View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
oldfatfarang
Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: On the road to somewhere.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:47 pm Post subject: 'Face' and Class Room Discipline |
|
|
I saw an interesting use of 'face' (and shame) in my class this week. One of my 3rd grade middle school classes has been getting pretty slack (they're starting to focus on their final tests and high schools/futures).
So, about 8 students didn't bring text books to class. The co-teacher made them go and get their books, and then - get this - she made them stand at the back of the room and cover their faces with their text books.
Everyone in the class was mortified and the offenders were, incredibly, 'shamed'.
This notion of 'face' is just bizare. Has anyone else seen 'covering the face' used as a classroom tool before? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pest2

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: Re: 'Face' and Class Room Discipline |
|
|
oldfatfarang wrote: |
I saw an interesting use of 'face' (and shame) in my class this week. One of my 3rd grade middle school classes has been getting pretty slack (they're starting to focus on their final tests and high schools/futures).
So, about 8 students didn't bring text books to class. The co-teacher made them go and get their books, and then - get this - she made them stand at the back of the room and cover their faces with their text books.
Everyone in the class was mortified and the offenders were, incredibly, 'shamed'.
This notion of 'face' is just bizare. Has anyone else seen 'covering the face' used as a classroom tool before? |
Hahaha, thats funny! I haven't seen covering the face as if in shame, literally, but the way the owner's wife used to punish the kids for not doing homework was basically the same idea. She'd line them up in front of the class, chew them out, make them hold out their hands, and whack them with a vacuum cleaner hose. She didnt have to hit them that hard to make them look as if they'd been sent to a gas chamber.
Face seems bizarre because its dependent on what most people believe rather than confirmation of the truth. The collective beliefs of the group -- regardless of the evidence for those beliefs and the truth -- trump all the knowledge of the individual... even in cases when the individual's experience and direct perception provide perfect knowledge of event A, a group's circumstantial evidenced-based belief in B makes B true for everyone -- including the individual.
It's perception over truth, outward-in over inward-out.
It also corresponds to a lower level of moral reasoning because determination of good is for pleasing others rather than the intrinsic value of good itself.
In Korea, it's also very important. For all the times someone on this website pointed out some irrational thing about Korea, I'd bet 90% of those times the culprit was the face issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldfatfarang
Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: On the road to somewhere.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent philosophical analysis of 'face'. I'm not sure about the owner's wife/homework example though - she was also using pain (and implied increased pain for future infrigements).
I just don't get 'face'. I've had my Thai lady rip me a new one because I was 'bad mannered to suggest dishonesty' when a Thai man asked five times the going rate for a ferry ride. Apparently, everyone lost face when I called him on it. She took me aside - away from everyone's 'face' - and really gave it to me. (My telling off was done in private to protect her and my face.)
Evidently, I should have just lied to avoid paying the inflated price, e.g., "I'm sorry, I've just remembered we have to do something else now". Then everyone's face would have been protected.
I just don't get 'face'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
korean culture is not built on a history of sin/redemption, so because there is no redemption, there should be no sin (or else everyone sins - the sharing of responsibility when blame is handed out, eg., car accidents)
no kuddos for the honesty of confession, no paying off of debts to society
egos get pretty fragile when there is no process of healing
and Koreans certainly have big and fragile egos |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have a problem with 'face' of the kind oldfatfarang described. Just, rather than call someone directly on their action, you let them know indirectly by your actions you won't be cheated, the price comes down and everybody wins! It's just avoiding unnecessary unpleasantness.
But I think what pest2 said, ("Face seems bizarre because its dependent on what most people believe rather than confirmation of the truth"), applies to status in that it's a collective construct. That's true no matter what culture you're from. However Koreans seem to stand out by pursuing status in its purest form, without regard to concomitant material or tangible benefit, enjoyment, inward satisfaction or anything else. They do it or they buy it because, if society says that's how you acquire status, then they have no choice. Why else would they spend night after night drinking themselves sick on cheap, nasty alcohol and paying huge amounts for the privilege? It's a way for the senior to prove they are, well, senior.
They don't know any other way to be. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pest2

