Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Israel's 'modesty buses' draw criticism...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:17 am    Post subject: Israel's 'modesty buses' draw criticism... Reply with quote

Last Updated: Tuesday, 24 April 2007, 07:43 GMT 08:43 UK

E-mail this to a friend Printable version

Israel's 'modesty buses' draw fire
By Katya Adler
BBC News, Jerusalem



Women sit separately from men on Israel's "modesty buses"
The other day I was waiting for a bus in downtown Jerusalem. I was in the bustling orthodox Jewish neighbourhood of Mea Sharim and the bus stop was extremely crowded.

When the Number 40 bus arrived, the most curious thing happened. Husbands left heavily pregnant wives or spouses struggling with prams and pushchairs to fend for themselves as they and all other male passengers got on at the front of the bus.

Women moved towards the rear door to get on at the back.

When on the bus, I tried to buck the system, moving my way towards the driver but was pushed back towards the other women.

These are what orthodox Jews call "modesty buses".

'Abuse and threats'

Naomi Regen is one of a group of women now taking the separation bus system to court. She is an orthodox Jew herself.

"I wasn't trying to start a revolution, all I wanted to do was get home," she tells me.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6584661.stm


Last edited by Adventurer on Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, BJWD, what do you have to say about this one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm just glad the headline isn't meant to be read literally.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sure based on this one case, he'll start frothing at the mouth and begin a tirade and campaign against Jews. Backward, illiterate, they come and take our jobs and are over running Europe......look how they treat their women! Look, they even make 'em fight in the damn army! Look, they exclude others (no Jewish mother, get lost!), Look! they only want money and use this to terrorize poor nations. Look! they are taking over America. Look, they say drive all heathens out of Palestine!

My point being, his assertions of Muslim, all Muslims as being "a threat" to us -- are just that. Drum beating by a little boy. As with my above.

I've enjoyed watching the program "Couscous and Cola" on Al Jezeera recently. Along with their 48, a great and insightful program, showing how these young, Dutch Muslims think and view the world. We need more of this kind of thing. Anyone else seen it?

DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
postfundie



Joined: 28 May 2004

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is why Religion has a tendency to suck ass.....Those practicing Jews who came up with this crap need to get real...Funny how I haven't seen you post anything about this DD? well about Muslims that is....You'd chime in on Jews but would you start a thread about Muslims? Oh no wait its more important to speak of all the great benefits of Al Jazeera.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

postfundie wrote:
This is why Religion has a tendency to suck ass.....Those practicing Jews who came up with this crap need to get real...Funny how I haven't seen you post anything about this DD? well about Muslims that is....You'd chime in on Jews but would you start a thread about Muslims? Oh no wait its more important to speak of all the great benefits of Al Jazeera.....


What do you want Ddeubel to do more than that when criticizing Jews while having an Ashkenazi name, I gather. It takes a lot criticize your own sometimes whether you're Jewish or American or whatever... The Jewish community looks down heavily on the intellectuals who criticize this or that in the community. However, it is easier to criticize religious Jews than to criticize Israel. That is a religious cow that can't be touch so easily. Muslims sometimes also fear to criticize those around them, but they are doing more of that because the feces hit the fan.

He commented on the Orthodox who expect secular Jews to defend them while they sit on their duff and will harass Jews in Jerusalem who are liberal. When has BJWD commented on something like this? Maybe he or she has, but I haven't seen that. He did criticize Junior for being indifferent to the Srebernica Massacre. I will say I saw that.

I think the world doesn't need more religious fanaticism and I think there is a triangle of fanaticism playing against each other... American religious Jesus freaks, Israel worshippers, Muslim fanatics... They justify each other's presence and fundamentalist ways. The seculars from all camps and spiritual ones need to band together in a sane way and put a stop to them...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ddeubel wrote:
I'm sure based on this one case, he'll start frothing at the mouth and begin a tirade and campaign against Jews. Backward, illiterate, they come and take our jobs and are over running Europe......look how they treat their women! Look, they even make 'em fight in the damn army! Look, they exclude others (no Jewish mother, get lost!), Look! they only want money and use this to terrorize poor nations. Look! they are taking over America. Look, they say drive all heathens out of Palestine!

