|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tob55
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:52 pm Post subject: Qualities of Good Teachers |
|
|
Check out the following article:
The Qualities of Good Teachers
It is an article that provides some insights regarding the personal qualities of good teachers, and what skills they bring to the classroom. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sody
Joined: 14 May 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
It is not the job of the teacher to create motivation, but it is their job to make positive influences to the motivation that already exists. Teachers should become a positive leaders which will lead to more highly motivated learners.
|
Hmm...I'll have to give this one some thought. Is it primarily the ESL industry where this is applicable? There would undoubtedly be some disagreement over this. The rest of the article is good but I'm not sure whether or not it is our job to create motivation. For now I will disagree with the quote and say it is our job. What do others think? Must we be responsible for creating motivation? If teachers are responsible for motivating students to learn other subjects, then why not ESL? Why or why not under the basis of ESL in Korea?
Sody |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tob55
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:37 am Post subject: Clarification... |
|
|
You are right Sody, the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation present does create a number of concerns... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jizzo T. Clown

Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Location: at my wit's end
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Teachers in Korea create "motivation" all the time--how many of you believe in candy and stickers, even for high school students? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Motivation means encouraging and providing incentive for students to study and learn, so yes, it's an essential part of any teacher's job.
Candy and stickers are not methods of motivation. They are bribes that create spoiled brats instead of good students. Korea is already full of spoiled children: too many Dudleys raised by too many Dursleys.
Unfortunately, too many parents and teachers do not know the difference between motivation and bribery. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jellypah

Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Location: ROK
|
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
Candy and stickers are not methods of motivation. They are bribes that create spoiled brats instead of good students. Korea is already full of spoiled children: too many Dudleys raised by too many Dursleys.
Unfortunately, too many parents and teachers do not know the difference between motivation and bribery. |
Unless one is motivated by candy and stickers. You say "bribe," I say "reward." A big fat bonus paycheck presented to the motivated sales rep whose performance shone above his fellow co-workers is just the adult version of a big fat lollipop. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tob55
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: Motivation... |
|
|
Does motivation for learning exist before the incentive to participate is given? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mack4289

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
So if candy and stickers aren't a legit form of motivation (which I disagree with), what is?
I don't know about the love of teaching part. Does anyone here actually love the work part of their job? I get some satisfaction out of doing it well and take it seriously but I definitely wouldn't say I love it. I'd say I like it enough. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sojourner1

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Location: Where meggi swim and 2 wheeled tractors go sput put chug alugg pug pug
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read the article and it does make sense that loving what you do is key to success. I love teaching when I get students to sit down, be quiet, and be actively interested in and speaking, but kids sure are mean and unruly allot which makes job satisfaction difficult at times. I think I would love teaching teens and adults, because they will sit down on their own, listen, have a broader vocabulary, and probably are high enough English level to engage in conversation in order to build rapport. I think business English would be a great gig, except the split shifts and it being a hagwon, so a company job during regular business hours would be the ideal situation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Donkey Beer

Joined: 20 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, candy and stickers only make students continue acting like babies. I have often seen them go to my Korean co-teacher, demand stuff, and actually get it! Food, money, and stickers- all for the asking.
Sure, they like you better but it's just like buying friends.
If students want to act up because I don't give them what they desire, it's going to be a long and miserable year for them. They may not learn English, but they're going to get a dose of what proper manners are in my class. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mack4289

