|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:03 pm Post subject: We don't want... |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Forget lily-livered liberalism, time to take stand and say we don't want Muslim immigrants |
| Quote: |
Forget lily-livered liberalism, time to take stand and say we don't want Muslim immigrants
The question is especially apposite, because we now know the consequences for every single European society which has admitted large numbers of Muslims: social alienation, religious antagonism and outright terrorism.
We know this. We all know it. And yet we continue to allow Muslim immigration. Why? What do we gain from it?
Well, up until two weeks ago you might have said, more doctors - for when Mary Harney declared that she was going to solve the impasse in the health service by bringing in medical graduates from around the world, we all accepted that doctors, no matter their religion, were dedicated to saving life.
That was then. We know otherwise now. Clearly the Hippocratic Oath doesn't have the universal power we once thought. Even Mengele, for all his evil, could maintain the fiction that his abominable experiments were of some medical use. But no one could possibly say that of the medical mass-murder plots in Britain, where the term WMD has taken on a new and grisly resonance for some Muslim doctors. Which ones? We don't know. Okay: so why take the risk?
Now, whenever I write about immigration, the response is a bristling silence, as the binary-weight of physical fear and PC-conformism successfully suppresses debate on Ireland's future. Occasionally, one hears a little bleat, "You're not being helpful" - ah yes, the lily-livered whinge of unprincipled liberalism.
Thus, the Dail has never debated the effects of Christian, European population-movement into Ireland, never mind the consequences of Islamic immigration. This is frivolousness to the point of delinquency, the hallmark of a society which has neither faith in its own values, nor a determination for them to endure. And a society which does not defend its core-certainties is sooner or later doomed. Much of Europe is so afflicted, and Britain is in an advanced stage of the disease.
Islamic norms are now tolerated, and informally enforced, across many British cities, where women routinely wear full face-veils. Of Britain's two million Muslims, over 300,000 believe suicide attacks in the West are justified, and 500,000 believe the 7/7 attacks in London two years ago were the work of British intelligence.
Some 600,000 do not even regard themselves as British, 37pc want sharia law in Britain, and one-quarter want to live in all-Muslim areas. Meanwhile, MI5 is close to being overwhelmed by the sheer scale of the domestic terrorist insurgency: 100 Islamicist suspects are already awaiting trial, and there are some 200 terrorist networks, with 1,700 members, now operating around the country.
"Immigrants are good for a society," goes the brainless parrot-cry of Irish dogmatic advocates. Sometimes, sometimes, but not always. In Britain, 16pc of Christians are economically inactive; the figure for Muslims is twice that, 31pc. Unemployment for Muslim women stands at 18pc, compared to 4pc for Jewish and Christian women.
In Luton, 44pc of school pupils are Muslim, though only 30pc of the population of the town are. Which means that Muslim families have 50pc more children than those of the indigenous population - in other words, within a couple of generations, the two groups in Luton will be swapping demographic places.
Better still, Dr Nazia Khanum, the "Chair" of the splendidly named Luton Multicultural Women's Coalition, (no, I didn't make it up: I just couldn't) has complained that in many village schools near Luton - in rustic Bedfordshire - both teachers and pupils were almost entirely white. What? White Christians? In England? How perfectly shocking.
And terrifyingly, there is no large-scale Islamic rejection of the murderous projects of their co-religionists in Britain; no mass-rallies of Muslims denouncing Islamicism; no call from within Muslim society for Muslims to join the army or police; and no unconditional and all-embracing campaign to extirpate murderous fundamentalism from within British Muslim society. Even "liberal" Muslims blame British foreign policy for Islamic terrorism in Britain, while remaining silent about the unspeakable Muslim-on-Muslim atrocities in Iraq.
These plumb depths that are unprecedented in any conflict. Take one recent example: Sunni terrorists exploded a bomb at a Shia girls' university near Baghdad as the students broke for lunch. A suicide car-bomber meanwhile watched which way the panic-stricken girls were fleeing from the blast, and then drove into the largest mass of them, detonated his bomb and killed over hundred of them.
