|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:19 am Post subject: The liberal arts and jobs |
|
|
Perhaps an answer to the question of why so many Canadians in Korea?..
Quote: |
What degree will get me a job?
Most experts say today�s young need more schooling�but there are dissenters
Cameron Ainsworth-Vincze | Mar 22, 2007 | 10:24 am EST
Most experts believe that to land the best jobs, you will need at least a university or college degree, or a trades skill�and that far more kids than ever should be enrolling in higher education. A recent study by the Canadian Council on Learning concluded that Canada needs 70 per cent of its workforce to have a post-secondary education by 2016, a massive increase from the 44 per cent of Canadian workers who currently have some form of post-secondary education. The government of Ontario predicts that 60 per cent of new jobs created by 2009 will require post-secondary education; B.C. expects that by 2013, 70 per cent of all new jobs will call for at least some post-secondary training.
But if the consensus view is, �get more education,� what education should you get?
�It is very risky to think that there is going to be a job in a certain field in five to 10 years, and focus your whole life on trying to fill that niche,� says Don Drummond, chief economist at TD Canada Trust. �Because jobs available in five or 10 years might not be the same ones you previously thought about�they might not even exist today.� James Turk, executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, notes that certain markets can turn on a dime. �In 1998 there was a desperate need for computer science skills, then what appeared to be a market shortage changed almost overnight into a desperate oversupply.� Drummond points to another example. �People were saying in the late 1990s that there wouldn�t be another oil well drilled in Canada for the rest of our lives when it was in the basement at $10 [a barrel]. It�s become the hottest area of economic activity. Who would have known that?�
To prepare for tomorrow�s job market, Drummond says an education is important, but narrowing in on a specific field of expertise isn�t necessarily beneficial. �My advice to people is to train your mind and your capacities first and the subject matter is probably of secondary importance,� he says. Michael Bloom, vice-president of organizational effectiveness and learning at the Conference Board of Canada, adds that young people should be open to all types of post-secondary training and not be fixated on the idea that a university education is the only key to a successful, enjoyable career. �Don�t be put off by the fact that the system emphasizes university,� says Bloom. �You can go to college, you can do an apprenticeship and have a great career that people admire.�
The more-schooling-is-always-better view is not, however, unanimous. In their upcoming book, Ivory Tower Blues, University of Western Ontario sociology professors James C�t� and Anton Allahar write that in the 1990s, Canada graduated twice as many university students as there were jobs created requiring a university degree. And, they say, more than four times the number of community college graduates came out of the system than could be absorbed in new jobs requiring a college education. There are lots of jobs out there�but in their view, many do not call for a university education. �We�re pushing them [students] with this kind of job preparation mentality that is not factual,� says C�t�. �Liberal arts education is not job training except for being a liberal arts professor. Very few of them are going to do that.� |
http://www.macleans.ca/article.jsp?content=20070322_102427_4568
Was liberal arts a mistake for you? For me, 100% yes. I would have had far more career options had I not switched from sciences to arts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Being married to a former manager and having a father who has performed MANY MANY job interviews, there is one thing that should be said:
Possessing a degree tells employers that the interviewee has the wherewithal to work and the dedication to finish her project (though it depends on the job).
I'm not sure I'd agree with that sentiment outright, but that's what they've said to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
khyber wrote: |
Being married to a former manager and having a father who has performed MANY MANY job interviews, there is one thing that should be said:
Possessing a degree tells employers that the interviewee has the wherewithal to work and the dedication to finish her project (though it depends on the job).
I'm not sure I'd agree with that sentiment outright, but that's what they've said to me. |
I think of BAs as fences. You need a certain minimum to get over the fence. Some find other ways around the fence so it's not a 100% guarantee of anything. I think getting a BA and combining that with a 2 year college education in a skill is a better combination (web development, culinary arts, medical technician, real estate sales, etc.). I've not felt limited by only having a BA in social science, which may as well be a liberal arts degree. I learned computer skills, journalism, radio/tv production, et al on my own, both while going to university and on the job.
