|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:38 am Post subject: Who treats the Indigenous PPL better: OZ, NZ, US, Canada |
|
|
Just curious. Are natives to your land treated well. Yes they have the reservations and casinos and some benefits, but I am curious which government they live best under: Canada or the US. Oh, I guess we can invite the Aussies to tell us about the Aborigines, or the Kiwis to report on the Maori.
Oh, if you are a Native American, Canadian, Kiwi or Aussie, would love to hear from you.
Also, how different or alike do you think these people groups are?
Based on the history books I have read, the US treated our proud indigenous people very badly |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
swetepete

Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: a limp little burg
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
The scene in Canada is pretty bad. Too painful and heavy to get into on a Friday. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: Central Areola
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would say that relations between New Zealand Europeans and Maori are pretty good. The country has a good feeling of unity and everyone appears to ride more or less as one nation.
Maori culture is integrated into the national curriculum, Te Reo Maori (language) is an official language of NZ. Maori culture is cherished and promoted.
There are still issues at large over fisheries and land rights in certain places but these are isolated. The Treaty of Waitangi (the document which acknowledged the Crown as guardians of New Zealand) will always be contentious due to historical discrepancies in the translation of key words but these days New Zealand is a harmonious multicultural nation.
Big ups New Zealand. Colonisation and assimilation is a precarious game, but in comparison to other countries, New Zealand has handled the unification of settlers and natives better and with more respect and tact than Australia and America in particular. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
The US probably has fewer issues with Natives than Canada these days, but historically there were a lot more conflicts, of course leading to more killing of Natives and driving them from their lands.
I used to date a girl who was half Native and seriously considered having kids with her because they'd get free tuition in university. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajgeddes

Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Location: Yongsan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I may be wrong, but I think in Canada it largely depends on whether or not they live on reserves. To be honest, I think natives living off of the reserves face little to no discrimination. I had plenty of friends that just lived amongst the people and they never complained or had any issues. The situation on the reserves though.... that's a whole different story. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I used to date a girl who was half Native and seriously considered having kids with her because they'd get free tuition in university. |
Great reason to have kids ...
I would say New Zealand leads the world in indiginous/colonial race relations. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:05 am Post subject: hmmmm |
|
|
Rapacious Mr. Batstove wrote: |
I would say that relations between New Zealand Europeans and Maori are pretty good. The country has a good feeling of unity and everyone appears to ride more or less as one nation.
Maori culture is integrated into the national curriculum, Te Reo Maori (language) is an official language of NZ. Maori culture is cherished and promoted.
There are still issues at large over fisheries and land rights in certain places but these are isolated. The Treaty of Waitangi (the document which acknowledged the Crown as guardians of New Zealand) will always be contentious due to historical discrepancies in the translation of key words but these days New Zealand is a harmonious multicultural nation.
Big ups New Zealand. Colonisation and assimilation is a precarious game, but in comparison to other countries, New Zealand has handled the unification of settlers and natives better and with more respect and tact than Australia and America in particular. |
I heard the same thing from Kiwi friends of mine. Also, in NZ Maoris are much more involved in the national sport-Look at the "All Blacks". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: Central Areola
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:52 am Post subject: Re: hmmmm |
|
|
Keepongoing wrote: |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove wrote: |
I would say that relations between New Zealand Europeans and Maori are pretty good. The country has a good feeling of unity and everyone appears to ride more or less as one nation.
Maori culture is integrated into the national curriculum, Te Reo Maori (language) is an official language of NZ. Maori culture is cherished and promoted.
There are still issues at large over fisheries and land rights in certain places but these are isolated. The Treaty of Waitangi (the document which acknowledged the Crown as guardians of New Zealand) will always be contentious due to historical discrepancies in the translation of key words but these days New Zealand is a harmonious multicultural nation.
Big ups New Zealand. Colonisation and assimilation is a precarious game, but in comparison to other countries, New Zealand has handled the unification of settlers and natives better and with more respect and tact than Australia and America in particular. |
I heard the same thing from Kiwi friends of mine. Also, in NZ Maoris are much more involved in the national sport-Look at the "All Blacks". |
Actually, it's comments like yours which help to marginalise minority groups, so be very careful what you say.
New Zealand Maori are not over-represented in Rugby, even at the top level. Maori are a naturally physical race of people, their culture has strong roots in dance and physical activity (Te Reo Kori). They have excelled in rugby, netball, softball, golf, and basketball. Maori and non native New Zealanders have a long history of using sport as a means of unification. We are at our strongest united together on a sports field.
The origin of the name 'All Blacks' relates to the first uniform worn by the team in which there we no native players. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
swetepete

Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: a limp little burg
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe I'll write something about the reservation system in Canada later, but I don't want to touch that one with a ten meter totem pole right now.
As for NZ exemplifying the successful integration of colonial and indigenous cultures, I have to say without a doubt it's the best case I've heard of so far. Far from perfect, still, but a damn sight better than what we've managed. I've met some bros here of Maori descent, living high on the hog with this sweet little gig we got; native Australians, zero. North Americans, zip.
There's a lot of superficial integration of aboriginal art where I'm from (west coast BC) and to a certain extent some cultural 'respect,' but by and large it remains just that: superficial. There's loads of token gestures, many of which are certainly heartfelt and well-intentioned, but the native and colonial populations don't get along well.
There's rampant racism, in the small cities where you'd expect to find it of course, but also in the bigger cities as well.
Native people are, in my experience, generally looked down on. Our jails are mostly filled with natives, as are our back-alleys and street shelters. The brave attempt by many to get off their reserves, and integrate with the city culture, results all too often with rejection and humiliation; and, frequently, with heavy boozing, and drugging, and worse.
Ours was the last point of the continent to get colonized. It's not been very long; maybe a hundred fifty years, tops. We're still dealing with some pretty heavy stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:07 am Post subject: Re: hmmmm |
|
|
Rapacious Mr. Batstove wrote: |
Keepongoing wrote: |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove wrote: |
I would say that relations between New Zealand Europeans and Maori are pretty good. The country has a good feeling of unity and everyone appears to ride more or less as one nation.
Maori culture is integrated into the national curriculum, Te Reo Maori (language) is an official language of NZ. Maori culture is cherished and promoted.
There are still issues at large over fisheries and land rights in certain places but these are isolated. The Treaty of Waitangi (the document which acknowledged the Crown as guardians of New Zealand) will always be contentious due to historical discrepancies in the translation of key words but these days New Zealand is a harmonious multicultural nation.
Big ups New Zealand. Colonisation and assimilation is a precarious game, but in comparison to other countries, New Zealand has handled the unification of settlers and natives better and with more respect and tact than Australia and America in particular. |
I heard the same thing from Kiwi friends of mine. Also, in NZ Maoris are much more involved in the national sport-Look at the "All Blacks". |
Actually, it's comments like yours which help to marginalise minority groups, so be very careful what you say.
New Zealand Maori are not over-represented in Rugby, even at the top level. Maori are a naturally physical race of people, their culture has strong roots in dance and physical activity (Te Reo Kori). They have excelled in rugby, netball, softball, golf, and basketball. Maori and non native New Zealanders have a long history of using sport as a means of unification. We are at our strongest united together on a sports field.
The origin of the name 'All Blacks' relates to the first uniform worn by the team in which there we no native players. |
huh, oh geeeeee, forgive me for my ignorance! I was NEVER suggesting anything racial and I know about the All Blacks , I use to watch them in the Hong Kong 7's. Can you point out specifically where I was marginalizing????????? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: Central Areola
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:02 am Post subject: Re: hmmmm |
|
|
Keepongoing wrote: |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove wrote: |
Keepongoing wrote: |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove wrote: |
I would say that relations between New Zealand Europeans and Maori are pretty good. The country has a good feeling of unity and everyone appears to ride more or less as one nation.
Maori culture is integrated into the national curriculum, Te Reo Maori (language) is an official language of NZ. Maori culture is cherished and promoted.
There are still issues at large over fisheries and land rights in certain places but these are isolated. The Treaty of Waitangi (the document which acknowledged the Crown as guardians of New Zealand) will always be contentious due to historical discrepancies in the translation of key words but these days New Zealand is a harmonious multicultural nation.
Big ups New Zealand. Colonisation and assimilation is a precarious game, but in comparison to other countries, New Zealand has handled the unification of settlers and natives better and with more respect and tact than Australia and America in particular. |
I heard the same thing from Kiwi friends of mine. Also, in NZ Maoris are much more involved in the national sport-Look at the "All Blacks". |
Actually, it's comments like yours which help to marginalise minority groups, so be very careful what you say.
