, and the guy might just be saying that because that would probably be a better explanation than, "Please respect what we consider sacred and don't take a picture." which doesn't seem to work. Just a theory. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I have seen several Westerners not respect their beliefs at all (being arrogant) and still taking pictures, or hiding a bit and then taking them. I have seen this on several occasions, and the guy might just be saying that because that would probably be a better explanation than, "Please respect what we consider sacred and don't take a picture." which doesn't seem to work. Just a theory. |
It happens all over the world. I agree..it's BS...do you REALLY need a picture?
Western museums have thoe "no camera/flash" rule for a couple reasons.
It's thought that the flash degrades the paint/colour on the canvas of older paintings.
I also think they don't want pictures taken so people will have to buy postcards and books and crap....
"Please do not take pictures" should be a simple enough request. I think you have to be pretty damn dumb to not follow it.
Ditto with people getting out of their car and taking pictures of elk from only a few feet away. "don't worry sweetheart... He's tame look..he's eating this right outta my.....HOLY SH!TT!!!"
SS and GB have good ones too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xCustomx

Joined: 06 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some of you are missing the point. I know why photographs are not allowed in some places. I was laughing at my student's reasoning, which makes no sense at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aren't Koreans every the masters of absurd excuses to explain things that are just plain stupid? Some of the stuff my school district has come up with has been pretty priceless. Do they really think we're so stupid as to believe it and not realise straight off that the reason for ______________ is that they're being moronic, xenophobic asses? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ysl
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i took some pictures in that temple, except my last shot, some stupid automatic function turned the flash back on
they wont beat you up or anything...they are monks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So the humid Korean Summer must just about melt away poor old Buddha! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hyeon Een

Joined: 24 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ysl wrote: |
they wont beat you up or anything...they are monks |
I wouldn't be so sure, Korean monks can be pretty tough. The riot police have been called in on them more than a few times. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajgeddes

Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Location: Yongsan
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ysl wrote: |
i took some pictures in that temple, except my last shot, some stupid automatic function turned the flash back on
they wont beat you up or anything...they are monks |
Way to show some respect. I should go around punching 6 year old girls too, they aren't going to beat me up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|