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Privateer wrote: |
I don't have a problem with 'face' of the kind oldfatfarang described. Just, rather than call someone directly on their action, you let them know indirectly by your actions you won't be cheated, the price comes down and everybody wins! It's just avoiding unnecessary unpleasantness.
But I think what pest2 said, ("Face seems bizarre because its dependent on what most people believe rather than confirmation of the truth"), applies to status in that it's a collective construct. That's true no matter what culture you're from. However Koreans seem to stand out by pursuing status in its purest form, without regard to concomitant material or tangible benefit, enjoyment, inward satisfaction or anything else. They do it or they buy it because, if society says that's how you acquire status, then they have no choice. Why else would they spend night after night drinking themselves sick on cheap, nasty alcohol and paying huge amounts for the privilege? It's a way for the senior to prove they are, well, senior.
They don't know any other way to be. |
Yeah, they just do it 'because'.... that might be that shaman thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well sometimes, often, the fact that everyone else is doing something is more than sufficient reason for us to do it too. Like in Catch 22 when Yossarian says if everyone else ran away I'd be a damn fool to stay behind, wouldn't I?
Korea just seems to take that to an extreme. Or is that just cultural bias?
Don't see the connection with shamanism though? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I see similarities in "saving face" in the East and "Keeping pride" in the West. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: Central Areola
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pkang0202 wrote: |
I see similarities in "saving face" in the East and "Keeping pride" in the West. |
Saving face - Avoiding embarrassment at all costs, be it my own or someone I interact with.
Keeping pride (my take) - Maintaining integrity and dignity no matter what happens.
I don't see the similarities. Saving face provides that dishonest practices such as lying are an acceptable means of avoiding embarrassment. If I had to find a positive virtue to attach to 'saving face', compassion could fit that shoe well.
Keeping pride allows a person to remain true to their cause through positive virtues such as integrity thus maintaining either personal pride or pride in something important to them.
If your take on 'keeping pride' differs to mine, I'd love to know what similarities you see in 'keeping pride' and 'saving face'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pest2

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Privateer wrote: |
Don't see the connection with shamanism though? |
Well, among other things, shamanism holds that certain actions or behaviors bring about certain effects without the need for any understanding or reason.... Do a rain dance, later it rains. Why? No need to understand why. It just happens. We SHOULD do it.
We should pursue status. Not because it gives us benefit. Not because it makes our lives easier. Not because anything. We SHOULD. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldfatfarang
Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: On the road to somewhere.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: 'Face' and Class Room Discipline |
|
|
oldfatfarang wrote: |
I saw an interesting use of 'face' (and shame) in my class this week. One of my 3rd grade middle school classes has been getting pretty slack (they're starting to focus on their final tests and high schools/futures).
So, about 8 students didn't bring text books to class. The co-teacher made them go and get their books, and then - get this - she made them stand at the back of the room and cover their faces with their text books.
Everyone in the class was mortified and the offenders were, incredibly, 'shamed'.
This notion of 'face' is just bizare. Has anyone else seen 'covering the face' used as a classroom tool before? |
Yeah, all good stuff. But I should have made myself more clear. I'm really puzzled about why they had to cover up their faces.
Was it because - they'd been bad so:
(1) They didn't deserve to have a 'face' for 5 mins?
(2) They were being punished and so made to be non-persons (no-face)?
(3) Only people conforming to the group norms (good students) can show a (desired) face?
(4) The teacher just didn't want to look at them?
(5) The teacher didn't want to embarrass the good students by having them look at the 'faces' of the punished bad students?
(6) The teacher didn't want to really embarrass the bad students (and cause them a real loss of face) while they were being punished/scolded?
Western psychology probably doesn't explain this situation well. But I'd appreciated any ideas. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's a new one...Never witnessed or heard of it before until I read this thread.
The closest that I've seen is making kids stand in the corner but no one seemed more horrified than the kid getting punished. The other students just sat around and snickered. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:56 am Post subject: Re: 'Face' and Class Room Discipline |
|
|
oldfatfarang wrote: |
Yeah, all good stuff. But I should have made myself more clear. I'm really puzzled about why they had to cover up their faces.
Was it because - they'd been bad so:
(1) They didn't deserve to have a 'face' for 5 mins?
(2) They were being punished and so made to be non-persons (no-face)?
(3) Only people conforming to the group norms (good students) can show a (desired) face?
(4) The teacher just didn't want to look at them?
(5) The teacher didn't want to embarrass the good students by having them look at the 'faces' of the punished bad students?
(6) The teacher didn't want to really embarrass the bad students (and cause them a real loss of face) while they were being punished/scolded?
Western psychology probably doesn't explain this situation well. But I'd appreciated any ideas. Thanks. |
I don't see any great mystery about it. Hiding your face indicates shame and she wants them to feel ashamed. No need to write any new pyschology books (or start studying shamanism either).
I don't see any connection between 'saving face' and this particular situation you're describing either - other than simply that faces are involved. Like I said above, I see 'saving face' as merely avoiding where possible embarrassing and unpleasant confrontation. Could be there's more to it than that but not that I've seen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|