|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
meangradin

Joined: 10 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:18 pm Post subject: Grammar question |
|
|
"Scarcely a day passes without (Tom) seeing a traffic accident"
When I start a sentence with an adverb, does the subject have to follow? I believe I could place an aux. verb such as "does" after the adverb, then the subject (of course, changing the main verb to the bare infinitive form - "pass").
Can I also place the main verb after the adverb? eg. "Scarcely passes a day with out Tom seeing a trafiic accident."
The latter seems awkward to me.
Why do Korean grammar books have to be so complicated? Personally, I don't think think middle school grammar books should teach this structure as it is to complicated.
Does anyone know the rules that apply?
Thanks,
Craig |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:33 pm Post subject: Re: Grammar question |
|
|
meangradin wrote: |
"Scarcely a day passes without (Tom) seeing a traffic accident"
When I start a sentence with an adverb, does the subject have to follow? I believe I could place an aux. verb such as "does" after the adverb, then the subject (of course, changing the main verb to the bare infinitive form - "pass").
Can I also place the main verb after the adverb? eg. "Scarcely passes a day with out Tom seeing a trafiic accident."
The latter seems awkward to me.
Why do Korean grammar books have to be so complicated? Personally, I don't think think middle school grammar books should teach this structure as it is to complicated.
Does anyone know the rules that apply?
Thanks,
Craig |
Negative adverbs of frequency (e.g., never, rarely, seldom, scarcely (ever), hardly ever) can be placed in sentence initial position with inversion of the auxiliary verb (inserting 'do', if necessary) and the subject. See pages 506-507 of M. Celce-Murcia and D. Larsen-Freeman's The Grammar Book (2nd Ed.).
I agree with you that this should not be part of the middle school language curriculum. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|