View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:17 am Post subject: The forklift vs the microphone |
|
|
http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2007/07/leamer_on_outso.html
An interesting way of looking at technologies. Some technology is like a forklift. It makes everyone more productive. The microphone technologies are more interesting. They let more talented people reach larger audiences/markets, although they reduce the number of jobs in the field.
For example, before the stereo, one could be a professional musician and play in a band at weddings. You could make a good living. Every town supported a goodly number of wedding bands. But then stereo equipment allowed DJs to exist. Now instead of Murph and the Murphtones doing all your wedding favorites, you can have David Bowie and handful of greats sing at your wedding.
So some technologies reduce people in that field but they have the benefit of bringing the best to us at low cost. David Bowie live would cost you. But you can have David Bowie for the price of a few dollars and technology. Microphone technologies reduce the number of people in the field, down to the most talented, but brings vast wealth to the most talented. And arguably the quality of your life improves when you can have David Bowie to listen to and not Murph and the Murphtones.
Of course a DJ is cheaper than a whole band. The money you save on the band you then spend on something else. While the sax player loses out, the flower guy gains and then hires more people.
Another example is Hollywood. Before you had live plays, operas. If you were in Italy, well, bonus. But if you were in Windsor, Ontario, you're not getting good opera. However, the movie camera pretty much destroyed live theater and other forms of live entertainment. However, everyone can enjoy Star Wars. Think how much richer your life is. Again, a handful of actors gain vast wealth. But instead of paying $60 to see the opera, you now pay $10 to see a movie. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
knee-highs

Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Location: yes
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most boring post I ever read. Please find your camera. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Most boring post I ever read. Please find your camera.
|
A less than dazzling retort on your part.
Another aspect: Movies created a new 'celebrity culture'. Before movies, writers were the 'pop icons' of the day. Di(kens and Twain, among others, toured, much like a rock band does today.
Somehow, the doings of Paris and Britney are a cut or two below what our great-grandparents had. Sad, really.
Vaccuum sweepers and washing machines have taken away jobs for maids. That's probably a good thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
knee-highs

Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Location: yes
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Quote: |
Most boring post I ever read. Please find your camera.
|
A less than dazzling retort on your part.
|
agreed.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
knee-highs wrote: |
Most boring post I ever read. Please find your camera. |
Yawn. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Are they the lemmings

Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Location: Not here anymore. JongnoGuru was the only thing that kept me here.
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: Re: The forklift vs the microphone |
|
|
I thought it was interesting. But I'm not so sure about...
mindmetoo wrote: |
One could be a professional musician and play in a band at weddings[, but] then stereo equipment allowed DJs to exist. Now instead of Murph and the Murphtones doing all your wedding favorites, you can have David Bowie and handful of greats sing at your wedding. [...] Microphone technologies reduce the number of people in the field, down to the most talented |
I was in a band for ages, but we sucked mightily  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:50 am Post subject: Re: The forklift vs the microphone |
|
|
Are they the lemmings wrote: |
I thought it was interesting. But I'm not so sure about...
mindmetoo wrote: |
One could be a professional musician and play in a band at weddings[, but] then stereo equipment allowed DJs to exist. Now instead of Murph and the Murphtones doing all your wedding favorites, you can have David Bowie and handful of greats sing at your wedding. [...] Microphone technologies reduce the number of people in the field, down to the most talented |
I was in a band for ages, but we sucked mightily  |
I'm sort of giving a hypothetical example, but I would imagine being in a band isn't a day job like it used to be. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogshed

Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used to work for a warehousing software company. The forklift and other technologies in the warehousing industry have pretty much the same effect as the microphone. You use less people to do the same job. The only difference is the extent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|