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you give them candy and stickers for no reason or simply because they ask, then yeah that's a bribe and an ineffective one. But if you give or refuse to give them based on their behavior and performance in the classroom, that can encourage them to be better students. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sody
Joined: 14 May 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting thoughts so far.
I would have to say that clearly, motivation is our responsibility as teachers because in order to teach effectively any good teacher must be able to motivate students. By necessity of being a "good teacher," you have no choice but to motivate. You can't have one without the other.
We've all had classes where the students aren't receptive or classes in which a number of students question the purpose of our activities or assignments. In order to address these concerns we need to address the student's question of "Why should I do this?" Or "Why should I participate in this activity, it's boring and I don't like this."
In other subjects like math for instance, a good teacher will include motivation into the structure of the lesson plan. Some teachers use incentive plans, give free time to students who successfully complete their work or let students do preferred activities like reading or drawing.
If you think about this carefully, and I have, there is no incentive whatsoever to motivate students in Korea. Here is a list of reasons for why I think motivating students in Korea is fruitless:
1. There's no benefit to motivating students because being a bad teacher has no consequences at all. Even if I do a bad job as an ESL teacher in Korea and was forced to get another job, well there are hundreds out there for me to choose from. In Korea, supply will always be greater than demand.
2. If I put all this effort into motivating students what will it ultimately accomplish? Koreans only enjoy socializing together. They are socially inept and sometimes completely against the idea of socializing with foreigners. I can't begin to tell you how many Koreans I have met abroad who simply cannot socialize with other groups, even other Asians. They simply cannot get along with others for some strange reason. Their culture focuses too much on cell phones and video games.
3. The education system is detrimental to true learning and as such, whatever you motivate them to learn now will probably be forgotten as they grow older because there are so many forces and factors which work against your encouragement.
4. It doesn't benefit your country in anyway. Well I guess if you are from America/Canada like me then you will agree with this somewhat. Hell, I would even argue that teaching in hagwon is actually detrimental to Korea, but that's just my 10 won.
5. This is probably the most important point of them all. All of the effort and stress you put into motivating your students will be unappreciated by anyone except yourself and your students. Those of you who work at a hagwon know what I mean I'm 100% sure. It's even worse when you try and be a good teacher and the repressed and overworked students simply don't care. In Korea it's so easy to give up. That's part of the reason why programs like GEPIK are sh*t. No support. That's also why so many Korean teachers don't care either and have to resort to corporal punishment.
I'm biased, but after thinking about it for a long time the only reason I can come up with for motivating your students is this:
1. You care about them for who they are as people, you take pride in your work as a teacher and you really want to motivate them.
Is this enough though? For me it is because I have students that I love. It's not always easy but I do it for myself and for my students. I don't do it for my dumb ass principal, GEPIK, Korea or the parents.
As for candy/stickers, yes they are definitely incentives but I would have to disagree that they are legit. Certainly they are not legit in other countries. In Canada you might even get fired for giving a student candy, especially if that student had an allergic reaction to it.
Sody |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Using candy, toys, stickers, dessert etc as rewards for good behavior or their removal/denial as punishment for bad behavior is one of the things that psychiatrists teach parents in child rearing classes NOT to do. Perhaps they need some classes for teachers as well. It is this that creates the Dudley Dursleys of the world.
Many children (not only in Korea) are spoiled rotten by the use of candy, stickers etc. They become brats and do not make good students. You can buy temporary results, but you have to feed the addiction with ever increasing doses, which leads to an escalating cycle of need for such rewards: ie you create spoiled monsters.
The best motivation is love: the teacer loves his/her students sincerely, wants them to succeed to the highest possible level each can attain individually, encourages them to do so, admonishes bad behavior, and rewards good behavior with praise, encouragement and love. The goal is to encourage a love of learning and a desire to learn and succeed in the student that transcends the need for the temporary addictive reward of candy, stickers, money and other bribes.
The difference between bribes and motivation is that motivation can be aquired and internalized by the individual who becomes self-motivated. Bribes must constantly be renewed and increased and can be turned against the giver by the recipient into demands and extortion.
Sales commissions are not the same as the candy bribery problem if properly designed and constructed. They consitute payment for real services rendered and must be earned. The bribery of children is not payment for real service or work, but consitutes a bribe for actions or behavior that is not work but merely what the recipient should have done on his own accord. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mack4289