Here was a very special jihad operation indeed, one in which the martyr personally took his 72 virgins with him to paradise, with another 30 to spare. What a thoughtful fellow. But not even the Nazis at their most depraved made a public virtue out of slaughtering teenage girls.
Enough. So what advantage do we derive from allowing Muslims into Ireland, rather than Buddhists, Sikhs, Hindus, Parsis, Jains or even Christians? What rational justification is there for enlarging our Islamic population? What is it? Go on, what is it? |
http://www.independent.ie
Excellent question.
What is the benefit? What is the justification? Why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I couldn't find this article on the site. Could you post the direct link to the article?
The Indo was always my favorite newspaper and it saddens me that they print this bollocks, if they did. This is just fear mongering pure and simple. I'm sure if you go back to english/american newspapers in the 19th century you'll hear the same crap about Irish immigrants sweeping into their countries and diluting their culture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But answer the question.
Why? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
But answer the question.
Why? |
I still can't find that article. Direct link please? I'd like to see who wrote it. I'm familiar with most of the columnists at the independent as I read it pretty much every day.
They should be allowed in because they are like every one else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I still can't find that article. Direct link please? I'd like to see who wrote it. I'm familiar with most of the columnists at the independent as I read it pretty much every day. |
Google it.
| Quote: |
| They should be allowed in because they are like every one else. |
Their idea can only be peaceful when it is dominant. This is very, very clear. All over the world, where islam isn't dominant, it is struggling to dominate. This isn't even up for discussion anymore.
So why? Why force our nations to deal with this? They have their states and we have ours.
islam is a political project.
There is no moral obligation to fill Western states with people who are inherently hostile to the modern project.
Last edited by thepeel on Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I still can't find that article. Direct link please? I'd like to see who wrote it. I'm familiar with most of the columnists at the independent as I read it pretty much every day. |
Google it.
| Quote: |
| They should be allowed in because they are like every one else. |
Their idea can only be peaceful when it is dominant. This is very, very clear. All over the world, where islam isn't dominant, it is struggling to dominate. This isn't even up for discussion anymore.
So why? Why force our nations to deal with this? They have their states and we have ours. |
LOL so it wasn't in the independent. Thought it looked a tad suspicious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
| BJWD wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I still can't find that article. Direct link please? I'd like to see who wrote it. I'm familiar with most of the columnists at the independent as I read it pretty much every day. |
Google it.
| Quote: |
| They should be allowed in because they are like every one else. |
Their idea can only be peaceful when it is dominant. This is very, very clear. All over the world, where islam isn't dominant, it is struggling to dominate. This isn't even up for discussion anymore.
So why? Why force our nations to deal with this? They have their states and we have ours. |
LOL so it wasn't in the independent. Thought it looked a tad suspicious. |
"lol". Cool, you're eight.
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/analysis/forget-lilylivered-liberalism-time-to-take-stand-and-say-we-dont-want-muslim-immigrants-1038583.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
| JMO wrote: |
| BJWD wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I still can't find that article. Direct link please? I'd like to see who wrote it. I'm familiar with most of the columnists at the independent as I read it pretty much every day. |
Google it.
| Quote: |
| They should be allowed in because they are like every one else. |
Their idea can only be peaceful when it is dominant. This is very, very clear. All over the world, where islam isn't dominant, it is struggling to dominate. This isn't even up for discussion anymore.
So why? Why force our nations to deal with this? They have their states and we have ours. |
LOL so it wasn't in the independent. Thought it looked a tad suspicious. |
"lol". Cool, your eight.
