Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Amtrak USA Rail Pass
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Travel Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
craigmcc1982



Joined: 07 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:08 am    Post subject: Amtrak USA Rail Pass Reply with quote

Hi All,

Well my 2nd year is coming to a close and I plan on heading to America from mid-October. I'm from the UK so this will be my first time visiting there.

I was wondering if anybody had ever used this during a tour of the US?? Details can be found at the following website:

http://www.westernair.co.uk/amtrak.html#rules

I plan on city-hopping over the course of a month and would also welcome any suggestions as to specific routes to take. I will be starting the journey from Los Angeles.

Thanks in advance for any help you guys can give
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not many choices looking at the map. On the other hand, it does hit everywhere you'd realistically want to go.

The most interesting cities on that map are San Diego, San Francisco, Portland, Seattle, New Orleans, Miami, New York, Boston and of course L.A. where you'd start.

Personally I'd focus on those cities and try to spend at least a few days in each of them.

If I were to choose several where you'd definetley want to spend more time:

San Diego: California Beach Culture and Tijuana, Mexico.
New Orleans: French Quarter!
New York City: For just about everything.
San Francisco: Chinatown, LIttle Italy, North Beach.

Uhmm.. Las Vegas is a real interesting city that should be experienced as well. Doesn't look like Amtrack goes there, but you could rent a car from Los Angeles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PGF



Joined: 27 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stay out of LA. it's our armpit.

San Diego is great. San Francisco is better.

While you are on the west coast, go up to Seattle; it's beautiful-see the redwoods, etc. Between the west and east coasts there is a lot of dirt and some mountains. If you really like that sort of thing, go see the grand canyon or the mountains in colorado or something; Oh, and if you really like corn, go to Illinois. I heard there is a city called Chicago there.

If you want to be around people, go east to NYC. Manhattan is the greatest city in the world. From there, you can go to Maine=north or Miami=way south. Amtrack is actually a really really expensive way to travel in the US.

Most US citizens opt to fly or drive themselves.

It's a very very large country with a very very diverse population. Unless you are going for a long time ie., 3 months +, I'd stick to one coast. Otherwise you'll be rushing everywhere.

Ideally, you could rent a car for three months and tool around the country. but, again, it's going to be expensive.

good luck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PGF wrote:
Amtrack is actually a really really expensive way to travel in the US.

Most US citizens opt to fly or drive themselves.

The website has some really good prices.
http://www.westernair.co.uk/amtrak.html#rules

30 days for 250 British Pounds. That's a bargain it seems to me!

I'd agree flying is a great way to get from city to city. But something beautiful about going coast to coast in the U.S. with the train windows. Plus you arrive right at the train stations downtown, as opposed to taxis from airports into the city.

I like the Amtrack idea.

(Then renting cars while visiting certain cities that are more car-oriented).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dogshed



Joined: 28 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you are really into trains then I would suggest looking into the many tourist oriented train rides in various places around the US that have restored steam locomotives. Except for some cities on the east coast trains are not the way to travel in the US.

I remember hearing about an airpass for airplanes that can be bought outside the US. The downside there is transportation from the airport. Fortunately larger cities usually have a good bus or train from the airport and most of the tourist attractions are on bus or subway routes. Anywhere else you should rent a car.

For example when I was in Dallas there was a really nice bus that took you to the city for $3. Much less than the cab fare which I think was around $30. The thing is there were lots of cab and limo ads, but nothing
to tell you about the bus.

Years ago I met a pair of brothers from Belgium. They bought a used car in Kansas, used my address to get insurance, and drove it to Florida where they abandoned it. One of the brother's was an auto mechanic who
was able to keep the beast running.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I go back home, I take the train on occasion. They're nice in theory, but after a few trips you'll probably be wishing to return to the orderliness of airports.

