Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

HOW MANY ENGLISH WORDS SHOULD KOREAN HS GRADS KNOW?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:26 am    Post subject: HOW MANY ENGLISH WORDS SHOULD KOREAN HS GRADS KNOW? Reply with quote

I've perused the MOE and KEDI sites but could not locate any document in English that specifically provides the benchmarks for vocabulary learning at different educational levels.

What I urgently need to know is the minimum number of target words (not collocations) Korean high school graduates are expected to have.

I have heard figures as high as 6,000 to 7,000 words but I find that incredible as it would be double what is expected of even the best academically prepared high school students in some other Asian nations.

Any guidance will be much appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darkness



Joined: 12 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

3,674
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomato



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know if this helps but I'll try:

I have a copy of the Korean word frequency chart published by Yonsei University.
The first 3000 words comprise 85% of written Korean.
I would like to claim 90%, but that would involve learning the first 6000 words.
So I settled for 3000, and I still have a long way to go.
And I have been studying that list for 6 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blynch



Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Location: UCLA

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

about 5000 (according to my coworkers)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Woland



Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For English, the first 2,000 most frequest word families account for about 79% of a typical text. Averill Coxhead's Academic Word List, which covers another 650 word families (approximately) that occur frequently in academic texts but not in other genres, would add another 8% in coverage for about 87% coverage total for academic texts.

Paul Nation has suggested that this is the limit of what should be taught directly. Beyond this level, individual words are so infrequent that teaching them may not be the most productive use of our classroom time. This is not to say that students should not be exposed to them, only that direct instructional time should not be spent on them; students will need exposure and potential incidental learning in order to become proficient readers.

See, here's the catch. In order to read independently, learners need to know 95% to 98% of the words in the text (these estimates come from both Nation and Batia Laufer; I believe the variation may relate to familiarity with genre). At about 90% knowledge, students can read with assistance. Below this is what is called 'frustration level' - students are reading too slowly, looking up too many words, to effectively deal with the content of the reading.

You can see the problem here. What is teachable is not enough to get beyond frustration. To get students to the level of being independent, high level readers is going to require lots of exposure to texts that are adjusted to the level of the students, with help provided in getting content. (Friends of mine recently published a study in Foreign Language Annals showing how limited incidental vocabulary acquisition from a single text is; look up the Ferrell Tekmen & Daloglu article last year for details). With considerable exposure like this, plus encouragement of extensive reading, students can become independent readers.

So, how many words should Korean high school students know? I don't know (so I can't answer your question about what is expected; whatever it is, I imagine it's too much). It should depend on the overall hours of English instruction in the curriculum. Given what I do know (which is limited), here's what I would suggest. First, let us assume a systematic curriculum structure and one that is lexically-based (as opposed to structurally-based)*. I would propose that the first 2,000 words be taught by the end of high school, with exposure, expecially in the later years to high school to a wider ranger of vocabulary. This would leave the required English classes at university to focus on the Academic Word List.

An approach like this, which is rational, has some features that would likely be opposed in Korea. First, it would suggest that learners should not be taking the TOEFL or TOEIC until high school or, better, later, and not expecting high sccores until in university or later. I would hope the public could educated about appropriate expectiations*, but I also understand the limits of reason. Second, it would suggest that materials that are manageable for students be developed in line with this teaching plan, rather than assuming that we can just stuff more and more things above the students heads (read: "authentic" texts) down their throats*.

I've written this off the top of my head, based on a lecture that I give in my SLA class. The exact figures may be off a bit, but the general idea is correct. gang ah jee actually knows more about this than anyone here. I'll try to get him to contribute to this thread.

For those interested in knowing more about the word lists and how to teach with them, please go to either of these places:

http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation/nation.aspx (Paul Nation's webpage)

or http://132.208.224.131/ (Tom Cobb's invaluable Compleat Lexical Tutor)

Batia Laufer's webpage is also worth a look for bibliographic purposes: http://english.haifa.ac.il/batia.htm

For people who are interested in teaching collocations, they should see Shin DongKwan's recently completed dissertation (done under Paul Nation's supervision), which looks at what the most valuable collocations in English are. If you want it, pm me and we can work out a way to get it to you.

* Yeah, wishful thinking, I know.

EDIT: Fixed typos, clarified, cut a speculative paragraph, added some stuff.


Last edited by Woland on Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:18 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomato



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Woland wrote:
For English, the first 2,000 most frequest word families account for about 79% of a typical text.


I looked up the 2000th word on the Yonsei list, and it said that the words up to and including this word account for 81.7%.

That's pretty close.
I wonder if the word frequency curves for all languages correlate.

Oh, in case you are wondering, the 200th word is the word ending -리라는.
The dictionary doesn't give a definition, but it gives an example:

네가 그녀와 결혼하리라는 소식을 그에게서 들었다 =
He told me that you would marry her.

I have a long way to go before I reach 81.7%.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chamchiman



Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Location: Digging the Grave

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomato wrote:
I don't know if this helps but I'll try:

I have a copy of the Korean word frequency chart published by Yonsei University.
The first 3000 words comprise 85% of written Korean.
I would like to claim 90%, but that would involve learning the first 6000 words.
So I settled for 3000, and I still have a long way to go.
And I have been studying that list for 6 years.