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/analysis/forget-lilylivered-liberalism-time-to-take-stand-and-say-we-dont-want-muslim-immigrants-1038583.html |
gee it was right at your fingertips and you would have me google it to confirm, with no headline on the article. It always amuses me that to get what you want with people like you, you only have to doubt them. Thanks for the link. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lets take a closer look at the article.
| Quote: |
Some 600,000 do not even regard themselves as British, 37pc want sharia law in Britain, and one-quarter want to live in all-Muslim areas. Meanwhile, MI5 is close to being overwhelmed by the sheer scale of the domestic terrorist insurgency: 100 Islamicist suspects are already awaiting trial, and there are some 200 terrorist networks, with 1,700 members, now operating around the country. |
You say they are "like everyone else". Kindly list how Hindu's, Jain's and Buddhists are like the above. Provide examples of how other minority groups are "like" the above.
Examples. Not platitudes.
| Quote: |
In Britain, 16pc of Christians are economically inactive; the figure for Muslims is twice that, 31pc. Unemployment for Muslim women stands at 18pc, compared to 4pc for Jewish and Christian women. |
Where is the benefit? Britain imports third world mo'lovers and then puts them on welfare.
Where is the benefit? Why do this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I fail to see how this is different from the Irish population in England in say the 80s. Alot of them think of themselves as Irish, many support bombing campaigns in England, they live in all Irish areas, IRA cells are everywhere(at least in the mind of newspaper hacks). Its fearmongering.
| Quote: |
| Of Britain's two million Muslims, over 300,000 believe suicide attacks in the West are justified |
I'm certain the same % of Irish people living in England furing the troubles would have supported IRA campaigns.
| Quote: |
| In Britain, 16pc of Christians are economically inactive; the figure for Muslims is twice that, 31pc |
This is ridiculous. He is cherry picking data to support his point and ignoring the myriad of reasons for these figures. Once again I'd like to find out the Irish immigrant unemployment rate in England in the 80s.
| Quote: |
. And terrifyingly, there is no large-scale Islamic rejection of the murderous projects of their co-religionists in Britain; no mass-rallies of Muslims denouncing Islamicism; no call from within Muslim society for Muslims to join the army or police; and no unconditional and all-embracing campaign to extirpate murderous fundamentalism from within British Muslim society. Even "liberal" Muslims blame British foreign policy for Islamic terrorism in Britain, while remaining silent about the unspeakable Muslim-on-Muslim atrocities in Iraq.
|
My god. Does this rebate know what country he is from. If you substitute Catholic/Irish for muslim here you get whatever retarded Daily Mail article in the 80s crying about the Irish threat. Actually lets do that.
And terrifyingly, there is no large-scale Irish rejection of the murderous projects of their co-religionists in Ireland and Britain; no mass-rallies of Irish denouncing Irish nationalism; no call from within Irish society for Irish/catholics to join the army or police; and no unconditional and all-embracing campaign to extirpate murderous fundamentalism from within Irish catholic society. Even "liberal" Irish blame British foreign policy for Irish terrorism in Britain, while remaining silent about the unspeakable Irish on Irish atrocities in Northern Ireland.
Well ok the last sentence is a stretch but you get my point.
What really gets me about the whole thing is these passages.
| Quote: |
| In Luton, 44pc of school pupils are Muslim, though only 30pc of the population of the town are. Which means that Muslim families have 50pc more children than those of the indigenous population - in other words, within a couple of generations, the two groups in Luton will be swapping demographic places. |
Whats wrong with this? These people are British too, why can't they live in this area.
| Quote: |
| These plumb depths that are unprecedented in any conflict. Take one recent example: Sunni terrorists exploded a bomb at a Shia girls' university near Baghdad as the students broke for lunch. A suicide car-bomber meanwhile watched which way the panic-stricken girls were fleeing from the blast, and then drove into the largest mass of them, detonated his bomb and killed over hundred of them. |
What has this got to do with the muslim population in Britain. In other news circa 1980, an IRA car bomb went off in Belfast tonight in the protestant working class Shankill area killing 5 people.
How does this relate to the Irish catholic community in England, in the eyes of anyone but a bigot?
