| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
deessell
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:44 pm Post subject: BBC News reports Building 7 collapse 23 minutes before it... |
 |
|
Must see video. Watch it quick as it is vanishing off the internet.
BBC News reports Building 7 collapse 23 minutes before it happens.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee
Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| First Chomsky, now the BBC. Who isn't in on this conspiracy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rteacher
Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm - the number "23" ties in with Jim Carrey's new movie ...
Could it be that the BBC orchestrated the whole thing to boost ratings (with tacit approval of the Queen to avenge the loss of Britain's most prized colony in the New World? (Uh, well no, probably not ...)
How about this: The Zionist-controlled media got their signals crossed a little in their ruthless execution of a "Wag the Dog"-style production on a massive scale to further their goals (... - it's possible, I guess  )
Most likely official explanation: the original broadcast footage was tampered with by hoax-ers to suggest an "insider" conspiracy of some sort (which may well be the case...) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ddeubel
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I will say this,
I am not one who has followed all the zigs and zags of this event, in the whodunit sense. I really have no ability to discern fact from fiction.
But as such a layman, this does raise my eyebrows and does so in a dramatic fashion. Perhaps it is just this drama which raises both my interest and scepticism?????
But fascinating.
DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:21 am Post subject: Re: BBC News reports Building 7 collapse 23 minutes before i |
|
|
| deessell wrote: |
Must see video. Watch it quick as it is vanishing off the internet.
BBC News reports Building 7 collapse 23 minutes before it happens.
|
 It's like watching the blind men and the elephant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
English_Ocean
Joined: 17 Mar 2006
Location: You don't have the right to abuse me!
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
The whole event reeks of conspiracy.
It's fascinating. I wonder how long it took to plan.
My wish is for Scotland Yard to investigate or some other uninvolved authority.
Why hasn't Saudi Arabia or Iran begun an investigation?
Also, I've never an American airplane painted flat black before.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| English_Ocean wrote: |
Also, I've never an American airplane painted flat black before. |
eh?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The conspiracy nuts on their hacked video say to ask questions. OK.
Wasn't the US on daylight savings time on September 11, 2001 like they are in every other year? If so, the time of the report is accurate according to BBC broadcast time, that is, 37 minutes after the collapse and not 23 minutes before, etc.
Doesn't the 47 story building seem to be much too tall in the background? If so, the people who hacked in and planted the phony background did a poor job.
Isn' t asking questions fun? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ninjorp
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ninjorp wrote: |
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/280207timestamp.htm
Looks like it was 26 minutes early. |
Theory 1: The people on the scene, having just witnessed two other buildings collapse, and realizing the extensive damage to WTC 7, figured it too was probably going to collapse soon.
Theory 2: Upon seeing planes crash into the WTCs 1 & 2, Larry Silverman quickly rounded up a 20-30 man demolition crew and supplies, computed the necessary charges and placement, and then covertly planted enough explosives to bring the building down. He then convinced the firefighters and police (not to mention demolition crew) to all go along with his plan, confident that he had Bush and Congress in his back pocket, and that they would not investigate the "collapse." Unfortunately, BBC, which was also in on the whole plan, let it slip early that the building had collapsed, unaware of the exact timing.
Hmmmm. It's a toss up. We need a fuller investigation before I can make up my mind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Hammer
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Ullungdo 37.5 N, 130.9 E, altitude : 223 m
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| huffdaddy wrote: |
| Ninjorp wrote: |
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/280207timestamp.htm
Looks like it was 26 minutes early. |
Theory 1: The people on the scene, having just witnessed two other buildings collapse, and realizing the extensive damage to WTC 7, figured it too was probably going to collapse soon.
Theory 2: Upon seeing planes crash into the WTCs 1 & 2, Larry Silverman quickly rounded up a 20-30 man demolition crew and supplies, computed the necessary charges and placement, and then covertly planted enough explosives to bring the building down. He then convinced the firefighters and police (not to mention demolition crew) to all go along with his plan, confident that he had Bush and Congress in his back pocket, and that they would not investigate the "collapse." Unfortunately, BBC, which was also in on the whole plan, let it slip early that the building had collapsed, unaware of the exact timing.
Hmmmm. It's a toss up. We need a fuller investigation before I can make up my mind. |
Rain Man says...
"Theory 2 is out. Theory 1 is in. Theory 2 is out. Theory 1 is in."
There you have it folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gang ah jee
Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jeffkim1972
Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Location: Mokpo
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The other logical explanation is that they simply didn't know what BLDG 7 looked like. A couple of buildings collapsed along with the twin towers so if you never knew what BLDG7 looked like, nor what the other building names were and you could get confused about these many buildings during this time.
It was probably just a mistaken identity thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jeffkim1972 wrote: |
The other logical explanation is that they simply didn't know what BLDG 7 looked like. A couple of buildings collapsed along with the twin towers so if you never knew what BLDG7 looked like, nor what the other building names were and you could get confused about these many buildings during this time.
It was probably just a mistaken identity thing. |
What have you done to prove my Theory 2 isn't correct? Obviously, the conspirators in charge would want to keep the BBC in on their plan. How else have they prevented the media from uncovering their crimes.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
from gaj's link
| Quote: |
| We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of co-cck-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another. |
Now while, I'm not to think that it would be a conspiracy, losing the broadcast tapes of probably the biggest news event in a loooong while, is beyond merely a "co-cck up". Dare I say it's stupidity exemplified. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
