|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gorgias
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:26 pm Post subject: Agricultural Reform Now! |
|
|
I doubt too many will care, but Korea, in my Canadian Prairies opinion, is in need of an agricultural revolution. Having been throught the country-side many times now, I am shocked that 1) a lot of farming is done by hand, even rice; and 2) that farms are so very small. In the US there are Kellog's farms as big as Kyeonggi-Do, and in Canada, there are McCain's farms of about the same size. Rice is expensive in Korea, and produce SHOCKING!!!!!!!!!!
Korea is going through the same growing pains that Canada and the States did ten and twenty years ago (and Europe is going through now). In time, unless the farmers get the upper hand, the "small-time farmers" will be bought out by the "big-time farmers" who will inturn become or be be bought out by the corporations.
Korea ought to let this process occur. Yes, "a way of life" will be lost, however, Korea needs a) mechanization of agricultural production, and b) large scale farmers. These two go hand-in-hand: the farmer with a quarter hectare of rice can obviously not afford to purchase a quarter billion won rice thresher or combine. For a country so adept at mass-production, the agricultural system is 19th century.
For the sake of Korean children (and English teachers), President Rho, please institute a policy of massive agricultural reform! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cedar
Joined: 11 Mar 2003 Location: In front of my computer, again.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For crying out loud. Educate yourself before you post such drivel.
---hint--- they keep trying to reform in many ways, but farming is a powerful lobby. President Noh would LOVE to institute a trillion reforms, but uh, it's a democracy. Also, the biggest impetus on agricultural reforms now is the WTO agreements, even Noh would rather wriggle out of some of the ruckus this is stirring up!
---another hint--- Canada can have large farms cause they have large pieces of contiguous land without elevation gains and losses allover.
----one last hint---- rice farming is wet farming and doesn't work the way the wheat and corn you are used to works.
I freaking hate it when hagwon jockeys try to say they know the way to change all of Korea for the better before they've even learned the complexity of the issue.
Last edited by Cedar on Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:35 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swiss James

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
really? That Grapes Of Wrath book didn't really paint a rosy picture of the big farms- and isn't mass farming in China part of the reason we get yellow dust storms every year?
I've never heard anyone say it's a good idea before |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gorgias
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
@Cedar, whoa Cujo, down boy. Educate yourself.
---hint---Rice harvesting is an almost identicle process to wheat, flax, canola or any other grain harvesting. Planting is different, but mechanizable none the less. Click here to see some cool pictures of combines, and rice combines produced by International Harvester.
---another hint---Contiguous land is not super important, as it is actually possible for a reaper or bailer to drive from one valley to the next. The Korean country-side has a super infrastructure of highways and irrigation that are already perfectly suited to "big-time" agricultural operations. Further more, almost the entire western half of South Korea from Kyeonggi to Jeolla is fairly topographically level.
----one last hint----Korea has the sort of deep rooted culture and pride that, say, France has, but the the sort of market driven internal economy that America has; if or no Korea will go one way or the other will be interesting to see. Hopefully, for the sake of those who do not want to pay just about five dollars for a pear, Korea will follow the latter path and avoid succumbing to the romanticism and frankly: farmer-terrorists as France has.
I'm not speading soap and Christianity, obviously the complexities of agricultural reform in Korea are to some degree beyond me, none the less, having spent about twenty-five years on and around farms, and a few years in Korea and her country side, I feel I'm at least semi-entitled to note my observations on the topic.
Sorry if my caps and hyperbole drew you, @Cedar, to post such drivel on a topic you clearly have zero education about.
@Swiss James, big farms are not all rosy, and the migrant workers they inevitably employ do often suffer a hard lot. The yellow dust, so I've heard, is from the Gobi desert, and is as old as time, so is probably not closely related to modern Chinese agriculteral practices. At any rate, thanks for your level headed in-put. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Large-scale rice cultivation is the norm in the U.S. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ed4444

