|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
south pacific
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: Business idea |
|
|
Hi all,
Employer relations vs. business sideline
I appreciate that to undertake private teaching outside of school hours, a documentation process is required, which legalizes privates and provides transparency. But I'd be interested in hearing views from those who have investigated going beyond privates, to their own business sideline, and how employers reacted (assuming transparency with the employer).
This needn't be limited to teaching. I'm interested in the tension between employment and the entrepreneurial spirit, e.g., in respect of an idea such as the one below. I appreciate the red-tape aspect, but I assume this can be overcome (a bit like privates, except this is more like foreign direct investment).
For those interested, I hope you won't mind me sharing thoughts on a business concept, inspired by a poster's offer of a small loan to me.
Scenario: Dragon Finance
A Seoul-based ESL professional starts 'Dragon Finance' - a micro-loan facility for ESL teachers in SK.
They advertise on Dave's, and schedule appointments around their teaching schedule, which luckily has sufficient flexibility to accommodate this. Loan application interviews are conducted in the local Starbucks.
Dragon Finance starts small, issuing two 1-month loans of US$500, to two stranded ESL teachers in Seoul. Interest is charged at 10% per month, to cover time, expenses (e.g., advertising, documentation, etc.), and risk.
It turns out that demand is consistent, and after 10 months, and a steady stream of borrowers, the initial US$1,000 outlay has grown to $2,000, due to 10 months worth of interest (@ 2 x US$50 per month).
Dragon is then able to grow its loan book to 4 x $500 loans the following year. That doubles again, and so-on.
On paper, this means it would take Dragon 10 years to turn $1,000 into $1 m.
But if the founder had started by putting $6,000 at risk (i.e., 12 x $500 loans), it would have $6 m after 10 years. By then, the company would have expanded into other geographical ESL markets (as the loan-book would out-grow the SK market).
I only float this idea as an example. I'm interested in comments from those who are balancing employment with a business sideline. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
10% a month????? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
south pacific
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I only used that figure as an example
But when you think about it, it might be a fair rate when you take into account: a) online advertising; b) documentation (e.g., stationery, consented photocopying of applicant employment contracts, manila folders, etc.); c) time taken to process applications, consented phone calls to employers, to confirm employment, etc.; d) the risk factor - e.g., that, say, 1 in 10 borrowers may not make good on their loan; and, e) the face value of the loan amount is not a lot in the scheme of things - $500 @ 10% is still only $50, which should be affordable.
If conducted legally, and ethically, i.e., no hidden costs, then I don't think this is unscrupulous or predatory. It's just market forces for a finance product, not too dissimilar to a bank loan.
An alternative to this level of interest is a lower interest rate combined with a compulsory loan protection insurance premium, but this would still have to be $55 if we assume that for every 10 loans, one borrower will default or do a disappearing act. So you may as well keep it at 10% interest, for the sake of simplicity. Those are my thoughts anyway.
But I'm interested really in any feedback on the employment vs. need to try some sort of business venture tension, and experiences people have had. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you taken into consideration that many ESLers make no bones about skipping out on their last month phone bill, etc?
It's one thing to make a loan to a person who is a member of a stable community. It's something else to loan money to a member of a transient community. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll praise your entrepunerial (sp? -- why doesn't Dave's have a spell check?) spirit.
But, you can be a loan shark back home too. You can even get some muscle and break people's knee caps if they don't pay. You could be the Godfather of Korean loan sharks.
Many first time teachers can get advances on their pay from their hakwons so I am not so sure this is going to work.
But, I have a suggestion for you: Become a certified financial planner and help cash-laden ESLers invest their money and prepare for retirement. Now, this is a side-line with great potential for the right sort. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
south pacific
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Ya-ta boy. Yes, and I think the argument for a 10% monthly rate (maybe even 15%?) finds support in this. In reality, I'm not sure the numbers of ESL teachers in need of a micro-loan would be that great. So, whether the concept is worth trying to operationalize would be up to individual entrepreneur aspirants. I don't think there would be an easy way of doing market research either. Could one send questionnaires out to language departments / schools and expect them to be returned? It's unlikely many would be.
On a different note, and so as not to get bogged down in a finance venture scenario, here is another example.
A lady called Donna Awatere-Huata, formerly a New Zealand psychologist and MP, invented a four minute method to help kids read.
Quote: |
"We've got failed readers of a huge proportion," she said in 1982.
Awatere created the four minute reading programme in the 1970s. Four minutes each night with parents, followed up by another few minutes with teachers at school, taught kids to read by identifying the sounds of the letters in a word.
