Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Dick Cheney '94: Invading Baghdad Would Create Quagmire
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Alias



Joined: 24 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:39 pm    Post subject: Dick Cheney '94: Invading Baghdad Would Create Quagmire Reply with quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I Laughing

Irony.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChimpumCallao



Joined: 17 May 2005
Location: your mom

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, but to quote Boing Boing, "This was before 9-11 when Saddam Hussein personally flew two airlines into the Twin Towers"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not ironic. Lot of different variables to consider.

9/11 and other terrorist attacks and events, beginning, if memory serves, just a year or so after Cheney spoke here.

Differences in competency and cabinet-level leadership between H.W. Bush and W. Bush as well re: Middle-East policy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keane



Joined: 09 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Not ironic. Lot of different variables to consider.

9/11 and other terrorist attacks and events, beginning, if memory serves, just a year or so after Cheney spoke here.


You include 9/11 as if it were relevant. There is nothing anywhere that gives any credence to the idea that 9/11 and Iraq were related. I know you will claim they acted with honor and truth and the American flag draped around them; that their cause was noble and they really, truly believed what they were doing before they clicked their heels on their ruby-red shoes, but that is so much debunked pig squat, so save your breath.

The quote is from 1994 or so. FYI.

Quote:
Differences in competency and cabinet-level leadership between H.W. Bush and W. Bush as well re: Middle-East policy.


Very true. But I jest! The people in the current administration have, in fact, done their jobs quite well, with the exception of the execution of the war. Getting into it? A+. Creating a fearful and timid congress? Off the scale. Creating a fearful and timid people? Formerly off the scale, now about a B+. Rigging the electoral process? Off the scale. Draining the coffers of the country and the middle class into the pockets of the wealthy? Off the scale. Getting hold of the Iraqi Oil? Incomplete.

Let us get back to Cheney more directly. Iraq, by the description given in that video, backed by the reality since invasion, was going to be a quagmire. Since we know, and they knew, Iraq had no relationship to terrorism or 9/11, and it was going to be a quagmire by Dick's very own assessment, why in the name of all that is, ever was and will be did they go in there?

Answer me this, friend. And do so with neither the spin nor an apologist's extreme twists of logic and truth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
just another day



Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Location: Living with the Alaskan Inuits!!

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i don't get it.

his daughter is lesbian, he was against the invasion of iraq, and had many reasons for it that came true.

maybe he's just quiet nowadays because he's a puppet??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

keane wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Not ironic. Lot of different variables to consider.

9/11 and other terrorist attacks and events, beginning, if memory serves, just a year or so after Cheney spoke here.


You include 9/11 as if it were relevant. There is nothing anywhere that gives any credence to the idea that 9/11 and Iraq were related. I know you will claim they acted with honor and truth and the American flag draped around them; that their cause was noble and they really, truly believed what they were doing before they clicked their heels on their ruby-red shoes, but that is so much debunked pig squat, so save your breath.

The quote is from 1994 or so. FYI.

Quote:
Differences in competency and cabinet-level leadership between H.W. Bush and W. Bush as well re: Middle-East policy.


Very true. But I jest! The people in the current administration have, in fact, done their jobs quite well, with the exception of the execution of the war. Getting into it? A+. Creating a fearful and timid congress? Off the scale. Creating a fearful and timid people? Formerly off the scale, now about a B+. Rigging the electoral process? Off the scale. Draining the coffers of the country and the middle class into the pockets of the wealthy? Off the scale. Getting hold of the Iraqi Oil? Incomplete.

Let us get back to Cheney more directly. Iraq, by the description given in that video, backed by the reality since invasion, was going to be a quagmire. Since we know, and they knew, Iraq had no relationship to terrorism or 9/11, and it was going to be a quagmire by *beep*'s very own assessment, why in the name of all that is, ever was and will be did they go in there?

Answer me this, friend. And do so with neither the spin nor an apologist's extreme twists of logic and truth.


Iraq had no relationship to terrorism?

Funding suicide bombers

Trying to kill an American president

Abu Nidal

Anyway


If mideast regimes and elties stop teaching hate and inciting violence then they were be a lot less terrorists.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keane



Joined: 09 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Iraq had no relationship to terrorism?


Sloppy of me. He had no relationship to the terrorism he was accused of being related to, AQ. This you know.

