View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 3:35 am Post subject: Grammar Q: has died / had died |
|
|
Hi, a friend asked me about this. She, an EFL learner, learned that "had died" is correct and is confused when she hears 'has died." Has died sounds more natural to me, and I did a google battle and "has died" won. I mentioned to her that I thought it would depend on the context, and whether the information of the death is necessarily new or not. "He had died" could mean he expired in 1880, 1990, or yesterday. However, I searched around the internet and coulnd't find a proper explanation.
She also wrote this: one of my English teachers who
is Taiwanese said that we shouldn't say "has/have
died" because it sounds like the dead person would be
back to life and then die again. What he meant is
that the word "die" is more like a "condition" than an
"action". What he meant is that similar words are
"love", "like". Those words are all verbs, but you
can't really see the "action", unlike verbs like
"play", "talk", "jump", "run" etc.
Can anybody help me out? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
"To die" is a finished action. The only was it can properly be used is in the past simple.
My mother died.
The only other explanation could be if it were recently. Then you might say, "has passed away" or "has died". The only time you would use "had" would be when referring to the past where the action took place in a time recently related to the action: "I was at a hockey game when I heard that my mother had passed away".
Past simple is the correct form though: "I was at a hockey game when I heard that my mother passed away".
Using present or past perfect in the above cases is what I might consider a more formal or polite way of speaking. It has a nicer ring to it.
That's what I think.
I think that "has been" or "had been" with "dead" or "no longer with us" is grammatically correct.
Last edited by yingwenlaoshi on Fri May 25, 2007 5:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tomato

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried using "present perfect" and "past perfect" as search words?
"has died" is present perfect tense and "had died" is past perfect tense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
tomato wrote: |
Have you tried using "present perfect" and "past perfect" as search words?
"has died" is present perfect tense and "had died" is past perfect tense. |
That's what I meant in this sentence:
Quote: |
Using present or past perfect in the above cases is what I might consider a more formal or polite way of speaking. |
I originally wrote "simple", but meant "perfect". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
yingwenlaoshi wrote: |
"To die" is a finished action. The only was it can properly be used is in the past simple.
My mother died.
The only other explanation could be if it were recently. Then you might say, "has passed away" or "has died". The only time you would use "had" would be when referring to the past where the action took place in a time recently related to the action: "I was at a hockey game when I heard that my mother had passed away".
Past simple is the correct form though: "I was at a hockey game when I heard that my mother passed away".
Using present or past perfect in the above cases is what I might consider a more formal or polite way of speaking. It has a nicer ring to it.
That's what I think.
I think that "has been" or "had been" with "dead" or "no longer with us" is grammatically correct. |
The bolded statement is simply inaccurate, as your discussion afterward makes clear, so why say it?. Don't confuse things worse by mixing up the use of euphemisms with tense choice.
The verb 'die' can be used in both the present perfect ('has died') and past perfect ('had died'). That's what your google search tells you, OP. That's what building concordances for these forms at www.lextutor.ca will tell you as well.
You are right, OP, that the issue is one of context. Both Past perfect and present perfect are generally used in relation to past simple in discourse as markers of background information (while past simple is used to indicate the main information). A good example of this is the obituary genre. Obituaries in newspapers generally follow a particular tense structure. The headline will be be in present simple: X dies at 90. The first sentence of the text will often be in present perfect: X has died after a long illness. The main text of the obit will then continuer in the past simple. What this structure tells us is that an obituary is not about a person dying, but more about what they did in their life. The present simple and present perfect forms provide a frame (background) to the details of the person's life in the past simple.
Within the obituary text, the past simple will be used to indicate background information to events in the past narrative of the person's life. Here's an example from the obit of a businessman famed for surviving a kidnapping attempt in today's NYTimes:
Quote: |
On the morning of Aug. 4, 1993, Mr. Weinstein had just finished his usual breakfast at a diner on Northern Boulevard when two men � later identified as Mr. Rodriguez and his brother Francisco Rodriguez � forced him into a car as he walked through the parking lot. |
Notice how the past perfect indicates non-essential information - finishing breakfast - that provides background to the main story - getting kidnapped. The narrative could be reacst with both forms in the past simple (it would require breaking it into two sentences), but that would be informationally unbalanced, giving too much importance to the fact that the kidnapping took place after breakfast.
The present perfect sentence at the start of the obit text seems to be optional; the present simple headline may be enough of a frame by itself. Notice to that many obits will close the frame by returning to the present in the final sentence with something like this: "Funeral arrangements are pending," with the tense shift signalling the end of the narrative.
I wrote in response to a different post a couple weeks ago about use of the past perfect. Look up my post history to find it.
But, yeah, in the right context, either perfect form is possible. Understanding how they work in texts explains why we need to teach language as discourse and not just as sets of forms. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I guess I should've said "If you really look at it, logically it should only be in the past simple tense."
Right? Wrong?
I was high on coffee and hungry when I typed that. As I am right now. But anyway.
If you can use (and you can) present perfect then you can use past pefect.
"I'm sorry, but your mother has passed away." (It's not proper to say "died" here)
I was eating a donut when I heard that my mother had passed away. ("passed away" or "died" are both ok, but "passed away" is much better).
I don't think we should ever use "died" or "dead" when it's someone close to the affected person.
Am I wrong, Mr. Nit Picky? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tomato