Thats exactly what Kevin Myers is, a bigot. Islamic people should not be barred from entering our country because some of them are terrorist and some of them support terrorists. You cannot paint an entire people on the actions of a minority. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I fail to see how this is different from the Irish population in England in say the 80s. Alot of them think of themselves as Irish, many support bombing campaigns in England, they live in all Irish areas, IRA cells are everywhere(at least in the mind of newspaper hacks). Its fearmongering. |
Evidence? Or, proof by assertion?
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| Of Britain's two million Muslims, over 300,000 believe suicide attacks in the West are justified |
I'm certain the same % of Irish people living in England furing the troubles would have supported IRA campaigns. |
Evidence? Or, proof by assertion?
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
| In Britain, 16pc of Christians are economically inactive; the figure for Muslims is twice that, 31pc |
This is ridiculous. He is cherry picking data to support his point and ignoring the myriad of reasons for these figures. Once again I'd like to find out the Irish immigrant unemployment rate in England in the 80s. |
Evidence? Or, proof by assertion?
For the one above, you really do need evidence. You can't just say "not it isn't" when facing stats you don't like. Counter it.
| Quote: |
| Quote: |
. And terrifyingly, there is no large-scale Islamic rejection of the murderous projects of their co-religionists in Britain; no mass-rallies of Muslims denouncing Islamicism; no call from within Muslim society for Muslims to join the army or police; and no unconditional and all-embracing campaign to extirpate murderous fundamentalism from within British Muslim society. Even "liberal" Muslims blame British foreign policy for Islamic terrorism in Britain, while remaining silent about the unspeakable Muslim-on-Muslim atrocities in Iraq.
|
My god. Does this rebate know what country he is from. If you substitute Catholic/Irish for muslim here you get whatever retarded Daily Mail article in the 80s crying about the Irish threat. Actually lets do that.
And terrifyingly, there is no large-scale Irish rejection of the murderous projects of their co-religionists in Ireland and Britain; no mass-rallies of Irish denouncing Irish nationalism; no call from within Irish society for Irish/catholics to join the army or police; and no unconditional and all-embracing campaign to extirpate murderous fundamentalism from within Irish catholic society. Even "liberal" Irish blame British foreign policy for Irish terrorism in Britain, while remaining silent about the unspeakable Irish on Irish atrocities in Northern Ireland.
Well ok the last sentence is a stretch but you get my point. |
No, I don't. Provide evidence.
Providing a comparison doesn't cut it. Provide evidence.
| Quote: |
What really gets me about the whole thing is these passages.
In Luton, 44pc of school pupils are Muslim, though only 30pc of the population of the town are. Which means that Muslim families have 50pc more children than those of the indigenous population - in other words, within a couple of generations, the two groups in Luton will be swapping demographic places. |
| Quote: |
Whats wrong with this? These people are British too, why can't they live in this area.
|
If you drop pakistan in Ireland will nothing change? If you switch the dominant culture of a nation, will the nation itself not change as well?
All the battles for gender equality over and done due to muslim immigration. The battles for gay rights, over and done due to muslim immigration. The battles for a productive economy over and done due to muslim immigration. The welfare state you Europeans love so dearly, gone, due to muslim immigration.
Be very careful here. It might be that the liberal project will be undone from the inside. Will a majority muslim Europe permit gay marriage? Think long and hard about that. Search for evidence.
Should you not concern yourself with the future culture of your country? How will homosexuals fare under your brave new (in)tolerant future?
| Quote: |
How does this relate to the Irish catholic community in England, in the eyes of anyone but a bigot? |
Ahh, there it is. The desperate platitude. Good for you. It took you almost 5 posts to get to it.
| Quote: |
| Thats exactly what Kevin Myers is, a bigot. |
A twofor!
| Quote: |
| Islamic people should not be barred from entering our country because some of them are terrorist and some of them support terrorists. You cannot paint an entire people on the actions of a minority. |
This has very little to do with terrorism. The prevention of muslim immigration is to protect European culture. A European culture that is unwilling to defend itself and a mulsim culture that is willing and eager to assert itself.
