Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Do we need a budget commission?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:04 am    Post subject: Do we need a budget commission? Reply with quote

"The public debt is the amount owed to individual investors, including foreign countries, but excluding money the government owes to its own trust funds. It has soared from $5.8 trillion to $7.6 trillion this year alone � and is more than half the size of the nation's economy for the first time since 1956...

The focus is on the White House as President Obama prepares his State of the Union address and 2011 budget. Lawmakers and lobbyists seeking to cut the record $1.4 trillion budget deficit and stabilize the debt want Obama to back the creation of a commission that would recommend spending cuts and tax increases and require a vote by Congress. It's a process that has worked since the 1980s on military base closings.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-12-30-debt_N.htm

I'm not in favor of a commission since we elect a Congress to do the work the commission would be tasked to do. However, given how Congress is structured to operate, it may be the only way to address the problem.

At this point, I say give Congress one year to show what they can do. If they fail, then try a commission the next year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:15 am    Post subject: Re: Do we need a budget commission? Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:


I'm not in favor of a commission since we elect a Congress to do the work the commission would be tasked to do. However, given how Congress is structured to operate, it may be the only way to address the problem.

At this point, I say give Congress one year to show what they can do. If they fail, then try a commission in 2011.


Doesn't Congress create commissions all the time? Administrative agencies are similar in their function to commissions, invested with a task and parameters by Congress and overseen by the President.

You're certainly right that Congress' structure makes it hard to cut spending in each Representative's prized district. Let's create the commission, and let them propose a budget cut on discretionary spending which Congress can approve or disapprove. Fiscal responsibility is too important to the future of our country to fail to act.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a Washington Post editorial on the same topic.

"President Obama has voiced support for such a plan, and 35 Democratic and Republican senators have signed on to legislation that would create a bipartisan commission with broad power to force painful spending cuts and tax increases through Congress.

Even House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), an ardent opponent of the idea, has signaled in recent weeks that she could accept the establishment of a commission. The White House has been talking to Congress to try to craft a proposal that would not wholly relinquish congressional control over major decisions on taxes and spending."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One part of the solution is taxes:

America must overcome its allergy to taxes

"Americans have not always hated taxes. The marginal tax rate was approximately 90% for the wealthiest Americans during World War II, but 85% to 90% of the public still described their tax rate as fair. In the mid-20th century, new payroll taxes were enacted to help pay for Social Security and Medicare, while federal taxes helped fund the Interstate Highway System, strengthened research and education at America's premier public universities and built the world's most powerful military."

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/12/29/2009-12-29_america_must_overcome_its_allergy_to_taxes.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Fiscal responsibility is too important to the future of our country to fail to act.


I would probably agree if tax rates up to 90%, which we had during WWII, are on the table for discussion. As long as people only see budget cuts--meaning others give up something--as the only solution, then I'm not convinced they really put much stock in fiscal responsibility. In those cases, they seem to be attached to "Don't tax thee and don't tax me, tax that fella behind the tree'.

Either we're all in this together or we ain't. If we are, then shared sacrifice is the name of the game. If we ain't, then screw the future--I'm keepin' what's mine. When I started working, I was taxed to pay for my grandparents' generation; later on, for my parents' generation. If the plot now is to screw my generation in order to finance a cushy life for the next generation, I ain't buyin' it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rusty Shackleford



Joined: 08 May 2008

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Fiscal responsibility is too important to the future of our country to fail to act.


I would probably agree if tax rates up to 90%, which we had during WWII, are on the table for discussion. As long as people only see budget cuts--meaning others give up something--as the only solution, then I'm not convinced they really put much stock in fiscal responsibility. In those cases, they seem to be attached to "Don't tax thee and don't tax me, tax that fella behind the tree'.

Either we're all in this together or we ain't. If we are, then shared sacrifice is the name of the game. If we ain't, then screw the future--I'm keepin' what's mine. When I started working, I was taxed to pay for my grandparents' generation; later on, for my parents' generation. If the plot now is to screw my generation in order to finance a cushy life for the next generation, I ain't buyin' it.


90% taxes would lead to a DECREASE in the total tax take. The more you increase taxes, the less those people that actually produce something, produce. Why would you work an extra hour or expand production, if you were only getting a 10c on the dollar return on the effort. A complete dunce could see this, so why does this tripe still get trotted out?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
One part of the solution is taxes:

America must overcome its allergy to taxes

"Americans have not always hated taxes. The marginal tax rate was approximately 90% for the wealthiest Americans during World War II, but 85% to 90% of the public still described their tax rate as fair. In the mid-20th century, new payroll taxes were enacted to help pay for Social Security and Medicare, while federal taxes helped fund the Interstate Highway System, strengthened research and education at America's premier public universities and built the world's most powerful military."

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/12/29/2009-12-29_america_must_overcome_its_allergy_to_taxes.html


The American tax burden is already terrible. Second highest corporate taxes on earth. Everything that moves is taxed. Plus the inflation tax.

http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/component/content/article/33-BearLair/10311
Quote:
The current political-economic system is simply unsustainable; no economy can afford to pay for four giant zombie financial institutions, two substantial military adventures, a zombie-driven housing market, an exploding health-care bill and Goldman Sachs partners' lifestyle aspirations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reggie



Joined: 21 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hopefully, we'll hit our credit card limit with our lenders soon and will have to stop living like the welfare queen America has become.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Fiscal responsibility is too important to the future of our country to fail to act.


I would probably agree if tax rates up to 90%, which we had during WWII, are on the table for discussion. As long as people only see budget cuts--meaning others give up something--as the only solution, then I'm not convinced they really put much stock in fiscal responsibility. In those cases, they seem to be attached to "Don't tax thee and don't tax me, tax that fella behind the tree'.

Either we're all in this together or we ain't. If we are, then shared sacrifice is the name of the game. If we ain't, then screw the future--I'm keepin' what's mine. When I started working, I was taxed to pay for my grandparents' generation; later on, for my parents' generation. If the plot now is to screw my generation in order to finance a cushy life for the next generation, I ain't buyin' it.


The problem is, Ya-Ta, you have to have a generational foundation, and we're no longer in a period of farmers' fertility. To provide the same support the previous generation got without cuts will require a larger tax burden.

Anyway, its really odd for a boomer to make the above argument. Its like a Southerner travelling forward in time from the 1850s to lecture us on race relations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Fiscal responsibility is too important to the future of our country to fail to act.


I would probably agree if tax rates up to 90%, which we had during WWII, are on the table for discussion. As long as people only see budget cuts--meaning others give up something--as the only solution, then I'm not convinced they really put much stock in fiscal responsibility. In those cases, they seem to be attached to "Don't tax thee and don't tax me, tax that fella behind the tree'.

Either we're all in this together or we ain't. If we are, then shared sacrifice is the name of the game. If we ain't, then screw the future--I'm keepin' what's mine. When I started working, I was taxed to pay for my grandparents' generation; later on, for my parents' generation. If the plot now is to screw my generation in order to finance a cushy life for the next generation, I ain't buyin' it.


The problem is, Ya-Ta, you have to have a generational foundation, and we're no longer in a period of farmers' fertility. To provide the same support the previous generation got without cuts will require a larger tax burden.

Anyway, its really odd for a boomer to make the above argument. Its like a Southerner travelling forward in time from the 1850s to lecture us on race relations.


US population 1960: 179,323,175 (end of the baby boom)
US population 2000: 281,421,906

...and we've passed 300,000,000. While fertility is down, immigration is way up.

As I said, I'm not opposed to cuts in benefits if I see that everyone is sharing the burdens of fixing the problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International