Cool

ddeubel wrote:
I've enjoyed watching the program "Couscous and Cola" on Al Jezeera recently. Along with their 48, a great and insightful program, showing how these young, Dutch Muslims think and view the world. We need more of this kind of thing. Anyone else seen it?


It sounds very interesting, DD. I'd like to see it. I recently watched a documentary featuring young people in Iran expressing their views and discussing their feelings about the political systems there. It's a shame some of the funny little monkeys posting here couldn't have watched it. Inconviently rational and likeable they were.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
postfundie



Joined: 28 May 2004

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What do you want Ddeubel to do more than that when criticizing Jews while having an Ashkenazi name, I gather. It takes a lot criticize your own sometimes whether you're Jewish or American or whatever... The Jewish community looks down heavily on the intellectuals who criticize this or that in the community. However, it is easier to criticize religious Jews than to criticize Israel. That is a religious cow that can't be touch so easily. Muslims sometimes also fear to criticize those around them, but they are doing more of that because the feces hit the fan.

He commented on the Orthodox who expect secular Jews to defend them while they sit on their duff and will harass Jews in Jerusalem who are liberal. When has BJWD commented on something like this? Maybe he or she has, but I haven't seen that. He did criticize Junior for being indifferent to the Srebernica Massacre. I will say I saw that.



I think it's fair to say that BJWD is an all around religious hater....that is hating stupid crap that religious people make up and tell the rest of us that we have to follow...I seem to remember him saying that quite often....you wanna bring up harassment of liberal Jews in Israel...good.....Thing is this is a minority compared to the harassment that goes on Islamic countries...


Also if DD and BB if the link is so good post it here....got no problems with seeing what 's out there, but I do have problems with those who praise Al 'terrorist' support Jazeera
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

postfundie wrote:
Quote:
What do you want Ddeubel to do more than that when criticizing Jews while having an Ashkenazi name, I gather. It takes a lot criticize your own sometimes whether you're Jewish or American or whatever... The Jewish community looks down heavily on the intellectuals who criticize this or that in the community. However, it is easier to criticize religious Jews than to criticize Israel. That is a religious cow that can't be touch so easily. Muslims sometimes also fear to criticize those around them, but they are doing more of that because the feces hit the fan.

He commented on the Orthodox who expect secular Jews to defend them while they sit on their duff and will harass Jews in Jerusalem who are liberal. When has BJWD commented on something like this? Maybe he or she has, but I haven't seen that. He did criticize Junior for being indifferent to the Srebernica Massacre. I will say I saw that.



I think it's fair to say that BJWD is an all around religious hater....that is hating stupid crap that religious people make up and tell the rest of us that we have to follow...I seem to remember him saying that quite often....you wanna bring up harassment of liberal Jews in Israel...good.....Thing is this is a minority compared to the harassment that goes on Islamic countries...


Also if DD and BB if the link is so good post it here....got no problems with seeing what 's out there, but I do have problems with those who praise Al 'terrorist' support Jazeera


That doesn't cut it. If you are balanced, then you will criticize in an explicit way across-the-board. I mean if you can quote the Quran, why not quote the Torah? What is stopping him? Chomsky is an all around critic of religion, but he doesn't go around being subjective about religions. I am not talking about whether BJWD is a nice girl or guy.
That is irrelevant. I am just wondering why secular Jews being harassed isn't worthy of mention or these religious fellows may feel they are sanctioned by the Torah to harass those who don't think like them.