Interesting. Do you have a link to this list?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomato



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There seems to be disagreement over how many words the average preschooler knows.

According to a Google search which I just ran, the average 3-year-old knows 200-300, 500, 900, or 2000-4000 words.

The average 4-year-old knows
1200, 1500, or 4000-6000 words.

According to Krashen (1997: 22), comic books in English employ a vocabulary of approximately 2000 words ).

If Krashen is right and the Parma City School Website is right, then comic books are below the level of the average 4-year-old!



Krashen, S. D. 1997. Foreign language education the easy way. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tomato



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello, Chamchiman!

A few other people have asked me before, so I scanned the first four pages of the list:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v500/pentatonika/yonsei1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v500/pentatonika/yonsei2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v500/pentatonika/yonsei3.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v500/pentatonika/yonsei4.jpg

You can get a bigger chunk of this list--about 2000 words--by going to http://groups.yahoo.com, joining the group named EnglishKoreanExchange, clicking on the word "Files," and clicking on the first item on the list.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PimpofKorea



Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Location: Dealing in high quality imported English

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

just 4

KISS MY WHITE NUTZ.

When I say that to them on the street....they should comprehend it thoroughly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Woland



Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomato wrote:
There seems to be disagreement over how many words the average preschooler knows.

According to a Google search which I just ran, the average 3-year-old knows 200-300, 500, 900, or 2000-4000 words.

The average 4-year-old knows
1200, 1500, or 4000-6000 words.

According to Krashen (1997: 22), comic books in English employ a vocabulary of approximately 2000 words ).

If Krashen is right and the Parma City School Website is right, then comic books are below the level of the average 4-year-old!



Krashen, S. D. 1997. Foreign language education the easy way. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.


Let's not mix up words and word families. The vocabulary of the average 3-4 year old learning their first language in an L1 environment is not 2000 word families.

And for teaching purposes here in Korea, let's not mix up L1 learning with L2 learning. Many Korean parents have the idea that by starting their children in English classes earlier, like kindy hagwon, they will make learning English like learning Korean and their children will become bilingual. But in Korea, English is a foreign language, not a second language, and is minimally supported in the environment. Children's development in English will not match the development in their first language.

In fact, there is no evidence that starting earlier will necessarily produce a better learning outcome than starting later, given the same number of hours of instruction (for example, 100 hours/year for 15 years, ages 4-18 vs. 500 hours/year for three years, ages 16-18 ). The delusion that starting early will necessarily turn Korean children into fully bilingual speakers of Korean and English should be resisted. Getting this point across could lead to a discussion of what meaningful goals for language instruction at all ages and levels should be.

I agree with Krashen that comic books can be valuable teaching tools, but I completely disagree with his theoretical stance on L2 acquisition. Krashen's theoretical model of L2 acquisition is based on the assumption, now largely rejected by the scholarly community, that L2 acquisition involves the same mechanisms as L1 acquisition.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ipsofacto



Joined: 26 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PimpofKorea wrote:
just 4

KISS MY WHITE NUTZ.

When I say that to them on the street....they should comprehend it thoroughly.


I just laughed out loud when I read that !!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yingwenlaoshi



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: ... location, location!

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ipsofacto wrote:
PimpofKorea wrote:
just 4

KISS MY WHITE NUTZ.

When I say that to them on the street....they should comprehend it thoroughly.


I just laughed out loud when I read that !!


Me too.

Alll I do all day in class is count how many English words each student knows. Good time filler. Cha ching!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Dude from Canada



Joined: 19 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

who cares. most of them will end up as taxi drivers or cleaning ajummas anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomato



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Woland, are you sure you didn't read into implications which were not in my last post?

Quote:
Let's not mix up words and word families.


How was I confusing words with word families?

Quote:
And for teaching purposes here in Korea, let's not mix up L1 learning with L2 learning.


How was I confusing L1 learning with L2 learning?

Quote:
But in Korea, English is a foreign language, not a second language, and is minimally supported in the environment. Children's development in English will not match the development in their first language.


You think I don't know that?
I've been teaching English in Korea for 7 years.
I've been listening to Korean English teachers in neighboring classrooms chattering constantly in Korean for 7 years.
I've been hearing sixth graders saying "Teacher, pencil no" for 7 years.

Quote:
I agree with Krashen that comic books can be valuable teaching tools, but I completely disagree with his theoretical stance on L2 acquisition. Krashen's theoretical model of L2 acquisition is based on the assumption, now largely rejected by the scholarly community, that L2 acquisition involves the same mechanisms as L1 acquisition.


Just because I quoted Krashen means I agree with everything he said?
I didn't say that " L2 acquisition involves the same mechanisms as L1 acquisition." I didn't even say that "comic books can be valuable teaching tools." All I said was that comic books have a vocabulary of 2000 words, assuming that Krashen's statement is correct. All I was implying was that an ESL student who knows 2000 would be able to read an English comic book.

And what's all this talk about whether or not there is an advantage to an early start? I didn't say that either. All I was trying to do was find how many words azn ESL student would have to know in order to communicate as well as a L1 preschooler.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International