View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Morton
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:05 am Post subject: Past tenses |
|
|
Can anyone explain to me the different forms we use to to express the future? Or any good website that might be able to provide some light? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jay-shi

Joined: 09 May 2004 Location: On tour
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:14 am Post subject: Re: Past tenses |
|
|
Morton wrote: |
Can anyone explain to me the different forms we use to to express the future? Or any good website that might be able to provide some light? |
Your thread title is a little misleading..... Past tenses for a discussion of forms to express the future?
This link should cover all you bases if it's future tenses, and their usage, you want to know about :
http://www.english-the-easy-way.com/Future_Tense/Future_Tenses.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
artyom
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hellsmk2
Joined: 04 Jul 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Morton
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for all the responses. I feel this is an example of where Dave's really kicks ass.
And to the person who highlighted the incorrect title, i apologise. I made a mistake.
Once again, many thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shouldn't the term be verb forms? After all, English only has the past tense and the non-past tense. All the other things indicating future, etc., are modals, not tenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
meangradin

Joined: 10 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Different grammarains have different views on this, so for you to say that there ARE only 2 tenses is silly; although Woland does agree with you. Hell, I have a book that argues for "future in the past" as a tense. While another book maintains there are 6 tenses and three "tones: simple, progressive and emphatic" In my mind, a tense describes the time in which the verb takes place, so there must be at least be three tenses, but hey, I am no expert. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
meangradin wrote: |
Different grammarains have different views on this, so for you to say that there ARE only 2 tenses is silly; although Woland does agree with you. Hell, I have a book that argues for "future in the past" as a tense. While another book maintains there are 6 tenses and three "tones: simple, progressive and emphatic" In my mind, a tense describes the time in which the verb takes place, so there must be at least be three tenses, but hey, I am no expert. |
Silly? I think I'll go with what my Linguistics profs at university taught. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
icnelly
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Location: Bucheon
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
meangradin wrote: |
Different grammarains have different views on this, so for you to say that there ARE only 2 tenses is silly; although Woland does agree with you. Hell, I have a book that argues for "future in the past" as a tense. While another book maintains there are 6 tenses and three "tones: simple, progressive and emphatic" In my mind, a tense describes the time in which the verb takes place, so there must be at least be three tenses, but hey, I am no expert. |
I like Centralcali's distinction of past and non-past instead of past and present. Do the infinitive and present tense forms of verbs mark a specific time without modifiers?
I learned this: 2 tenses put together with aspect and mood will yield you verb phrases/forms that are commonly considered tenses: Tense, Mood, Aspect. 2 tenses, 4 moods, 2 aspects.
But as meangradin said, different grammarians have different views, and one of the books I have differs from what I just explained...
Meangradin, can you explain the 6 tenses and 3 tones model a little more; I'm interested. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|