Maxime Rodinson, a French Marxist, who happened to be Jewish saw Islam in a sort of balanced way with all its different facets, though he was no believer in Islam, obviously. As far as Al Jazeera, in some ways it is not worse than some of the American networks. What American networks talked about the violation of international law in depth when Iraq was invaded? What sympathy was there for those who believed in international law? I didn't really see much of that. You can argue no such violations happened, but I watched on satellite the Europeans discuss that.
No real talk of that in the U.S. Why not?

Al Jazeera is also the network that featured the Syrian lady Dr. Wafa Sultan who openly said she was an atheist, and she ridiculed the Islamic world worse than that British fellow did on the link BJWD quoted. They knew she was an atheist before hand. So for a Middle Eastern network, it does have its fair share of problems, but so do the American networks which just seemed to be drum beating for war before it happened.
I understand Al Jazeera features Israelis from the Left, Russians, pretty much anyone. Has it shown videos high lighting the cause of Al Qaeda.
Yes, but it doesn't mean they support Al Qaeda. That is a stretch. Are they balanced? No.

I think DD is more honest about being against fanatical religions.
He responds to fanatacism from all religious groups. If you claim you are, whoever you are, then you should be clear about it. At least, that is my opinion. I am not asking for someone to be a Maxime Rodinson but to approach things in a more balanced, scientific way and look at people as people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
postfundie



Joined: 28 May 2004

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you mind putting up a post where DD has droned on and on about the Islam?

Quote:
. I mean if you can quote the Quran, why not quote the Torah? What is stopping him? Chomsky is an all around critic of religion, but he doesn't go around being subjective about religions. I am not talking about whether BJWD is a nice girl or guy.
That is irrelevant. I am just wondering why secular Jews being harassed isn't worthy of mention or these religious fellows may feel they are sanctioned by the Torah to harass those who don't think like them.


Chomsky hard on Islam.??...hahh I have a lecture on my Ipod about Islam not being the enemy.....I'll let you guess who he thinks the real enemy is.....(hint its not about speaking the power to relgious institutions or ideology)


Secular Jews being mentioned is worthy but the harassment they receive is nothing compared to what goes on in Muslim countries...Not even close....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

postfundie wrote:
Do you mind putting up a post where DD has droned on and on about the Islam?

Quote:
. I mean if you can quote the Quran, why not quote the Torah? What is stopping him? Chomsky is an all around critic of religion, but he doesn't go around being subjective about religions. I am not talking about whether BJWD is a nice girl or guy.
That is irrelevant. I am just wondering why secular Jews being harassed isn't worthy of mention or these religious fellows may feel they are sanctioned by the Torah to harass those who don't think like them.


Chomsky hard on Islam.??...hahh I have a lecture on my Ipod about Islam not being the enemy.....I'll let you guess who he thinks the real enemy is.....(hint its not about speaking the power to relgious institutions or ideology)


Secular Jews being mentioned is worthy but the harassment they receive is nothing compared to what goes on in Muslim countries...Not even close....


Chomsky is Jewish and feels more sympathy vis-a-vis the occupied Palestinians. Many Jews do feel that way as they oppose the occupation of other countries or lands or the subjugation of others. It is a Leftist perspective. It is not synonymous with approving of Islamic thinking that you disapprove of in the end. Judaism is not a problem per se, Islam is not a problem per se or Christianity or Hinduism. The problem lies with people and how they implement their religions. I have not heard what Chomsky said about Islam. But he didn't say Judaism was a problem.
I have heard scholars from the Jewish side point to Jewish radicals.

You are correct that you are better off being an atheist and Jewish in Israel rather than in a Muslim country. There are many places in Israel, especially in Netanya or Tel Aviv where you can feel very comfortable as someone completely a-religious and also in Haifa. One could say that is true in some parts of Beirut. My point is there is a serious problem with religious fanatacism from all sides fueling conflicts, divisions. You also forget that if Israel was not under seige, it is possible there would more internal fighting in Israel. Israel acts more like one people, because it has many enemies in the neighorhood. The state of conflict in the region helps fuel the fanatics and also helps fuel a possible social truce between the religious and secular elements in Israel while in the Arab world they have to be very vocal and use the army etc...