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
Using candy, toys, stickers, dessert etc as rewards for good behavior or their removal/denial as punishment for bad behavior is one of the things that psychiatrists teach parents in child rearing classes NOT to do. Perhaps they need some classes for teachers as well. It is this that creates the Dudley Dursleys of the world.
Many children (not only in Korea) are spoiled rotten by the use of candy, stickers etc. They become brats and do not make good students. You can buy temporary results, but you have to feed the addiction with ever increasing doses, which leads to an escalating cycle of need for such rewards: ie you create spoiled monsters.
The best motivation is love: the teacer loves his/her students sincerely, wants them to succeed to the highest possible level each can attain individually, encourages them to do so, admonishes bad behavior, and rewards good behavior with praise, encouragement and love. The goal is to encourage a love of learning and a desire to learn and succeed in the student that transcends the need for the temporary addictive reward of candy, stickers, money and other bribes.
The difference between bribes and motivation is that motivation can be aquired and internalized by the individual who becomes self-motivated. Bribes must constantly be renewed and increased and can be turned against the giver by the recipient into demands and extortion.
Sales commissions are not the same as the candy bribery problem if properly designed and constructed. They consitute payment for real services rendered and must be earned. The bribery of children is not payment for real service or work, but consitutes a bribe for actions or behavior that is not work but merely what the recipient should have done on his own accord. |
Do you have a source for your claim that psychiatrists say giving candy and stickers is detrimental to the kids? Also, how much does it matter what the psychiatrists say? What's your experience?
At my school (GnB) we give coupons to the kids as rewards. They redeem these coupons one day for GnB money, which they can use to buy things on our market day. I don't increase how much I give them and it seems to motivate the kids enough. I also have punishments which I give consistently to kids who misbehave.
Well I imagine my students appreciate my encouragement, I know they appreciate the coupons. I don't love the students or the job so I have no love to offer them and I'm not sure they want it anyway. They're nice enough kids and I wish them well but love them? Why should a teacher have to love their students?
Also, in the love as a reward system, how much love do you give to each group of students? For the really excellent students, do you give them a whole lotta love? For the very good students, do you just give them good lovin? Ok, sorry, but the love as a reward system sounds absurd.
Why is kids getting candy for classwork well done any different than salespeople getting a bonus for selling a lot of stuff? Why should we expect kids to do well of their own accord but not expect the same of adults? Shouldn't the expectations be lower for kids, considering they're not going to school to support themselves or anyone else (not directly and immediately) and considering no one's going to fire them from school? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
mack4289 wrote: |
Do you have a source for your claim that psychiatrists say giving candy and stickers is detrimental to the kids? Also, how much does it matter what the psychiatrists say? What's your experience? |
The most famous article on the failure of rewards to motivate is probably:
Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1976). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children's intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 479-486.
But there has been a lot of work done on the use of rewards beyond this. For a broad summary you can look in:
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Look up 'rewards' in the index.
The book is 20 years old, but work since then has largely confirmed the findings up to that point. For confirmation of this, see Deci's popularization of his work:
Deci, E. L (with R. Flaste) (1995). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York: Penguin.
Basically, the only kind of rewards which has been found NOT to have a negative effect on intrinsic motivation in the long run are 'task non-contingent' rewards - rewards given basically for showing up, without being influenced by how people act in the task. And these rewards are only effective if they are perceived by the recipients as 'non-controlling', that is, not directed at getting them to do the task.
All other reward types (task-contingent, competitive, etc.) have a negative long-term effect on intrinsic motivation. It works like this. If you give children (or anyone) a chocolate for doing an English activity, over time, the chocolate replaces English as the source of motivation. Without the reward available, the activity is not attractive and will not be participated in. (The title of the Lepper & Greene article refers to how this effect can destroy intrinsic motivation and make things that learners once did voluntarily into things they avoid.) The reward will work as an extrinsic motivator temporarily, but will require increase over time to produce the same effect, and eventually will fail. At some point, you can't reward people enough to do something they don't think is worthwhile. I would argue that this is part of why so many Korean kids come to hate English.
mack4289 wrote: |
At my school (GnB) we give coupons to the kids as rewards. They redeem these coupons one day for GnB money, which they can use to buy things on our market day. I don't increase how much I give them and it seems to motivate the kids enough. I also have punishments which I give consistently to kids who misbehave. |
Punishments will, again, temporarily bring about desired behaviors, but they do not build intrinsic motivation for learning. And, again, in the long run, punishment loses effectiveness even as an extrinsic motivator. At some point, you cannot punish people enough to make them do something they don't want to do.
mack4289 wrote: |
Well I imagine my students appreciate my encouragement, I know they appreciate the coupons. I don't love the students or the job so I have no love to offer them and I'm not sure they want it anyway. They're nice enough kids and I wish them well but love them? Why should a teacher have to love their students? |
Encouragement, especially if it is focused on effort, rather than outcome, is good for building positive forms of motvation. Other forms of autonomy supportive behaviors on the parts of teachers have been shown to be valuable as well, such as providing choice to learners and, most significantly, providing relevance - explanations justifying activities in terms of learning (See work by Assor, Kaplan, & Roth in the British Journal of Educational Psychology in this regard; I don't have the details here as I write this).
From a different theoretical perspective, work by Mihalyi Csikszentmilhalyi has suggested that providing learners with tasks that are likely to help them enter flow states will be motivating in the long term. Such activities are interesting, allow learners to focus their attention, have some control over the task, get immediate feedback on their progress in the task, are well matched to the learners' skill level, providing them with a challenging, but manageable task.
mack4289 wrote: |
Also, in the love as a reward system, how much love do you give to each group of students? For the really excellent students, do you give them a whole lotta love? For the very good students, do you just give them good lovin? Ok, sorry, but the love as a reward system sounds absurd. |
I think providing the things above might be considered a kind of love, but I don't think the choice of word is so much the issue. You could just as well call it 'respect'. Whatever it is, I would say it is has to be given equally and impartially to all students, as a quality of being a teacher.
A more important (and better defined) term would be 'autonomy support', as defined above. Providing that, again, may be called love, but it is least grounded in concrete actions.
mack4289 wrote: |
Why is kids getting candy for classwork well done any different than salespeople getting a bonus for selling a lot of stuff? Why should we expect kids to do well of their own accord but not expect the same of adults? Shouldn't the expectations be lower for kids, considering they're not going to school to support themselves or anyone else (not directly and immediately) and considering no one's going to fire them from school? |
Contingent reward systems for salespeople have been shown to fail in motivating them. For this reason, many companies have moved away from such systems to salary systems (which are non-contingent) for their staffs.
To give one example of how you might use a non-contingent reward system in yoru classes, consider this. You have students work in groups on some project. At the end, instead of rewarding only one group for doing the best job, find ways to recognize all groups for some aspect of accomplishment - most interesting project, most colorful, best match to critieria, etc.
I think we should have high expectations for students, along with an understanding that they are children, and thus have more limited capabilities in many ways than we have as adults. We have to set high goals for them, but at the same time, use our abilities to make the achievement of those goals manageable for them. That's our job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|