How many should the West let it? 50 million? 100 million? A billoin? How far are you willing to take this? Would you allow your hometown to become a majority muslim overnight?
Are you sure it is a minority? What if it is 49% that want to kill all the kuffar? Can we then? How about 30%
What if most of the young people are muslim and the old people not? Who will call the shots then?
I think you need to think about this a tad more. Get thee to the library and buy some books about islamic expansionism. Read the koran and hadiths. Learn about the things they value. Learn about what their kids learn in madrassa in your home cities. Seriously ask yourself if you want this mind-filth in your country. Haven't you had enough of religious conflict without adding the most violent religion, today, to the mix? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
If you drop pakistan in Ireland will nothing change? If you switch the dominant culture of a nation, will the nation itself not change as well?
|
Ireland can't stay the same for ever. Muslim immigration will not turn Ireland into Pakistan. Which country has adopted pakistani laws and customs as well as their flag I suppose? Provide evidence and proof of assertion. LOL
| Quote: |
| All the battles for gender equality over and done due to muslim immigration. The battles for gay rights, over and done due to muslim immigration. The battles for a productive economy over and done due to muslim immigration. The welfare state you Europeans love so dearly, gone, due to muslim immigration. |
Where has this happened?
| Quote: |
Be very careful here. It might be that the liberal project will be undone from the inside. Will a majority muslim Europe permit gay marriage? Think long and hard about that. Search for evidence.
|
Who said majority? One town in England does not mean there is a majority muslim population in England or there will be one in Ireland.
| Quote: |
| Of Britain's two million Muslims |
There are over 60 million people in Britain. Where is the majority muslim population?
This guy is advocating banning muslim immigration into Ireland or at least implying it. I'm not saying let everybody in, but I don't see a good reason for stopping one group whilst allowing others.
| Quote: |
| How many should the West let it? 50 million? 100 million? A billoin? How far are you willing to take this? Would you allow your hometown to become a majority muslim overnight? |
Fearmongering. Christ if we took a billion there would scarcely be any left in Pakistan and other muslim countries. I could move over there. Is there any nice beaches? I hear the weather is quite nice.
| Quote: |
| What if most of the young people are muslim and the old people not? Who will call the shots then? |
What if God was one of us? Just a Slob like one of us?
| Quote: |
| I think you need to think about this a tad more. Get thee to the library and buy some books about islamic expansionism. Read the koran and hadiths. Learn about the things they value. Learn about what their kids learn in madrassa in your home cities. Seriously ask yourself if you want this mind-filth in your country. Haven't you had enough of religious conflict without adding the most violent religion, today, to the mix? |
I say let them in. I don't need to go the library. We don't need to let in millions, but we can't ban them because that would be bigotry. Advocating a ban on immigration for one people is bigotry whether you like it or not.
How do you find newspaper articles from the 80s btw? It might be interesting to have a look back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dmbfan

Joined: 09 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I say let them in. I don't need to go the library. We don't need to let in millions, but we can't ban them because that would be bigotry. Advocating a ban on immigration for one people is bigotry whether you like it or not. |
Well, if the shoe fits.........
dmbfan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="JMO"]
| Quote: |
I say let them in. I don't need to go the library. We don't need to let in millions, but we can't ban them because that would be bigotry. Advocating a ban on immigration for one people is bigotry whether you like it or not.
|
Did you read what BJWD was writing? I don't think he is a bigot. He just sees the writing on the wall.
I think what he is saying is that while people of your ilk are tripping all over each other to be first in line to accommodate these new residents, there is a SIGNIFICANT percentage of them who most certainly would not do the same for you.
