Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

what do the yanks on dave's think about this DOJ scandal???
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
freethought



Joined: 13 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:19 pm    Post subject: what do the yanks on dave's think about this DOJ scandal??? Reply with quote

I'm just curious what all the Americans on this board think and feel about the DOJ scandal. I'm watching the news, reading the papers and websites and if I was an American I would be outraged. I would be even more outrage at Bush's declaration that he will fight the swearing in of officials. To me, that is unacceptable.

If my prime minister and his party and staff were embroiled in a scandal and then refused to allow a proper investigation of it, I'm not sure what would happen in Canada, but the outrage, I think, would be FAR more than what I've been seeing in the American media.

Now, before anyone says this is my political bias, I just want to say that I resigned from my job with the liberals when I did because of what I saw in a scandal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If my prime minister and his party and staff were embroiled in a scandal and then refused to allow a proper investigation of it, I'm not sure what would happen in Canada, but the outrage, I think, would be FAR more than what I've been seeing in the American media.


How do you define the standard for proper outrage? Most American media I've seen have been covering the issue on a regular basis, giving fairly detailed descriptions of the allegations against Gonzales et al, as well as the Republican reaction. What precisely do you think they should be doing differently?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freethought



Joined: 13 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not asking about the coverage. I'm asking what people actually think. As in, are the americans on this board outraged? I haven't seen any poll numbers on Bush, whether Gonzales should get the ax, or any poll on public opinion on the scandal.

I know what the politicians are saying and doing, I know what the media is saying and doing, and what I want to know is what the 'people' are thinking and saying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After seven years of far worse shenanigans by Bush, it is honestly difficult to get worked up about this, although in normal times it should inspire outrage and condemnation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freethought



Joined: 13 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not entirely related, but here are the 'important' votes from today's senate repealing of the provisions in the patriot act, which was 94-2:

NAYs ---2
Smith (R-OR)
Specter (R-PA)

Not Voting - 4
Biden (D-DE)
Brownback (R-KS)
Johnson (D-SD)
McCain (R-AZ)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I know what the politicians are saying and doing, I know what the media is saying and doing, and what I want to know is what the 'people' are thinking and saying.


Well, here's a hint: The identifiably anti-Bush American posters are probably outraged. The identifiably pro-Bush American posters probably aren't. Granted, there is probably a "moderate middle" consisting of people whose opinions on Gonzales can't be determined by examining their views on other issues. However, that group is quite small, and I doubt that quizzing them about their views is going to give you much insight into what most Americans living in the USA think about the issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that this might be the final straw for Bush. Seems like there's a scandal every week, and this one might be big enough to bring down the ship. We'll just have to wait and see if the House/Senate has the balls to go through with it.

If Bush goes through with his whole "blockade," it will look like he is guilty as sin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
.."moderate middle"...


WHAT?!?!?

You're actually inferring that not everyone is a "toe-the-line" conservative or liberal? That's absurd! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pligganease wrote:
On the other hand wrote:
.."moderate middle"...


WHAT?!?!?

You're actually inferring that not everyone is a "toe-the-line" conservative or liberal? That's absurd! Wink


No disrepsect intended for the middle. I'd probably class myself in that category most days, albeit on the left of the middle. Just that we're not really talking about a large enough number of people to be considered representative of US public opinion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jmbran11



Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Location: U.S.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With the exception of die-hard Bush supporters, I think most Americans now just except that it's par for the course with this administration. I admit that I was an adamant opponent of Bush all along, but the rest of the country wasn't - initially. I just returned from 3 weeks in the States. Now, people who originally supported sending our troops to war, will talk about how the president is a liar and there is no integrity in government.

Every day we are bombarded with images of death in Iraq, of our worsening relations with the rest of the world, of Bush's rich friends profitting from war-mongering, of presendential aides accused or convicted of breaking the law, etc. The truth is, the average person who may have been inclined to trust the president 8 years ago, now has no faith in the government to protect the people, save the world, or even tell the truth (about anything). I think a lot of people have basically just written off this presidency, since it will be over soon, and it would take something really atrocious to garner our outrage at this point (beyond the obliteration of international law, the suspension of civil liberties, and the destruction of the perception of American moral-superiority).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From my observation, there has been a lot of abuse of power during this administration and people on both the Right and Left have been saying the same thing. Frankly, people in the executive branch need to answer to the people and should get subpoenas. If Bush tries to block that, then frankly abuse of power violates the spirit of the constitution. The problem is there is a war in Iraq. It protects Bush from really answering for his failures. We have no evidence that Bush order this or that, or that he is guilty of ordering some kind of cover up or anything of that nature.
However, if he tries to stop people from answering subpoenas, then he is not trying to answer to the people and the elected officials of the United States. He will put himself in a confrontational stance with the the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. As time goes by, he is less and less popular.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EFLtrainer



Joined: 04 May 2005

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The biased, the neo-con sort, like to say the president can do whatever he wants. They are incorrect. He can nominate whomever he wants. He can fire whomever he wants. But he cannot obstruct justice.

The reason Clinton and Bush 41 didn't catch any flack for their appointments was precisely because they were wholesale. They didn't cherry pick based on who was prosecuting Republicans or not prosecuting Democrats. In other words, while inherently a political appointment, the prosecutors were traditionally expected to follow the rule of law and did not have to worry about who they prosecuted.

The other bias (but how can fighting insanity be a bias? Razz ) shows up in.... nothing. Bush had people replaced for purely punitive reasons having to do with who they prosecuted, not how well. That is obstruction of justice. It is illegal, even for the president. In fact, not included in the current scandal, even though it is even more obvious, is the firing of the DA in Guam 2 years ago when he was launching an investigation into.... can you guess? Abramoff.

I am sick of these people and their effects on the US and the world.


Last edited by EFLtrainer on Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:06 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gang ah jee



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dogbert wrote:
After seven years of far worse shenanigans by Bush, it is honestly difficult to get worked up about this, although in normal times it should inspire outrage and condemnation.

My (no doubt incorrect) impression is that the US political landscape has become so twisted and polarised now, it could come out that Bush personally pushed the plunger on the Twin Towers and people would either just shake their heads as if they knew it all along or denounce critics of the 9/11 Policy as liberal whiners.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
hogwonguy1979



Joined: 22 Dec 2003
Location: the racoon den

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 5:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I keep saying this is Watergate revisited. Cheney wants a return of the imperial presidency of Richard Nixon and he is doing everything to try and bring back that kind of executive power.

Lets hope the result of the DOJ stuff is the same as the Saturday Night Massacre. A rebuff of the grab for more executive power and a return to checks and balances thats been sorely missing over the past 6 years
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it is outrageous but par for the course by now. It is not something that anybody who has been paying attention the last few years should be shocked by.

Certainly I doubt the Democrats have the stones to do much about it except piss, moan, and ultimately shrink away or do something insignificant, which is what they are best at.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International