I don't know what DD has said about Islam in detail, but he has attacked fanatacism among Muslims from what I recall. I am not his keeper, defender. But I have seen him criticize fanatacism in that region in general. Just because the other countries are worse doesn't mean we should ignore the others. That's my point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adventurer,

You've stated my position and beliefs quite correctly, if only in general.

I for one have written about both Muslim and non Muslim countries and their abuses and wicked human rights records. But my point is

1. postfundie and many others just want an enemy, actually feel safer with a well defined enemy. This is the key to the success of all fascism, appealing to that inner need of people to believe in a boogie man/barbarian at the gates.

2. Muslims come in all sorts of varieties, as do their countries. [I think bb made this point continually and succinctly also]. It isn't easy to just label and say they should all be driven away, they are all animals/beasts , aggressive etc....Look at Egypt. An ally but hoooooorible when it comes to abusing honest citizens. You almost have to support the Brotherhood because of this. Who on this board, postfundie and all, have posted about el Atir, or even worse in my mind, the blogger Karem Amer, wasting away....tortured, all without the U.S. putting pressure on this "friend".

I've written about Iran and in particular its horrible record vis a vis minorities and especially women / journalists. I've written with distane for how we have glossed over the Libyans slaughtered by Khaddafi, while crying out for those killed at Lockerbie. This is just geopoloticing around the truth..... The kurds, nobody gave a rats ass about them for years...now all the sharks are saying, WOW what a great job we've done, liberating them! Bull tweet, I say!

This world and governments have to stand by some standards or be castigated and condemned. Israel/U.S. or Arab and Muslim nations. It is a point about countries, NOT religion. Invading another country, bombing, using torture, denying people their full rights are things not particular to a religion but a way of governance.........so I just think so many always screaming at the Muslims should do so correctly and drop the religious hate.

DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
postfundie



Joined: 28 May 2004

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
1. postfundie and many others just want an enemy, actually feel safer with a well defined enemy. This is the key to the success of all fascism, appealing to that inner need of people to believe in a boogie man/barbarian at the gates.


120% not true...I don't just want an an enemy....I grew up with crapy relgious beliefs and I Hate seeing others having to suffer under a bunch of made up crap by a crazy man in a cave....


since you love to encourage us all so much to look in the mirror, why don't you take some time to think about whether or not you think the US is your big boogeyman...?

.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Postfundie,

I copied this below from what I wrote on my website. I would also add that I love America and she is a sparkling light (still) for the world. But as I've said many , many times, I disagree with her addiction to the military/war . So do many, many other fine scholars and even some who were professional soldiers ( I'm thinking in particular of Andrew Bacevich
who wrote a very powerful work on this topic.). I'm against an America which promotes war for profit and which will eventually hurt and pull down the country into bankruptcy and loss. (if it hasn't already). I"m against the power politics of America.

But what I praise is below, everything Whitman said and more......I find American generosity of spirit, her intelligence and diversity at the edges, her openess to change, the individiual - I find all this great.

But too many Americans such as yourself have been duped recently and I think much of that has come due to America's own strengths unfortunately. That Americans don't travel, understand other culture enough (on the whole). This is a strength, a resilience and independence but when it comes to sending a boy from Iowa to Kirkut, it is disasterous......

DD

July 4th, 2006.

It is July 4th. As good a thread as any to write about America. As good at time as any to start a Blog. For any writing should be of free expression, even by default. My own is.

There, many label me at worst, anti - American leftist, at best, idealistic. I shall remain so though I am anything but anti- American. More to the point, real AMERICAN.

It is a day to remember when America let forth the myth for which she will always be remembered and forever the world in her debt..............the myth and hope and archetype of FREEDOM.