Life is effort. That's about the sum total. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with mindmetoo...college is just the beginning. Get you degree but pick up skills along the way. if you are great at something but dont have the degree you will beat out those with the sheepskin at the end anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would have been nice had I picked up some skills in the expensive crap-shoot that was university. I only have myself to blame, but geeze, what a waste of money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree. For me the Biochem degree I got was basically 4 years of wasted time. I was good at science, though never passionate about it. having a father who was an inorganic chem professor, I suppose it was just a natural thing to do. I regret that now though, and if I was to do it all over again I would pursue a totally different major. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jinju wrote: |
I agree. For me the Biochem degree I got was basically 4 years of wasted time. I was good at science, though never passionate about it. having a father who was an inorganic chem professor, I suppose it was just a natural thing to do. I regret that now though, and if I was to do it all over again I would pursue a totally different major. |
I started in economics and finance, and switched to history and sociology. My classmates from econ/fin are doing very well. I'm now trying to make up for this mistake with post-grad work in econ/fin. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BJWD wrote: |
jinju wrote: |
I agree. For me the Biochem degree I got was basically 4 years of wasted time. I was good at science, though never passionate about it. having a father who was an inorganic chem professor, I suppose it was just a natural thing to do. I regret that now though, and if I was to do it all over again I would pursue a totally different major. |
I started in economics and finance, and switched to history and sociology. My classmates from econ/fin are doing very well. I'm now trying to make up for this mistake with post-grad work in econ/fin. |
I did biochem, I would have done photography/photojournalism. Not to develop skills as much as to get contacts as thats the best way. However I sometimes think what would have happeend to me then? Most likely no Korea and that means I would have never met my wife....so its kind of stupid to regret decisions Ive made along those lines. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't regret getting my degree and a teaching certificate in social studies. I wish I did a lot earlier. I would study business or economics for graduate work. I think it is okay to have a liberal arts degree if you plan on going to law school or you combine it with a degree in business. You can get a decent job with any degree if you have good people skills, and you are presentable. You may not make a ton of money. That is true. However, some of the richest people never got a degree. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To speak more to BJWD's bolded point: one of the problems in Canada "college" is synonymous with "High School for older losers". You simply DON'T go to college if you have some grey matter affixed to the brain stem. College of course teaches important skills being filled by immigrants: welding, plumbing, etc. If you have a skill, plus brains, plus a university degree, you can go very far. You won't have to work in the trenches for long. My friend is a chef. He got his BA first, went to George Brown and got his chef's papers. He didn't stay in the kitchen for long. At one point the head chef at the Royal York listed him as one of the upcoming chefs in Toronto.
As Korean parents can't accept something other than SKY for their kids, Canadian parents make the same mistake about a university education, I think. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Poemer
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Location: Mullae
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
The title of this thread ecapsulates the problem nicely, and it can be summed up with one brief question, namely: What does a liberal arts degree have to do with a job anyway?
The whole theory behind the comprehensive course of study is to create a well-rounded individual, a rational, informed citizen of the world. For years nobody expected to be able to get a job because they were educated. People expected to get jobs because they were trained for them, or because they had connections.
The poor trained; the rich had time to "better" themselves before moving on to their appointed station. As the dividing line between rich and poor became more blurry, "education" became a magic word, a great equalizer.
The fallacy of this notion is becoming quite obvious as more and more people see college as some sort of magic doorway into a middle class lifestyle. The system of college education has become caught between two worlds, it clings tenaciously to the idea of creating better people, while at the same time selling the more attractive product of a future career to potential customers. It dedicates itself fully to neither task, and so, it accomplishes neither goal. Colleges graduate students who were neither passionate about, nor personally invested in their areas of study and so failed to learn what "lessons" their studies offered because they saw them as only a means to an end. But, soon after graduating they discover that their degree isn't the magic piece of paper they thought it would be.
If you are going to college to secure your financial future you are kidding yourself unless you study in a very few select areas. If you go to college with the intent to study in an area that you find intellectually stimulating for the purpose of widening your perspective you'll find plenty of programs that suit you.
For most college applicants other avenues would be better worth exploring, but college is too magical a lure to resist. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poemer wrote: |
If you go to college with the intent to study in an area that you find intellectually stimulating for the purpose of widening your perspective you'll find plenty of programs that suit you. |
Bingo. Excellent response, Poemer.
Personally, I am a great believer in the non-vocational liberal education. Although I must addend that by saying I don't think many American liberal arts programs are worth what those who attend them pay. Put me in with mindmetoo for endorsing the 'BA supplemented by 2-year vocational training' route. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
postfundie

Joined: 28 May 2004
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did sociology and history and I have mixed feelings about it..On one hand if I were rich it would be great just to take history classes for the rest of my life. Also the sociology stuff wasn't so bad and I ended up working in the Social work field for 2 years after school....One the other hand I wish I would have studied something much more practical..I 'm making up for it now so alls well that ends well... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
While not by any means wealthy, i'm on the whole quite healthy & happy.
A lot of it i suppose boils down to a question of the state of one's values, vision & ability to find inner peace. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems to me that there is a deeper structural problem: Canada has an economy that (IMHO) promotes jobless economic growth. I don't think the (only) problem is having too many university graduates; I think a big part of the problem is that job creation is considered of secondary or marginal importance compared to maximizing profit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|