This observation isn't racist. Islam isn't a race. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have time right now to go point-by-point. But for a picture of what the UK is 10 years away from, read this:
| Quote: |
I still get questions as to why I, being Norwegian, write more about Sweden than I do about my own country. First of all: I do write about Norway sometimes. And second of all: If you look at capital cities alone, Oslo could quite possibly be the worst city in Scandinavia. However, in virtually all other respects, Sweden is worse. And yes, it is every bit as bad as I say it is.
The primary reason why I write so much about Sweden is because it is the most totalitarian country in the Western world, and should thus serve as a warning to others. The second reason is that Sweden, like my own country, now needs some "tough love." Too many Swedes still cling on to the myth of the "Swedish model" while their country is disintegrating underneath their feet. If Sweden the nation is to be saved � if it still can be saved, I'm not so sure � then Sweden the ideological beacon for mankind must be smashed, because vanity now blocks sanity.
According to news site The Local, a judge who hears migration appeals had his house vandalized by left-wing extremists. Threats were sprayed on the walls, red paint was poured over the steps and an axe was left outside his home. "When a judge in a Swedish court has his home vandalised in this way, it is of course very serious," said Ingvar Paulsson, head of the Gothenburg District Administrative Court . The group Antifascistisk Action (AFA) writes on its homepage that the attack was motivated by the situation of Iraqi asylum seekers. The Swedish Board of Migration has ruled that they should be deported if they cannot show that a threat exists against them personally.
It should be noted here that Sweden alone in 2006 accepted almost as many asylum applications from Iraqis as all other European countries did combined. Native Swedes, who live in a country that was one of the most ethnically homogeneous nations in the world only 30 years ago, will be a minority in their own country within a few decades, if current trends continue. Sweden is self-destructing at a pace that is probably unprecedented in history, but for the extreme Left, even this isn't fast enough.
AFA openly brag about numerous attacks against persons who get their full name and address published on their website. According to them, this is done in order to fight against capitalist exploitation and for a global, classless society. Their logic goes something like this: If you protest against Muslim immigration, you suffer from Islamophobia, which is almost the same as xenophobia, which is almost the same as racism. And racists are almost Fascists and Nazis, as we all know, and they shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions in public. Hence, if you protest against being assaulted or raped by Muslims, you are evil and need to be silenced. If a native Swede is really lucky, he or she will thus first get mugged or battered by Muslims, and then beaten up a second time by his own extreme Leftists for objecting to being beaten the first time. The state does next to nothing to prevent either, of course. Native Swedes who object to a mass immigration that will render them a minority in their own country within a couple of generations have already been classified as "racists," and racists are for all practical purposes outside of the protection of the law.
According to some observers, Islamophobic hatred is on the rise in Europe. Let's have a look at what constitutes "racist hatred." The following is used as an official example of what is considered an Islamophobic hate crime in Sweden: A Muslim family in a Swedish neighborhood asks whether it is possible for them to get something else to eat other than sausages made out of pork. Linda then answers: "No, we live in Sweden." The family asks what she means by that. Linda repeats that "We live in Sweden, and you have to respect that." The man of the family says that "We respect you, why can't you respect us?" Linda then replies that "No, unfortunately not." She laughs and walks away.
Contrast this with an example from 2006, when Chancellor of Justice G�ran Lambertz discontinued his preliminary investigation regarding anti-Semitism at the great mosque in Stockholm. He wrote that "the lecture at hand contains statements that are strongly degrading to Jews, among other things, they are throughout called brothers of apes and pigs." Furthermore a curse is expressed over the Jews and "Jihad is called for, to kill the Jews, whereby suicide bombers � celebrated as martyrs � are the most effective weapon." Lambertz thought that the "recently mentioned statements in spite of their contents are not to be considered incitement against an ethnic group according to Swedish law." His conclusions were that the preliminary investigation should be discontinued because this incitement against Jews could be said to originate from the Middle East conflict.
