| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori
Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: Above it all
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:45 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| You mean "video gamers neglect thier baby". Absolutely no connection to meat eating there. While the vegan case a while definitely was connected thier dietery regime. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rteacher
Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| meat eaters eat babies and mothers ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bramble
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Terrible story, but good headline. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Absolutely no connection to meat eating there. While the vegan case a while definitely was connected thier dietery regime. |
no it wasn't. As was CLEARLY explained in the article (and as the lawyer was quoted), it wasn't a diet issue. They weren't giving the baby enough food. Period. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bramble
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| khyber wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Absolutely no connection to meat eating there. While the vegan case a while definitely was connected thier dietery regime. |
no it wasn't. As was CLEARLY explained in the article (and as the lawyer was quoted), it wasn't a diet issue. They weren't giving the baby enough food. Period. |
Thanks. If Satori still isn't convinced, there are a ton of links in the other thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Satori
Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: Above it all
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| They may have under fed it, but they were also giving it the wrong food which was harmful. If they had simply underfed it but the food that it did get was nutritious it might be alive today. Thier absurd dietary beliefs contributed to it`s death. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bramble
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
| They may have under fed it, but they were also giving it the wrong food which was harmful. If they had simply underfed it but the food that it did get was nutritious it might be alive today. Thier absurd dietary beliefs contributed to it`s death. |
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Do a search and look up the facts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| They may have under fed it, but they were also giving it the wrong food which was harmful. If they had simply underfed it but the food that it did get was nutritious it might be alive today. Thier absurd dietary beliefs contributed to it`s death. |
Key phrase "under fed".
Key idea: They didn't feed it enough food.
Not key idea: Type of food.
As mentioned by Bramble:
| Quote: |
| Wrong, wrong, wrong. Do a search and look up the facts. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
freethought
Joined: 13 Mar 2005
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| a better angle/point to make is the number of obese children eating meat. Not just babies, but children of all ages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| freethought wrote: |
| a better angle/point to make is the number of obese children eating meat. Not just babies, but children of all ages. |
An even better angle/point to make is the number of obese children that eat boatloads of sugar. Not just children eating meat.
sheez, you veggies just don't quit, do you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
idonojacs
Joined: 07 Jun 2007
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Good thing them meat-eatin video-gamers weren't a hankerin for some baby back ribs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bramble
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wannago wrote: |
| freethought wrote: |
| a better angle/point to make is the number of obese children eating meat. Not just babies, but children of all ages. |
An even better angle/point to make is the number of obese children that eat boatloads of sugar. Not just children eating meat.
sheez, you veggies just don't quit, do you? |
But it's still mostly meat-eating parents feeding their kids boatloads of sugar, refined flour, white rice, fried s*it, etc. Isn't it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bramble wrote: |
| wannago wrote: |
| freethought wrote: |
| a better angle/point to make is the number of obese children eating meat. Not just babies, but children of all ages. |
An even better angle/point to make is the number of obese children that eat boatloads of sugar. Not just children eating meat.
sheez, you veggies just don't quit, do you? |
But it's still mostly meat-eating parents feeding their kids boatloads of sugar, refined flour, white rice, fried s*it, etc. Isn't it? |
Is it? Or is that what you vegan friends have brainwashed you to believe? My vegetarian friends (not militant vegans like you) eat white rice, sugar, and refined flour. I guess they're just not as morally superior as you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Big_Bird
Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| freethought wrote: |
| a better angle/point to make is the number of obese children eating meat. Not just babies, but children of all ages. |
I think the point of the OP was to point out how irrelevant the 'vegan parents' headline was in another instance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