America shrugged off the yolk and deemed all men created equal, all men to live with the possibility of FREEDOM and being able to live unregulated, to fulfill their inner potential.

America as a land for the individual and rugged spirit. America as a land of the boisterous and the be damned. America as a land of experiment and a land where a man could make his own way, unencumbered by the past, by his bloodline or by his government.

This is the America that still is and rests moreso in the everyday man. It is the America of Walt Whitman. It is the America of Twain and Steinbeck. Of Miller and Mailer and Paine. It is the America that is still out there.......

When I think of all the friends I have in this world OR all the people I most value, the majority of them are American. God bless her. She is beautiful at her edges. She dances without preconceived step or regulation. She is........

July 4th. I think of those moments of dissent. I think of deTocqueville, I think of Springsteen and his always tone of being FREE in the arms of his lover, of being human, being honest about what is important in our lives, to lay in our loved ones arms....wherever, the tall grass, a house of glass, wherever....I think of Springsteen and an America of peace, of long grass, of tall beers and that generosity of spirit that is the envy of all peoples.

I've driven her length and talked to her marrow. Long hours with a horse trader in Erin , S.Carolina who offered me his house for a week, if only I'd talk to him another hour. The stock traders in Houston who just smiled and laughed with me and we were as one. The longshoreman in Chicago who bought me a hot dog and said , just because, cause he liked who I was. I talked to all those and I pay tribute to them. It is this common stock from where the soil will show her real nature. I believe.

Whitman evokes this common thread of Freedom, the freedom to do (and say, which is the most important form of doing). In his song of occupations. He sings.

Quote:
From Leaves of Grass, by Walt Whitman:

1
A song for occupations! In the labor of engines and trades and the labor of fields I find the developments,
And find the eternal meanings.

Workmen and Workwomen!
Were all educations practical and ornamental well display'd out of me, what would it amount to?
Were I as the head teacher, charitable proprietor, wise statesman, what would it amount to?
Were I to you as the boss employing and paying you, would that satisfy you?

The learn'd, virtuous, benevolent, and the usual terms,
A man like me and never the usual terms.

Neither a servant nor a master I,
I take no sooner a large price than a small price, I will have my own whoever enjoys me,
I will be even with you and you shall be even with me.

If you stand at work in a shop I stand as nigh as the nighest in the same shop,
If you bestow gifts on your brother or dearest friend I demand as good as your brother or dearest friend,
If your lover, husband, wife, is welcome by day or night, I must be personally as welcome,
If you become degraded, criminal, ill, then I become so for your sake,
If you remember your foolish and outlaw'd deeds, do you think I cannot remember my own foolish and outlaw'd deeds?
If you carouse at the table I carouse at the opposite side of the table,
If you meet some stranger in the streets and love him or her, why I often meet strangers in the street and love them.

Why what have you thought of yourself?
Is it you then that thought yourself less?
Is it you that thought the President greater than you?
Or the rich better off than you? or the educated wiser than you?

(Because you are greasy or pimpled, or were once drunk, or a thief,
Or that you are diseas'd, or rheumatic, or a prostitute,
Or from frivolity or impotence, or that you are no scholar and never saw your name in print, Do you give in that you are any less immortal?)

2

Souls of men and women! it is not you I call unseen, unheard, untouchable and untouching,
It is not you I go argue pro and con about, and to settle whether you are alive or no,
I own publicly who you are, if nobody else owns.

Grown, half-grown and babe, of this country and every country, indoors and out-doors, one just as much as the other, I see,
And all else behind or through them.

The wife, and she is not one jot less than the husband,
The daughter, and she is just as good as the son,
The mother, and she is every bit as much as the father.

Offspring of ignorant and poor, boys apprenticed to trades,
Young fellows working on farms and old fellows working on farms,
Sailor-men, merchant-men, coasters, immigrants,
All these I see, but nigher and farther the same I see,
None shall escape me and none shall wish to escape me.