This double standard is not just limited to Jews. Dahn Pettersson, a local politician, has been fined 18,000 kronor for writing that 95 percent of all heroin brought in comes via Albanians from Kosovo. "It is never ethnic groups that commit crimes. It is individuals or groups of individuals," prosecutor Mats Svensson told the court, which found Pettersson guilty of "Agitation Against a Minority Group." Svante Nycander, former editor of daily Dagens Nyheter, stated that "the ruling in Malm� District Court is damaging to freedom of expression. Many will take it as proof that the authorities are afraid of uncomfortable truths, and that lacking reasoned counter-arguments they punish those who speak plainly." In Sweden, saying that Muslim Albanians are behind much of the drug traffic in Europe (a fact) is a crime. Making derogatory statements about the native population, however, is just fine.
Bexhet Kelmeni is of Kosovar Albanian origin and lives in Malm�, the country's third largest city, which is set to become the first Scandinavian city with a Muslim majority in a few years. He thinks that it is important that it has now been established that Dahn Pettersson's assertions were criminal. "I am ashamed that there are such politicians," says Kelmeni, who claims that he has been in contact with hundreds of Albanians and all of them have taken offense. "He needs to learn more about the Albanian culture," Kelmeni says. What he doesn't say is that many of the remaining Swedes in Malm� � the natives have been evacuating, or rather fleeing, the city for years due to rampant violence and harassment � get daily lessons in Albanian culture.
Feriz and Pajtim, members of Gangsta Albanian Thug Unit in Malm�, explain how they mug people downtown. They target a lone victim. "We surround him and beat and kick him until he no longer fights back," Feriz says. They are always many more people than their victims. Isn't this cowardly? "I have heard that from many, but I disagree. The whole point is that they're not supposed to have a chance." They don't express any sympathy for their victims. "If they get injured, they just have themselves to blame for being weak," says Pajtim and shrugs. "Many of us took part in gangs which fought against the Serbs in Kosovo. We have violence in our blood." They blame the politicians for why they are mugging, stating that they are bored. If the state could provide them with something to do, maybe they would stop attacking people. But is the lack of leisure pursuits the only reason why they assault people? "No, it's good fun as well," says Feriz.
Criminal gangs of Albanians thus freely admit assaulting Swedes, but Swedes cannot suggest that there are criminal gangs of Albanians. That's just racist.
The wave of robberies the city of Malm� is experiencing is part of a "war against the Swedes." This is the explanation given by young robbers from immigrant backgrounds. "When we are in the city and robbing we are waging a war, waging a war against the Swedes." This argument was repeated several times. "Power for me means that the Swedes shall look at me, lie down on the ground and kiss my feet. We rob every single day, as often as we want to, whenever we want to." Swedish authorities have done virtually nothing to stop this.
Is there then no racism in Malm�? Yes, there are some nasty cases of Islamophobia. A bus driver was suspended for discrimination and hatred after he allegedly tried to stop a woman from boarding because she was wearing a burka. According to writer Mats Wahl, arson against schools costs more than 300 million kroner a year. An unofficial survey among 52 Swedish municipalities indicated that at least 114 such cases of arson were registered within the first half of 2006, but accurate numbers were hard to come by. At least 139 schools suffered attempted arson during 2002 alone. Bj�rn Vinberg from the fire department in the Malm� area says it is degrading to put out fires again and again in the same immigrant areas, with school kids laughing at them and lighting a new one just afterwards. No doubt, this must be a protest against the institutionalized and pervasive Islamophobia in Swedish society.
In a country where the tax rate is above 60%, higher than in almost any other country on the planet save perhaps North Korea � which incidentally also has almost as much free speech as Sweden � the natives are attacked on a daily basis by immigrant gangs, yet the state seems unwilling to do anything to stop this. Although Muslims openly brag about targeting Jews and Christians, this doesn't constitute a hate crime. But is does constitute racism and a hate crime if Muslims are not presented with halal sausages at all times or allowed to wear a burka wherever they want to.
