View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: Reducing your carbon footprint |
|
|
This thread is a way to start making, or continue things you're already doing and share them, changes to reduce your carbon footprint - a.k.a help reduce global warming. Add your own. Number them, please!
1. If you've heard of SETI at Home, you'll know what this is. If not, the program uses your computer to help crunch numbers for climate modeling. We could set up an EFL teacher's team... take a gander.
Use your computer to save the world.
2. A guide from Time magazine on ways to reduce your carbon footprint.
51 Ways to Reduce
3. Solar ovens. Make yourself a solar oven. I made one back when I was still in California. It cooked the best-tasting food... Incredible. I cooked meats, vegetables, even bread....
Solar Cooking Info --> Make your own oven
Wood Box solar cooker
http://www.cookwiththesun.com/wood-box.html
http://www.cookwiththesun.com/
Here's how I made mine:
Materials:
Two cardboard boxes. One should be 1.5 to 2 inches smaller than the other on all dimensions, i.e., fit inside the larger.
Weather stripping: strips or gel. Be careful about toxins.
A pane of glass, preferably tempered, a little larger than the smaller box.
Insulation. Anything that won't combust at up to 350 degrees F. I used old winter underwear.
Tin foil.
Glue.
Black paint. Non-toxic.
Pots or jars for cooking. Canning jars or other strong jars work great.
1. Cut the top flaps off the two boxes.
2. Using a spacer of some sort on the bottom of the larger, place insulating material in the bottom.
3. Place the second box inside so the top edges are level with each other.
4. Fill the sides with insulating material.
5. Using the flaps from the smaller box, cover the gap between the two boxes.
6. Either A. paint the interior of the small box black or B. coat it with tin foil, reflective side out, of course. (Use research to choose. I went with black.)
7. Place the weather stripping along the outer top edge of the inner box. If using gel, coat the glass part of the glass - cut to size - that will rest on the stripping with oil or some such and place it down on the gel to create a custom mold for the glass to fit into. Use a bead that will extend beyond the glass to leave an edge for a snugger fit and to prevent slippage of the glass. Let it dry.
8. Using the box tops, cover them with tin foil. You can either arrange them into one parabola or mount them separately. I made one foldable parabola. You can choose to mount this on the box or have it be removable. You're looking for about a 45 degree angle from the plane of the top of the oven. Adjustable parabolas are good.
9. when cooking, you'll need to be able to point the box at the sun. There are two ways:
A. Use larger boxes and cut them at a 45 degree angle from front to back to begin with or B. build a rack to hold the oven so that it is angled to the sun. I. e., the top of the cooker should be pointing at the sun, if possible.
10. The cooker will need to be turned about every 20 to 30 minutes. Or, you can build your own simple solar powered Lazy Susan. Used to be one available on-line...
There ya go!
Last edited by EFLtrainer on Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:06 pm Post subject: Re: Reducing your carbon footprint |
|
|
EFLtrainer wrote: |
2. A guide from Time magazine on ways to reduce your carbon footprint.
51 Ways to Reduce |
Isn't Time magazine produced using electricity? Worse, it's printed on paper which is made from CO2 reducing trees! Hypocrites! If they were truly serious about addressing the problem rather than just promoting their antiCapitalism, antiGlobalization, antiNeolithic revolution, antiAmerican agenda in order to sell more magazines they would shut up shop right now!
(Boy, the Al Gore is quickly becoming my favourite fallacy.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Info only, please. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The_Conservative
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:48 pm Post subject: Re: Reducing your carbon footprint |
|
|
gang ah jee wrote: |
EFLtrainer wrote: |
2. A guide from Time magazine on ways to reduce your carbon footprint.
51 Ways to Reduce |
Isn't Time magazine produced using electricity? Worse, it's printed on paper which is made from CO2 reducing trees! Hypocrites! If they were truly serious about addressing the problem rather than just promoting their antiCapitalism, antiGlobalization, antiNeolithic revolution, antiAmerican agenda in order to sell more magazines they would shut up shop right now!
(Boy, the Al Gore is quickly becoming my favourite fallacy.) |
However, they buy emission credits...so that makes it all right.