I bring what you much need yet always have,
Not money, amours, dress, eating, erudition, but as good,
I send no agent or medium, offer no representative of value, but offer the value itself.

There is something that comes to one now and perpetually,
It is not what is printed, preach'd, discussed, it eludes discussion and print,
It is not to be put in a book, it is not in this book,
It is for you whoever you are, it is no farther from you than your hearing and sight are from you,
It is hinted by nearest, commonest, readiest, it is ever provoked by them.

You may read in many languages, yet read nothing about it,
You may read the President's message and read nothing about it there,
Nothing in the reports from the State department or Treasury department, or in the daily papers or weekly papers,
Or in the census or revenue returns, prices current, or any accounts of stock.



Back to Springsteen and his 69 Chevy with a 396 -- back to Freedom. God bless it and may no army, president, ceo or sycophant take it away......let's drive on a road to nowhere.....

DD

de tocqueville found at .. http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper/DETOC/toc_indx.html

This little snippet tells much and de tocqueville is one who understands the American character. America's birth cries can also be found in Paine, the Rights of Man http://www.ushistory.org/Paine/rights/ , a traitor and drunk..........so often the case of those who give birth to much.....

Quote:
I accost an American sailor and inquire why the ships of his country are built so as to last for only a short time, he answers without hesitation that the art of navigation is every day making such rapid progress that the finest vessel would become almost useless if it lasted beyond a few years. In these words, which fell accidentally, and on a particular subject, from an uninstructed man, I recognize the general and systematic idea upon which a great people direct all their concerns. Aristocratic nations are naturally too liable to narrow the scope of human perfectibility; democratic nations, to expand it beyond reason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adventurer wrote:
So, BJWD, what do you have to say about this one?



I'll give you one post, despite my rule of not posting while on vacation.

What do I have to say?

1) Religion is a mental disorder. To all of you. If you believe in god you are weak minded to the point of mental illness. Hindu, muslim, jew, christian, multiculturalist, all of you. Bat S.H.I.T. Crazy. If someone is talking to you in your head, you need to fix your head. Final answer.

2) What crazy religious types do in crazy religious nations is not my concern. Israel is included in this. I want crazy religious people kept out of Canada. We have enough of our own. I am just as in favour of keeping crazy religious jews out of Canada as I am crazy religious pakistanis.

3) I do not feel the need to be balanced. When this, and virtually every other site on earth focuses almost exclusively on the USA and the real and perceived crime thereof with scant reference to
i) the genocide(s) of Africa
ii) the cultural genocide of Tibet
iii) the human rights situation around the world
iv) Canadian crimes against aboriginal people (for Canadians who live in a BIG GLASS HOUSE and yet throw stones
v) forced abortions in China (where are you on that bb? Or, do only American women inspire you? Do women have to be white in order to gain your concern?)
vi) etc etc

I do not have to be "balanced". I think islam is philosophical pollution. In fact, I can prove it so. A 4 year old with a slightly sharp mind should be able to see the koran for the disgusting hate-filled garbage it is. It is total crap. islam is a fast spreading cancer and pretending it isn't, or that muslims don't actually believe their own religion, is just plain dumb.

But, i do not dislike the bizarre islam (not facing meccah while crapping? WTF) more than the others. I dislike the protection given to islam by idiots like bb and dd who are unable to look past the race (and customary victim status of that race) of the people who tend to hold it. These type of people are the real racists. They believe that racial "minorities" (every non-white is a minority to these people) are unable to handle criticism in the way that are whites. Racists. dd, you are a racist. I believe that they can. I believe that they ought to be held to the same intellectual and moral standard that are secular Westerners. Because they are equal is all ways but culture. And culture isn't their fault.
But I like that you girls obsess about me while I'm laying on a beach sipping booze out of a pineapple. That means I'm in your mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International