According to Professor Wilhelm Agrell, Sweden now has a security policy based on the assumption that territorial defense is no longer needed. Military resources are only deemed relevant as political markers in distant conflicts and their own territory has become nothing more than a training ground. Agrell concludes that "after years of existential angst and budgetary black holes, Sweden's military has finally taken down its flag, emptied its stores and fled the field." The few soldiers they do have are in places such as Afghanistan, not at home. Jan Karlsen from the Swedish Police Union warned in 2007 that the underfunded police force would not be able to keep up with organized crime and ethnic tensions for much longer. Meanwhile, police officers are protesting against a new uniform designed to make them appear less aggressive by replacing boots with shoes, making guns less visible and changing the shirts to a softer, gentler color.
In an article from June 2007 with the title "Summertime � rape time," Aftonbladet, the largest daily in Scandinavia, linked the spike in rapes during the summer to the warm weather. The official number of rape charges in Sweden has more than quadrupled during one generation, even more for girls under the age of 15. If this is due to the warm weather, I suppose the Scandinavian rape wave is caused by global warming? The fact that many of the suspects have a Muslim background, which is also proven by statistics from neighboring Norway, is purely coincidental, no doubt. The number of rapes in the Norwegian capital Oslo is now six times as high per capita as in New York.
According to journalist Karen Jespersen, Helle Klein, the political editor-in-chief of Aftonbladet from 2001 to 2007 and a former leading member of the Social Democratic Youth League, has stated that "If the debate is [about] that there are problems caused by refugees and immigrants, we don't want it." Opinion polls have revealed that two out of three Swedes doubt whether Islam can be combined with Swedish society, yet not one party represented in parliament has been genuinely critical of the immigration policies, and there is virtually no real debate about Multiculturalism and Islam.
During a demonstration in Stockholm organized by Islamic and anti-racist organizations in 2006, Helle Klein stood in front of a banner which read "A Sweden for all � Stop the Nazi violence" holding a speech warning against Islamophobia in the media. "Sweden for all" sounds almost exactly like "Sweden for Allah" in Swedish. When leading members of the political and media elites associate Islamophobia with Nazism while remaining silent on the violence committed by Muslim gangs in their own country, they are indirectly providing verbal ammunition to extreme Leftists groups such as AntiFascistisk Aktion, who physically assault critics of mass immigration.
The Brotherhood, an organization of Christian Social Democrats, has friendly relations with the Muslim Brotherhood, just as Klein's Swedish Social Democratic Party had with the Fascist and Nazi regimes prior to WW2. Helle Klein has voiced sympathy for terrorist organization Hamas, the Palestinian branch of the MB, in her editorials, while warning against the threat to world peace posed by Israeli aggression and the Christian Zionist Right in the USA. Hamas is a Fascist organization openly calling for mass murder of Jews. The irony of warning against "Nazi violence" while showing sympathy for an organization that wants to finish what the Nazis started apparently doesn't strike Ms. Klein, who is now studying to become a priest in the Church of Sweden. Her great-grandfather was a rabbi.
The Church of Sweden has announced its willingness to allow gay couples to marry in church, but would like marriage laws to be renamed "cohabitation laws." How Klein intends to reconcile support for gay marriage with support for an Islamic terrorist organization that wants to kill gays beats me, but I'm sure she'll think of something.
The British author Paul Weston believes that Britain's national heart has ceased beating: "Our national soul is hovering indecisively above the operating table. The crash team have been called, but the politically inclined hospital switchboard have told them there is no problem, that everything is under control. The life support boys have heard otherwise, they are hurrying to get there, but other hospital staff members have switched the signage to the operating theatre and killed the lights. It is a big hospital, they only have minutes to get there, they are lost, confused, misinformed, and the clock is relentlessly ticking, and ticking, and ticking�"
I'm inclined to say the same thing about Sweden. The Swedish nation is currently on its deathbed. We can only hope there is life after death after all. |
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2278 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|