Boy the Al Gore is quickly becoming my favorite poster boy to expose the hypocrisy of the left. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: Re: Reducing your carbon footprint |
|
|
The_Conservative wrote: |
Boy the Al Gore is quickly becoming my favorite poster boy to expose the hypocrisy of the left. |
Uh, you can't 'expose' anything with a logical fallacy. The 'Al Gore' by its normal name is the tu quoque. Anyway, you're aware that Gore supports carbon taxes over emission credits, right? How would you suggest he pay those carbon taxes at this point in time? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The_Conservative
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:48 pm Post subject: Re: Reducing your carbon footprint |
|
|
gang ah jee wrote: |
The_Conservative wrote: |
Boy the Al Gore is quickly becoming my favorite poster boy to expose the hypocrisy of the left. |
Uh, you can't 'expose' anything with a logical fallacy. The 'Al Gore' by its normal name is the tu quoque. Anyway, you're aware that Gore supports carbon taxes over emission credits, right? How would you suggest he pay those carbon taxes at this point in time? |
I would suggest he stop polluting so much at this point in time. Sell two of his three houses. There's a major reduction right there. Car-pool with some of his buddies (if he has any). Get on a plane only when absolutely necessary. Those would be good ways to reduce carbon emissions and he would be leading by example. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use handkerchiefs in place of kleenex. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: Re: Reducing your carbon footprint |
|
|
The_Conservative wrote: |
I would suggest he stop polluting so much at this point in time. Sell two of his three houses. There's a major reduction right there. Car-pool with some of his buddies (if he has any). Get on a plane only when absolutely necessary. Those would be good ways to reduce carbon emissions and he would be leading by example. |
Good suggestions. Why not let him know what you think? Address your letter to:
Honorable Al Gore
2100 West End Avenue
Suite 620 Nashville, TN 37203
(oh - and how does owning three houses produce more pollution? You sound like you're against owning property!) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The country with the lowest emissions is Chad. We should look to the lifestyle of the ordinary people of Chad and try to emulate that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think Gore argues gutting your life style. I think he just argues making some changes to obvious alternatives. If we can't get people to switch out their incandescent for fluorescent bulbs, it's little point asking for more changes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think you're all idiots. (Except the handkerchiefer.)
This could be a useful thread. Shut up and post something useful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
- Keep your own reusable stir stick for use at Starbucks. No oil is used to make it or no carbon absorbing tree dies to make it.
I remember at my student newspaper back in the late '80s, they introduced the "lug a mug" program. Instead of getting your coffee in a styrofoam cup, buy a plastic mug from the campus environmental club and buy your coffee in that. A rather novel concept in 1988. Alright. Whatever. Now our student newspaper had an op-ed page where students (not necessarily staff writers) could write longer opinion pieces. Very few students ever really bothered to write an op-ed piece, so it was mostly staff writers who filled that bit of news hole.
Anyway, one day a student came up and gave us his "anti lug-a-mug" op ed to run. Okay, fine. We ran it. Next week we got another anti lug-a-mug op ed piece from another student. Great. We ran that. Third week, we got a pro lug-a-mug piece. And then the week after we had a THIRD anti lug-a-mug piece. This was a huge mystery. I mean, 1988 was a turbulent era. We had free trade with the USA being negotiated, Reagan was talking about winning a nuclear war, there was apartheid in South Africa. There were lots of major social issues going down. But never a peep on them by the student body at large. Something about the lug-a-mug campaign just lit a fire under the butts of people.
After the third anti lug-a-mug article, the head of the campus environmental group came up to our offices. She was nearly in tears. She wanted to know just what the student paper had against them and the lug-a-mug. Why were we running this smear campaign?
The editor-in-chief explained we didn't have anything against them. He pointed out one of their lug-a-mugs sat on nearly every desk in our office. It's just that the op-ed piece was for student opinions and if we got one, and if it wasn't racist/sexist/homophobic, we pretty much ran it. Why people were all fired up about this issue was a mystery never solved. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
enns
Joined: 02 May 2006
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
...
Last edited by enns on Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
OiGirl

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: Hoke-y-gun
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. Handkerchiefs, ditto.
2. Reuseable tea mig, ditto.
3. Copy on both sides of all pieces of paper. (Recycle the leftovers of everyone else in the office.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
enns wrote: |
Here's an article from one of Canada's top national newspapers, the National Post. Have a read and let me know what you think. Will any collective actions of the world have a significant impact? If you disagree with the facts presented in this piece, please outline them. I'm curious more than anything about separating the politics from the science of GW.
...
It's hard to imagine how such a tiny amount of a benign substance could cause the end of the planet. Maybe Mr. Dion could explain that in his next press release. |
The columnist presents no actual science. He's making an argument from personal incredulity. He can't believe such a small amount can have a large effect. It's akin to someone saying "I can't believe that little bit of ricin could poison a 1,000 people..."
Quote: |
It could it be that the science is becoming less alarming as scientists learn more, so the UN wants to maximize the public hysteria before its catastrophic forecasts for the future can be checked against the more moderate scientific truth. |
False premise.
Quote: |
Yet the so-called "summaries for policy makers" are becoming more shrill each time: Species will be wiped out, crime will rise, starvation will kill hundreds of millions, disease will become rampant, islands will disappear beneath the waves, deserts will consume entire continents. |
Could be a strawman argument. Is that what the summaries are really saying? Will? Or are the summaries couched in the careful words of science. If x happens then there is the possibility, given the evidence, of y. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|