View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:21 am Post subject: Age Discrimination Banned in Recruitment |
|
|
Age Discrimination Banned in Recruitment
Quote: |
Employers will be banned from acts of age discrimination when recruiting workers, the Ministry of Labor said yesterday.
The ministry will submit a bill to the National Assembly to ban age discrimination in the workplace.
The bill would ban management from rejecting new employees for reasons of age from next July at the earliest. From 2010, age discrimination in any form related to employment _ salary, welfare, retirement, layoff, promotion, education and training _ will be prohibited.
Also, indirect discrimination, which can cause unfavorable disadvantages for certain age groups, will not be allowed. Indirect discrimination arises when a provision, criterion or practice, puts persons of a particular age group at a disadvantage.
Similar practices are common worldwide _ The European Union�s Guidelines on Employment Equality, British Employment Equality Age Regulations and Australia�s Age Discrimination Act all prohibit ``indirect discrimination�� in the workplace.
The Labor Relations Board Commission will conduct research and supervision on discriminatory acts committed in companies. When a dispute over age discrimination occurs, an employer is responsible for proving its innocence.
When an employer commits age discrimination in their hiring practices they will be fined up to 5 million won. Also, if they fail to correct the malpractice, they will be subject to a fine of up to 100 million won.
However, exceptions are permitted in cases of certain professions, such as firefighters, which are only open to a certain age group.
According to a government survey of 500 workers and 200 recruitment officers, 80-90 percent said that they welcome the plan.
``The bill is aimed at scrapping discriminatory practices against seniors, regardless of one�s ability and utilizing talented manpower as Korea enters a low-birth rate era,�� said Song Moon-hyun, a ministry official.
[email protected]
03-29-2007 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zolt

Joined: 18 May 2006
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice, just one question: does law also apply to room salon workers? could be funny. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
richardlang
Joined: 21 Jan 2007 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
In response to your signature, after school each day there's a truck loaded with strawberries and rigged with a loudspeaker blaring a recording about his low prices. It's so funny. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's about time.
This year is the 30th anniversary of the passing of the Canadian Human Rights Act (1977) which explicitly prohibits discrimination based on age, among several other stated factors. Exactly a quarter century ago this year the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) also rallied against discrimination based on age.
The new Korean law supports my general impression that this country is about 25-30 years behind my home country, in a lot of things (in terms of social progress/change). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yaya

Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let's see just how effective the new law is. Truth is, the U.S. also has anti-age discrimination laws but they can be hard to enforce as employers can find ways to circumvent them.
It's also hard to prove age discrimination because the employers can simply say "We found someone better." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Saxiif

Joined: 15 May 2003 Location: Seongnam
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am sure that this will have a massive impact on hiring practices.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roch
Joined: 24 Apr 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
VanIslander wrote: |
It's about time.
This year is the 30th anniversary of the passing of the Canadian Human Rights Act (1977) which explicitly prohibits discrimination based on age, among several other stated factors. Exactly a quarter century ago this year the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) also rallied against discrimination based on age.
The new Korean law supports my general impression that this country is about 25-30 years behind my home country, in a lot of things (in terms of social progress/change). |
...and four or five hundred years behind Canada in more than a few other ways. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
andy202

Joined: 28 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
But gender discrimination carries on being OK?
And what about the hiring-people-because-they're "very beautiful" type discrimination?
Discrimination is in the blood of Koreans and I think it would take a cultural revolution before we see the kind of mindset present in the western work environment.
Koreans, bless their hearts, will stop their arbitrary discrimination the same day they stop gobbing on the sidewalk and start queuing for things.
ie, never |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Roch wrote: |
VanIslander wrote: |
It's about time.
This year is the 30th anniversary of the passing of the Canadian Human Rights Act (1977) which explicitly prohibits discrimination based on age, among several other stated factors. Exactly a quarter century ago this year the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) also rallied against discrimination based on age.
The new Korean law supports my general impression that this country is about 25-30 years behind my home country, in a lot of things (in terms of social progress/change). |
...and four or five hundred years behind Canada in more than a few other ways. |
You know, in America, we had a national age discrimination law back in 1967... (puts feet up on desk and clasps hands behind head) ...yep, we're pretty awesome. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm skeptical this will have any effect on foreign teachers. First of all, who is going to believe us over a Korean. Second, the burden would probably fall on us to prove there was discrimination. Third, as someone pointed out the laws are difficult to enforce. In the US in most instances (except where it relates specifically to the job) a perspective employer can't ask your age. Recruiters and schools DO ask these kinds of questions in Korean and my guess is that they will continue to do so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jazblanc77

Joined: 22 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are ways to reword a job description so that it is still still discriminates against certain applicants based on ageism, sexism, racism, etc.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Until the Korean law enforcement community is able to uphold any of these "progressive" pieces of legislation, the simple passing of a bill is still a very small bit of news for me.
This will be just like any other new law; they'll pass it and then noone will enforce it. Just like men with mixed blood now being able to serve in the military. Sure they CAN legally serve, but none are actually doing so due to the precedence that they cannot be accomodated. That legislation was more political than truthful and so will this legislation for curbing discrimination in the workplace. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yaya

Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Like I said, age discrimination laws are hard to enforce. Yes, want ads cannot mention age limits but it's pretty easy for someone to get a sense of your age based on other factors.
It's NOT just Korea that has this problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|