Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Grammatical explanation?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:12 pm    Post subject: Grammatical explanation? Reply with quote

"A new variation among American baseball players is to bump elbows with teammates, and american football players have taken to bumping their helments."

Why in the second clause of the sentence is it not 'to bump their...'?

I understand why it 'sounds' right, but how would you explain it to Koreans?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RACETRAITOR



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammatical explanation? Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
"A new variation among American baseball players is to bump elbows with teammates, and american football players have taken to bumping their helments."

Why in the second clause of the sentence is it not 'to bump their...'?

I understand why it 'sounds' right, but how would you explain it to Koreans?


Maybe just break it down into simpler sentences.

"A new variation among American baseball players is to bump elbows with teammates."
"American football players have taken to bumping their helmets."

It doesn't look weird to me at all. Plus, I fixed the spelling. Please tell me that wasn't your fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
CoDeReBeL



Joined: 04 May 2007

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any time you "take to" doing something, you take to doING it. You never, for instance, "take to drink beer," or "take to walk a lot." You "take to drinking beer," or you "take to walking a lot." You can UNDERtake to drink beer or undertake to walk a lot, but if it's just take you're gonna need the "ing" at the end of the verb. Don't ask me why. I didn't invent the language, and I'll be the first to admit that English is pretty much all fucked up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fat_Elvis



Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Location: In the ghetto

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My guess is it's a gerund phrase, because an action is the object of the clause. It's similar to start +ing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks - and sorry for posting this in the wrong forum. Feel free to move it, mods.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammatical explanation? Reply with quote

double post

Last edited by yawarakaijin on Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammatical explanation? Reply with quote

The way I see it is that "taken to" is a phrasal verb. While it is in fact a verb the prepostion part retains its...hmmmm prepositioness Wink and therefor needs to be followed by a noun. The phrasal verb in question needs an object and therefore a gerund is used in place of a proper noun.

Try it you will see. Some phrasal verbs, like some regular verbs require an object. In lieu of a proper noun the gerund is used. We all know gerunds can be nouns right? Wink

Phrasal verb. They put off go to the party. (X)
They put off going to the party. (correct)



This also throws many students into confusion as in most cases when you have a verb plus an infinitive it is generally understood that the infinitive happens after the main verb.

example: I want to go to the party. First you want then you go

Gerunds are typcially taken as having happened first.

example. I enjoyed watching the movie
First you watched the movie then you were able to say you enjoyed it.

Phrasal verbs throw this general rule of thumb into dissaray.

example I look forward to meeting you.

Obvioulsy you are "looking forward to" before you actually "meet". This messes up a lot of students. I just explain that the prepostion (particle) of the phrasal verb requires a noun to follow and therefore the gerund is used instead. You can easily illustrate to them how " I am looking forward to to meet you is incorrect.

So long answer short, hehe. Phrasal verbs need to be followed by the gerund. There's the rub. How do students know if its a regular verb followed by a prepostion or if the verb and preposition have come together to form a phrasal verb. That's another lesson. Wink[quote
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International