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
You have to be careful in speaking Korean, too.
지나가다 is more acceptable than 죽다. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
After my mother died (had died? passed away? had passed away?- I think it's "died"), my nephew said to my father on the phone, "I'm sorry Grandma is dead." My sister freaked out a little. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Present simple is the most correct. End of story. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
faster

Joined: 03 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
By the time the doctor arrived, unfortunately, the patient had died.
Is anyone seriously willing to argue that the above sentence is wrong? If so, I'd love to read an explanation for such a preposterous belief. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"She has died" - a recent event, a past event with results affecting the immediate present, i.e. grief, funeral arrangements, doctor's reports, etc. (Present Perfect)
"She died" - an event in the past, at a definite time. (Simple Past)
"She had died" - an event in the past that takes place before the other past events in the main narrative, a.k.a. the past before the past. (Past Perfect)
OP: I think your student is probably confused about when to use the Present Perfect. She/He knows they can't say "She has died" about a death that took place some years ago, but doesn't know why and is just using Past Perfect in a misguided attempt to cover all situations. Just my guess. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
faster wrote: |
By the time the doctor arrived, unfortunately, the patient had died.
Is anyone seriously willing to argue that the above sentence is wrong? If so, I'd love to read an explanation for such a preposterous belief. |
Yes, I'm wrong. Hoo hoo ha ha ha.
Has to do with it happening in immediate time(?) and affecting the people around the dead person. The death affects the people that are still alive. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
faster

Joined: 03 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yingwenlaoshi wrote: |
faster wrote: |
By the time the doctor arrived, unfortunately, the patient had died.
Is anyone seriously willing to argue that the above sentence is wrong? If so, I'd love to read an explanation for such a preposterous belief. |
Yes, I'm wrong. Hoo hoo ha ha ha.
Has to do with it happening in immediate time(?) and affecting the people around the dead person. The death affects the people that are still alive. |
No, it has to do with reference to an event in the past that occurred after the death. Not too complex, really, come on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
faster wrote: |
yingwenlaoshi wrote: |
faster wrote: |
By the time the doctor arrived, unfortunately, the patient had died.
Is anyone seriously willing to argue that the above sentence is wrong? If so, I'd love to read an explanation for such a preposterous belief. |
Yes, I'm wrong. Hoo hoo ha ha ha.
Has to do with it happening in immediate time(?) and affecting the people around the dead person. The death affects the people that are still alive. |
No, it has to do with reference to an event in the past that occurred after the death. Not too complex, really, come on. |
Ok, Sunshine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Krainium
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Grammar Q: has died / had died |
Holy crap! When did he die?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|