|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Adventurer
Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 7:52 pm Post subject: Cheney hits out at Pelosi visit |
 |
|
Last Updated: Friday, 6 April 2007, 03:32 GMT 04:32 UK
E-mail this to a friend Printable version
Cheney hits out at Pelosi visit
Mr Cheney said Ms Pelosi should leave foreign policy to Mr Bush
US Vice-President Dick Cheney has accused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of "bad behaviour" for holding talks with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Mr Cheney also told a radio station that Ms Pelosi bungled the delivery of a message from Israeli PM Ehud Olmert.
Ms Pelosi told Mr Assad Israel was "ready to engage in peace talks". Israel later said this was contingent on Syria ending "support for terror".
A spokesman for Ms Pelosi said she had made it clear the issues were linked.
The top Democrat met Mr Assad in the Syrian capital, Damascus, on Wednesday, before moving on to Saudi Arabia.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6532045.stm
[I think the VP thinks Pelosi overstepped her bounds as leader, but the Executive Branch has abused its powers, doesn't seem to be listening to the American people at all and even James Baker.
As far as Syria, it will be hard to stop supporting Hamas and Hezbollah without feeling it is taking a huge risk. Syria could back off of Lebanon and officially cede the Shebaa farms to Lebanon and let Israel and Lebanon negotiate an armistice, an end of hostilities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a Syrian's view of the situation.
| Quote: |
All the talk about Bush being opposed to her visit, therefore, would be no more than media jargon, intended for local consumption in the United States. This would mean that Pelosi was in Damascus because Bush wanted her to be in Damascus. Opposing the visit would save him a lot of face, given all his rising rhetoric in recent years on Syria.
Indeed, Bush has raised the anti-Syrian tone to such an extent that it has became too difficult for him to retreat without embarrassing himself. Bush realized he was wrong - the Syrians were right - and he needed a back channel to Damascus to help bring about stability to Lebanon and Palestine - and, more important, Iraq.
True, Pelosi was carrying a message from the Israelis, but the real substance of her visit was a message from Washington, DC. The real message was: we need the Syrians. |
My feeling is that none of this half as important as Saudi Arabia's strong language against the US. Thomas Friedman has his say...I'm posting it most of it because it is pay-to-view.
---------------------------------------------
Abdullah�s Chance
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Is Saudi Arabia becoming the new Egypt?
That�s a question you hear more and more these days in Arab circles, as Saudi Arabia�s King Abdullah becomes more diplomatically active and Egypt, the traditional leader of the Arab world, becomes more diplomatically passive.
In recent months, we�ve seen Saudi Arabia publicly blast Hezbollah for launching an unprovoked war on Israel; we�ve seen King Abdullah forge a cease-fire between Hamas and Fatah in Gaza; we�ve seen him try to tame Iran�s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and there are rumors that a top Saudi official met with Israel�s prime minister, Ehud Olmert. That meeting was apparently in preparation for the Arab summit in Riyadh, March 28-29, which King Abdullah will be hosting to revive his February 2002 peace overture to Israel of full normalization of relations in return for full withdrawal from the occupied territories.
Since Egypt, for now, seems to be adrift, and the Saudis seem to be afloat in oil revenues, it�s not surprising to see Saudi Arabia becoming more assertive. It could have real benefits � given the Saudis� standing in the Muslim world � provided that the leader of Saudi Arabia is ready to do what the leader of Egypt did when it comes to making peace with Israel.
What the moribund Israeli-Palestinian talks need most today is an emotional breakthrough. Another Arab declaration, just reaffirming the Abdullah initiative, won�t cut it. If King Abdullah wants to lead � and he has the integrity and credibility to do so � he needs to fly from the Riyadh summit to Jerusalem and deliver the offer personally to the Israeli people. That is what Egypt�s Anwar Sadat did when he forged his breakthrough. If King Abdullah did the same, he could end this conflict once and for all.
I would humbly suggest the Saudi king make four stops. His first stop should be to Al Aksa Mosque in East Jerusalem, the third holiest site in Islam. There, he, the custodian of Mecca and Medina, could reaffirm the Muslim claim to Arab East Jerusalem by praying at Al Aksa.
From there, he could travel to Ramallah and address the Palestinian parliament, making clear that the Abdullah initiative aims to give Palestinians the leverage to offer Israel peace with the whole Arab world in return for full withdrawal. And he might add that whatever deal the Palestinians cut with Israel regarding return of refugees or land swaps � so some settlements might stay in the West Bank in return for the Palestinians getting pieces of Israel � the Arab world would support.
From there, King Abdullah could helicopter to Yad Vashem, the memorial to the six million Jews killed in the Holocaust. A visit there would seal the deal with Israelis and affirm that the Muslim world rejects the Holocaust denialism of Iran. Then he could go to the Israeli parliament and formally deliver his peace initiative.
Of course, I have no illusions about this. But is it any more illusory than thinking that the incrementalism of the last seven years is going to get anywhere? Now that�s a fantasy. Yes, Al Qaeda would denounce King Abdullah. What else is new? The Saudi ruling family is going to have to decide: Is it going to spend the rest of its days tiptoeing around Al Qaeda, or is it going to confront it � ideologically � head on? Many more Muslims would applaud the Saudi king for such an overture. And I have no doubt that Israel�s majority, which was ready to evacuate Gaza for nothing, would demand that the Israeli government respond positively to an Abdullah initiative delivered in this way.
This would also be a vehicle to tell Hamas to put up or shut up. It is one thing for Hamas to reject the Oslo peace accords. But how could it reject a peace overture to Israel presented by Saudi Arabia?
King Abdullah first unveiled his peace proposal in an interview he and I did in his home in Riyadh in 2002. As we sat by his desk, he told me he was motivated to propose full peace for full withdrawal to the Israelis because �I wanted to find a way to make clear to the Israeli people that the Arabs don�t reject or despise them. But the Arab people do reject what their leadership is now doing to the Palestinians, which is inhumane and oppressive. And I thought of this as a possible signal to the Israeli people.�
Well, it is time to go beyond signals. If the Saudi king just wants to score some points, he will hold the Arab summit, re-issue the peace plan and go home. If he wants to make history and make peace, he will hold the Arab summit, re-issue the peace plan and deliver it in person.
---------------------------------- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