Joined: 12 Oct 2004
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the open market agricultural debate is a little more complex than explained above.
You couldn't realistically apply the economics of large scale North American farms to Korea.
I do think Korean farming is in dire need of reform however.
I think a total opening of the market would finish off a lot of Korean farmers. This would not be good for the economy.
Probably the best way forward would be free trade agreements based on selected produce or selected regions/countries.
For example opening the market to Thai or American rice would be a disaster while opening up to foreign fruit exporters would be a big help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cedar
Joined: 11 Mar 2003 Location: In front of my computer, again.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gorgias wrote: |
@Cedar, whoa Cujo, down boy. Educate yourself.
|
Honey, if you think that big farming is the answer you are so off-base.
You are also missing the historical complexity of Korea... what were the agricultural reforms after the USAMGIK finally let Korea loose? Why were those instituted? How easily do you think you can erase Korean history in the interest of a cheaper pear? There used to be some mighty large plots of land owned by single owners you know.
Cheaper pears might be nice for you and me, but on the other hand, the whole world doesn't have to turn into a KMART blue-light special rules sort of reality. What is Japan doing to reform their (20 years back virtually identical to Korea) farming system? They are going for MORE specialization... super duper totally delicious extra-expensive 100% organic rice (and still from the little farmers, in most cases). There is more than one way to deal with the WTO era of Trade Agreements that mandate changes in Korean agriculture.
| Quote: |
| In time, unless the farmers get the upper hand, the "small-time farmers" will be bought out by the "big-time farmers" who will inturn become or be be bought out by the corporations. |
I hope you aren't saying this would be a good thing! C'mon, the farmers in Korea have been holding onto the upper hand (until quite recently) and still in many ways have it. (Did you miss this point, it's only on the news every month for as long as I've lived in Korea). Do you think that 5 dollars pears mean they do NOT have the upper hand? Do we need more Monsanto biologically "improved" corn in the world? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm all for opening the market. I'm sick of paying four bucks a kilo for rice here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The point about romanticism is well taken. There is a lot of it here. I'd say two out of three Koreans I know say they want to live on a farm, but they are not interested in doing that kind of work. The little villages out here where I live are nearly void of young people. My high school is two stories, but there is only one classroom used upstairs. The rest are empty. We only have 118 students in school and it takes about a dozen villages to supply that many kids.
Specialization is part of the answer. So is larger farms which require fewer workers. Korea produces a huge surplus of rice but the price is kept artificially high to subsidize the farmers. There are a lot of possibilities between postage stamp-size farms and farms the size of counties. It is not an either/or choice as some want to present it.
Last point. Each year hundreds, maybe a couple of thousand, foreign-born women are brought in to marry the farmers because most Korean women will no longer consider a farming life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
periwinkle
Joined: 08 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| I'm all for opening the market. I'm sick of paying four bucks a kilo for rice here. |
Free markets feed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| periwinkle wrote: |
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| I'm all for opening the market. I'm sick of paying four bucks a kilo for rice here. |
Free markets feed. |
Yep, at a fraction of the price. Protectionism just means some get a free ride. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hypnotist

Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Location: I wish I were a sock
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| periwinkle wrote: |
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| I'm all for opening the market. I'm sick of paying four bucks a kilo for rice here. |
Free markets feed. |
Yep, at a fraction of the price. Protectionism just means some get a free ride. |
Name me a single country in the world in a position to preach about this, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hypnotist wrote: |
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| periwinkle wrote: |
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| I'm all for opening the market. I'm sick of paying four bucks a kilo for rice here. |
Free markets feed. |
Yep, at a fraction of the price. Protectionism just means some get a free ride. |
Name me a single country in the world in a position to preach about this, though. |
None. I'm citing an ideal here, but tarrifs coming down is a good thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gorgias
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| national broadcasters screen television variety programs that consist of teams of young pop stars selling rice at exorbitant prices to raise money for farmer groups - as if paying three times as much as anywhere else in the world wasn��t enough. The national sentiment is firmly behind the rural sector as it squirms in anticipation of competitive imports. (from here) |
If you are more than thirty years old, and grew up in central North America, you may remember the old Pool and Paterson grain elevators. Click here to see these elevators. About a decade ago, they were quickly replaced by mega-elevators capable of holding about 200 times as much grain. These mega-elevators along with corporate and "big-time" farming have eliminated the need for the very existence of hundreds of towns which once had had the smaller Pool elevators. (In fact, my father's hometown is now literally a ghost town.) Here is a sad article lamenting the disapearence of the Pool elevators. Unfortunately mega-elevators are the way of the future. As someone who has a degree of fondness for the country which has employed me for the last few years, I sincerely hope for their sake, that the nation can find a way to pay hommage to it's past, without supporting an entire anachronistic economic sector.
| Quote: |
the real issue is the exorbitant cost of agricultural protection, which slows the entire economy. Higher prices for agricultural products undermine economic efficiency, effectively penalizing efficient and highly competitive sectors such as manufacturing and information technology.
In simple terms, if the average kimchi-eating South Korean worker pays more for his cabbage and rice, he needs higher wages. Those higher wages are borne by the employer, making it more difficult for the employer to compete internationally. (from same) |
Better to force changes on a dreaming population now, because when grain and produce FTAs force their way into Korea, which they will, and soon, the agricultural sector is going to be holocosted.
I hope any one reading this thread will discuss this issue with their Korean friends and family, because radical change is needed, and fast. Free-trade and protectionism is a slightly different, but very related issue to the need for agricultural modernization.
In a sense, Korea would benefit from returning to the pre-USAMGIK land tenure model. While redistribution of agricultural lands (exactly as is happening in Zimbabwe and Venezuela now, and will happen in South Africa soon) made sense at the time, as a sort of welfare system to suport a deeply impoverish rural population. In 2005, thousands of tiny family farms stand terribly in the way of the inevitable future of agriculture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fidel
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Location: North Shore NZ
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hypnotist wrote: |
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| periwinkle wrote: |
| jaganath69 wrote: |
| I'm all for opening the market. I'm sick of paying four bucks a kilo for rice here. |
Free markets feed. |
Yep, at a fraction of the price. Protectionism just means some get a free ride. |
Name me a single country in the world in a position to preach about this, though. |
NEW ZEALAND
We give NO, I repeat NO subsidies to our farmers and almost NO barriers to entry. We have been this way for more than a decade and our farms are thriving. We CAN preach about this and are probably the only country that can.
As for the op, I don't want to criticise but you are a non-native English speaker aren't you? Because if you're not then you have some major problems! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|