| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mack the knife

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: standing right behind you...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bibbitybop

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| While that is good info, you need to show the literacy rate before and after Hangul was introduced. The common claim is not that Hangul makes Koreans more literate than the rest of the world, but that is made Koreans more literate than when Chinese was used in Korea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It says that North Korea is 8th equal worldwide for literacy, South Korea is 16th equal with Spain. I wouldn't really call that 'for crap'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JeJuJitsu

Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Location: McDonald's
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bibbitybop wrote: |
| While that is good info, you need to show the literacy rate before and after Hangul was introduced. The common claim is not that Hangul makes Koreans more literate than the rest of the world, but that is made Koreans more literate than when Chinese was used in Korea. |
I'm of the suspicion that the vast majority of Koreans over 50 can't read hangul, judging by the number of times the buses I ride stop for these older folks, only for them to ask the bus driver confusedly if the bus is going to X destination--even though the important stops are clearly marked on the buses, and the bus stop itself has a detail list & map of every stop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JeJuJitsu wrote: |
I'm of the suspicion that the vast majority of Koreans over 50 can't read hangul, judging by the number of times the buses I ride stop for these older folks, only for them to ask the bus driver confusedly if the bus is going to X destination--even though the important stops are clearly marked on the buses, and the bus stop itself has a detail list & map of every stop. |
That's probably because when they went to school, they were taught Japanese. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JeJuJitsu wrote: |
| Bibbitybop wrote: |
| While that is good info, you need to show the literacy rate before and after Hangul was introduced. The common claim is not that Hangul makes Koreans more literate than the rest of the world, but that is made Koreans more literate than when Chinese was used in Korea. |
I'm of the suspicion that the vast majority of Koreans over 50 can't read hangul, judging by the number of times the buses I ride stop for these older folks, only for them to ask the bus driver confusedly if the bus is going to X destination--even though the important stops are clearly marked on the buses, and the bus stop itself has a detail list & map of every stop. |
At my school there is a special class for older people (usually over 50) where they are taught hangul. There are quite a few in it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Location: the crib
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| North Korea has a higher literacy rate? That's really hard to believe. I don't know how trustworthy those numbers are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qinella wrote: |
| North Korea has a higher literacy rate? That's really hard to believe. I don't know how trustworthy those numbers are. |
Probably not that suspicious - I'd bet reading is necessary to the early childhood indoctrination programmes. Notice all the (ex)communist countries have comparatively high rates of literacy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mack, you are just willfully turning a blind eye to the rather obvious difficulties in judging literacy across hundreds of different languages.
You found a stat you liked and instead of presenting it for what it is, and you make some high-handed proclamation like "Myth: Busted".
To me, and I would think anybody who gave it a moment's thought, the technical problems associated with creating a universal standard of literacy are great enough that a few percentage points of difference on that chart are not enough indicate a definite real-world difference.
If you disagree, then come up with a standard test of literacy that would be equally effective for any language and any culture. And then hope it was used when those stats were created. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DEFINITION: This entry includes a definition of literacy and Census Bureau percentages for the total population, males, and females. There are no universal definitions and standards of literacy. Unless otherwise specified, all rates are based on the most common definition - the ability to read and write at a specified age. Detailing the standards that individual countries use to assess the ability to read and write is beyond the scope of our source. Information on literacy, while not a perfect measure of educational results, is probably the most easily available and valid for international comparisons." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vancouver
Joined: 12 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 97.9 is pretty darn good |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peony

Joined: 30 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i find it hard to believe that 99% of americans are literate, where does west virginia and tennessee factor in?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peony

Joined: 30 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JeJuJitsu wrote: |
| Bibbitybop wrote: |
| While that is good info, you need to show the literacy rate before and after Hangul was introduced. The common claim is not that Hangul makes Koreans more literate than the rest of the world, but that is made Koreans more literate than when Chinese was used in Korea. |
I'm of the suspicion that the vast majority of Koreans over 50 can't read hangul, judging by the number of times the buses I ride stop for these older folks, only for them to ask the bus driver confusedly if the bus is going to X destination--even though the important stops are clearly marked on the buses, and the bus stop itself has a detail list & map of every stop. |
and you dont think its because they're old, their eyesight is going or that they are confused with how to use public transport?
my dad is getting on in his years and stuff he used to do effortlessly in the past, he needs my help for now
personally, i dont think i've met 1 illiterate korean person so far, have any of you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peony:
If that's what it says about the American literacy rate, you're right.
The number of recent Mexican immigrants, many illegal, who don't read or write in English alone would drop that number considerably. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JeJuJitsu

Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Location: McDonald's
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| billybrobby wrote: |
Mack, you are just willfully turning a blind eye to the rather obvious difficulties in judging literacy across hundreds of different languages.
You found a stat you liked and instead of presenting it for what it is, and you make some high-handed proclamation like "Myth: Busted".
To me, and I would think anybody who gave it a moment's thought, the technical problems associated with creating a universal standard of literacy are great enough that a few percentage points of difference on that chart are not enough indicate a definite real-world difference.
If you disagree, then come up with a standard test of literacy that would be equally effective for any language and any culture. And then hope it was used when those stats were created. |
Of course the list is silly--I taught in American Public Schools before Korea, and would say the literacy rate for inner city students was around 40%(of the ones that attended, never mind the one's who dropped out to deal crack)--not sure how USA is listed at 99%. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|