Got anything to say on the topic? That is, on Cheney's two faces on the issue and what changed so much between '94 and '03 in Iraq?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was this event called 9-11 which showed that the mideast as it was was a threat to the US.

It also showed that that the US could not contain Saddam , Iran AND pressure Saudi Arabia on Al Qaeda at the same time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sundubuman



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

keane wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Iraq had no relationship to terrorism?


Sloppy of me. He had no relationship to the terrorism he was accused of being related to, AQ. This you know.

Got anything to say on the topic? That is, on Cheney's two faces on the issue and what changed so much between '94 and '03 in Iraq?


Are you that ignorant of the breaking down of the sanctions? Oil-for-food scandal...the fact that Russian, French and German interests were salivating to end the sanctions and take advantage of their relationship with the madman and his oil???

And that Saddam was paying money to suicide bombers in Israel? Bombers who killed, in addition to Israelis, people from over a dozen nations...

None of this could possibly influence an intelligent person's thinking on the issue in the intervening years? In a post 9-11 world (and btw, something people forget, Saddam's state run media was ordered to play celebratory music after the 9-11 attacks. As far as I know, the only government run media in the world to do so on tht day (unless the Taliban had a TV station?)

For this alone, IMHO, the invasion was more than justified.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
keane



Joined: 09 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sundubuman wrote:
Are you that ignorant of the breaking down of the sanctions?

Perhaps I am misunderstanding you, but you are saying that Cheney's line of thought was:

The sanctions aren't killing people fast enough nor driving out Saddam, so let's bomb them into 1500?

Quote:
Oil-for-food scandal...the fact that Russian, French and German interests were salivating to end the sanctions and take advantage of their relationship with the madman and his oil???


How would this affect US security? Also, you'll get nowhere with me on crying about the sanctions being broken: all they did was kill innocent Iraqis. They were ill-conceived and wrong.

Quote:
And that Saddam was paying money to suicide bombers in Israel? Bombers who killed, in addition to Israelis, people from over a dozen nations...


Then we are justified in attacking Palestine, Iran, Afghanistan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and many other nations.

Why aren't we? What made Iraq so special?

Quote:
None of this could possibly influence an intelligent person's thinking on the issue in the intervening years?


So Dick was thinking:

He's done so many bad things he's been doing for so long!! Suddenly, I just can't take it any more! He must go. Now! But, (snicker) let's blame him for 9/11, claim he has lots of bombs and chemical weapons. It'll be a laugh riot! It'll still be a quagmire, but who cares? The Mid-East is still the prize!

This is your defense?

Quote:
In a post 9-11 world (and btw, something people forget, Saddam's state run media was ordered to play celebratory music after the 9-11 attacks. As far as I know, the only government run media in the world to do so on tht day (unless the Taliban had a TV station?)

For this alone, IMHO, the invasion was more than justified.


Damnit! You're right!! To hell with freedom of speech! To hell with sovereignty! They mock us? Kill them!


I suspect you and I will have little to discuss. I prefer rational discourse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some think that the US has no right to force mideast regimes and eties to stop teaching hate , inciting violence funding Al Qaedia and planning terror.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keane



Joined: 09 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Some think that the US has no right to force mideast regimes and eties to stop teaching hate , inciting violence funding Al Qaedia and planning terror.


So, about Cheney's two faces on the quagmire...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

could not contain Saddam and pressure Saudi on AQ at the same time.

Business as usual in the mideast was dangerous to the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keane



Joined: 09 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
could not contain Saddam and pressure Saudi on AQ at the same time.

Business as usual in the mideast was dangerous to the US.


You said that already. I find it an insufficient justification for the deaths of 100,000 to 700,000 human beings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

just another day wrote:

Quote:
maybe he's just quiet nowadays because he's a puppet?


Gee, now I'm confused, too. I thought leftists believe that Bush is Cheney's puppet? It's so difficult keeping up with leftist logic.

keane (sock of EFLT) wrote:

Quote:
Got anything to say on the topic? That is, on Cheney's two faces on the issue and what changed so much between '94 and '03 in Iraq?


Why, don't you know? Are you outside the loop? During that crucial period the Internet greatly expanded and Dave's ESL Cafe emerged as a leading site for those in the ESL/EFL profession. Mr. Sperling's influence became so widespread that it did not go unnoticed even by the Texas Mafia. The White House requested that out of deference to the VP, that his complete name, Dick Cheney, not be used on these forums.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International