The programme was simple but ground breaking. Sceptics were quickly silenced.
"I said I'd soon show him that it wouldn't work but when I started it the children just zoomed up with their reading and I was absolutely sold on it," said Beth Whitehead, a senior reading teacher, in 1991.
Fifteen years on and Bruce McLaren school is still reaping its benefits.
"I found it really hard but now its quite easy," says a Bruce McLaren student. |
Quote: |
She told One News she is working with the Pipi Trust Foundation again, finalising a multi-million dollar deal to sell her four minute reading programme to the Chinese English language market.
And there are big dollars to be made.
Gordon Dreyden has just sold 10 million copies in China of his book The Learning Revolution.
In the book he recommends the reading programme.
"We still mention these as among the breakthroughs that took place in New Zealand," Dreyden says.
Samoan student Clevell Chang Tung says the programme has helped him.
"It's helped me like in all aspects, its helped me improve. I've moved up five years in my reading." |
As the article mentioned, Dreyden's book just sold 10 million copies in China. So this is an example of the application on entrepreneurship in our profession, to benefit people everywhere, as much as participate in capitalism. As such, I think it is healthy to discuss such a topic within our fraternity. There will be some practitioners out there with good-, classroom tested, mass-marketable ideas. There's a big ESL market out there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
south pacific
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Unposter. You beat me to the observation that this is a niche market that may be limited. Also, I didn't include my source: http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411416/927754
On the topic of financial planning, I may have a worthwhile suggestion.
For $1,000 set up an account with CMC markets http://cmcmarkets.com (reputable)
Using only $100 of the thou, you could buy 5 x $20 S&P 500 index contracts, and "go long" - in other words, stay in the market. Over a period of time, as illustrated by the chart (see URL below), the market goes up. So it's like a big gravy train, and all you have to do is get on it. In a year, if the market goes up 200 points, you would make 200 x 2 (allowing for two increments per point) x .30 cents each increment (per $20 contract) = $400 x .30 = $120 x 5 contracts = $600. Not a bad return on $100. If you had invested 1000, in contrast to 100, you would make 6,000. If you had invested 10,000, the yield is US$60,000, which would mean finanical independence for most people.
http://quote.barchart.com/chart.asp?sym=$INX&code=$INX
Sorry to get into heavy stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Or go short?
Now THAT's living .... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
south pacific
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wangja, check out the Hong Kong 33 index. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wangja wrote: |
10% a month????? |
Actually for no securities attached to the loan, this is a fair reward to the shark
Now he just needs to find some henchman to break the guys fingers.
all jokes beside, 10% per month mounts up to +120% per year if they all pay up.
With a default of 50 percent the return is slightly lower . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I love the way people ALWAYS asume the market to go up.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Juregen wrote: |
I love the way people ALWAYS asume the market to go up.... |
I agree, but actually I suggested the opposite.
Tulips anyone? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:49 am Post subject: Re: Business idea |
|
|
south pacific wrote: |
Hi all,
[Scenario: Dragon Finance
A Seoul-based ESL professional starts 'Dragon Finance' - a micro-loan facility for ESL teachers in SK.
They advertise on Dave's, and schedule appointments around their teaching schedule, which luckily has sufficient flexibility to accommodate this. Loan application interviews are conducted in the local Starbucks.
Dragon Finance starts small, issuing two 1-month loans of US$500, to two stranded ESL teachers in Seoul. Interest is charged at 10% per month, to cover time, expenses (e.g., advertising, documentation, etc.), and risk.
. |
Permit me to offer an alternate scenario. Both ESL teachers take the money and run. Dragon Finance loses $1000.
And it would cost you more to start a court action to recover the money. Lose-lose scenario. And what's to stop somebody from using a friend's ID? If it came to court the friend could easily show that his handwriting doesn't come close to matching the one on the contract.
Not to mention that you would have to get a license and go through all the red tape for your business in order to take someone to court. No court is going to prosecute someone for taking a loan out of an ILLEGAL business.
That too would cost you a pretty penny. Not to mention that you would need a different visa than an E-2 in order to set this up. So while you are setting this up, how would you pay the overhead, taxes, expenses....?
And 10% a month? Even if it was 1% a month most people would just prefer to get INTEREST-FREE advances from their boss. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Novernae
Joined: 02 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't you have to have about 12,000 'customers' that last month to maintain that growth at that size?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
While on an E2 I set up a business here in korea - it was approved by the tax office and gu but eventually (read: strongly) rejected by Immigration as a violation of my E2.
I have since set up my own company while on an F2 visa.
No Immigration hassles so far. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|