New Zealand Maori are not over-represented in Rugby, even at the top level. Maori are a naturally physical race of people, their culture has strong roots in dance and physical activity (Te Reo Kori). They have excelled in rugby, netball, softball, golf, and basketball. Maori and non native New Zealanders have a long history of using sport as a means of unification. We are at our strongest united together on a sports field.
The origin of the name 'All Blacks' relates to the first uniform worn by the team in which there we no native players. |
huh, oh geeeeee, forgive me for my ignorance! I was NEVER suggesting anything racial and I know about the All Blacks , I use to watch them in the Hong Kong 7's. Can you point out specifically where I was marginalizing????????? |
That wasn't a rebuke. I'm not trying to come down hard on you, I know your comments weren't intended to offend in any way. I'm not pointing a finger, just highlighting a common misappropriation.
By 'help to marginalise' I mean your comment about native players being 'much more involved' in the national sport is heading in a direction where indigenous people are recognised only for their sporting ability. The same is said for African Americans in basketball, American football and track and field; Pacific Islanders for rugby, and Australian Aborigines in AFL, boxing and athletics.
The sports-field is one vehicle for indigenous peoples to gain acceptance and recognition, it has a double-edged sword somewhat. Traits such as physicality and aggression which are celebrated in the sporting arena are used to 'brand' and marginalise that whole indigenous group. Other important abilities such as academia and the arts are all too often overlooked. I guess rugby and the All Black franchise are the most predominant advertisement of Maoridom, and yes there are many Maori players in the team, BUT it doesn't equate to ethnic harmony in any way ir support evidence of positive race relations.
Oh yeah: The 'All Black's name is only used for the 15 a side game. If you 'knew' about this, you would know that on the IRB 7's circuit, the New Zealand teams is know as 'The New Zealand 7's team' not the All Blacks.
Last edited by Rapacious Mr. Batstove on Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Can you point out specifically where I was marginalizing????????? |
I'll take a stab at that.
It's great that Maoris are on a team. Do they also own land and farm it? Have small, medium and large businesses of various types? Are they equitably represented socially, economically, culturally in daily life? Maybe they are; I certainly don't know. What I do remember is that some group in the US was putting out a calendar with 'significant' birthdays listed. Almost all of the dates were coaches and athletes. Someone (Bill Cosby?) commented, asking if 'that' was all the black community had to celebrate.
Good point.
I have no idea how the other countries are now, but I am sure that none of us white folks have anything to be proud of in aboriginal/white relations historically. I prefer to blame the English, but that is neither here nor there.
In the US, the best thing to happen recently is casinos. They are not subject to state taxes. With wisdom and a lot of luck, the various tribes which have successful casinos will be able to turn the cash flow into long-term programs of health care and education, and turn that base into a long-term platform into economic success. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:46 am Post subject: Re: hmmmm |
|
|
[quote="Rapacious Mr. Batstove"][quote="Keepongoing"][quote="Rapacious Mr. Batstove"][quote="Keepongoing"]
Rapacious Mr. Batstove wrote: |
Oh yeah: The 'All Black's name is only used for the 15 a side game. If you 'knew' about this, you would know that on the IRB 7's circuit, the New Zealand teams is know as 'The New Zealand 7's team' not the All Blacks. |
yes, but the Kiwi friends I was with only referred to them as the "All Blacks" and were wearing All Black Jerseys
I understand what you are saying about the marginalization-a good point |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Perfect Cup of Coffee

Joined: 17 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard about the NZ attempts to improve relations with the Maori, mostly from Kiwi co-workers of mine and the government policy seems genuine. Sadly, the same co-workers had nothing nice to say about Australia's government and its treatment of Aborigines. I suppose the greatest difference though between NZ / Australia and the US / Canada though is the sheer numbers of tribes the American and Canadian governments deal with on treaty negotiations and political rights.
How does it work in NZ and Australia? The way it's working in North America is slow and tedious as the feds must deal mostly with individual tribes. I don't even have any idea how many there are in North America either...hundreds? Maybe someone from NZ or Australia can answer the question? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
genezorm

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Location: Mokpo
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think its pretty safe to say the record is crap for all of them
except for australia who has wiped all of them out
the free tuition thing in canada is a joke
a friend of mine was denied it because some "board of advisors" were worried he wouldn't work hard enough |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|