My biggest complaint is the on-timeness. It seems like every train I've taken in the last few years has been late - except Philly to DC. I'm not talking short delays. Minimum 3 hours up to 12+ hours on one occasion. Which is okay, if you don't mind sitting around in a train station. But if you've actually got something scheduled, it'll really screw you up. So don't rely on Amtrak to get you in and out of town on time.

The second problem is arrival and departure times. Given the nature of the beast, it's unavoidable. But check the times of the routes you want to take. If you've got a lot of 3 am arrivals or 5 am departures it'll take away from some of the fun.

The scenery can be nice, but after 10 hours it kind of losses its appeal. Okay, after more like after 30 minutes. Then again, I usually travel in the midwest. Bring books. Lots of books.

Routewise, I'd imagine that just California, Oregon, Washington, and Arizona could keep you occupied for a month. Chicago and New Orleans would be good places to visit, but at a large cost of time.

I'd suggest opting for the Western Pass, as that'll still give you everything from Chicago-New Orleans west. That'll be plenty to see in one month. If you plan your route out and check prices, you may even find it cheaper to buy something like the California pass ($159) and individual train or airplane tickets.

Have you checked Amtrak's website for pricing? It's down for maintenance right now, but they may sell the passes cheaper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
atomic42



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Location: Gimhae

PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I too prefer the train but would suggest using this wherever possible:
http://www.megabus.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
waltjocketty



Joined: 09 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

atomic42 wrote:
I too prefer the train but would suggest using this wherever possible:
http://www.megabus.com/


I took the Megabus from Chicago to St. Louis last year for a mere $5, and the ride was an hour faster than the train. Also, Greyhounds are a decidedly more interesting, but maybe dirtier, definitely sketchier, and less comfortable, way of seeing America than is Amtrak. Also, Amtrak doesn't check your luggage and Greyhounds are known to be pulled over my the police. Just something to chew on. Also, up in Oregon and western Washington, maybe even northern Cali up near Shasta and Lassen, hitchhiking is definitely an option.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
craigmcc1982



Joined: 07 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for all the replies as the information provided is certainly food for thought!

Whilst it's unavoidable that there will be some delays I feel that this trip offers significant value for money and I intend to use buses here and there to break up the monotony.

I've been working on a schedule for the last two days and I've come up with a flexible route allowing me to visit:

LA (2 days)
Houston (2 days)
New Orleans (3 days)
Washington (3 days)
NYC (3.5 days)
Chicago (2 days)
Denver (1 day) Just to get off the train!!
Salt Lake City (1 day)
Las Vegas (3 days)
San Francisco (3.5 days)

Whilst it may seem rushed, I'm sure I can see most of the places I need to and relax on the overnight trains.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dogshed



Joined: 28 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 5:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.discoverypass.com/

Here's a bus pass you can buy if you want to do that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
elliemk



Joined: 01 Jul 2007
Location: Sparkling Korea!

PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the itinerary you posted, with each place followed by my comments

LA (2 days) What do you want to do in L.A.? See Universal Studios, Disneyland, go on a tour of stars' homes by bus?

Houston (2 days) - Why Houston? You'd have a lot more fun if you just left this one off.

New Orleans (3 days) Three days in New Orleans? Well, the city is still such a mess in many ways that two days ought to suffice you just fine.

Washington (3 days) Washington, D.C., I assume? Heck, you could spend three days at the Smithsonian and not even begin to cover it all. If you're a history buff, plan on spending more time here.

NYC (3.5 days) Again, think about what you want to do here. See a Broadway show, ride by the Statue of Liberty, go to the top of the Empire State Buidling, visit the Metropolitan Museum of Art?

Chicago (2 days) - Why even bother?

Denver (1 day) Just to get off the train!! Forget the train! The scenery in Denver and surrounding area is absolutely gorgeous. There may even be snow by then, so you could do some great (though very expensive) skiing.

Salt Lake City (1 day) Why go here? To see the Mormon Tabernacle or the Great Salt Lake? Better still, arrange for a tour of the Grand Canyon and skip Salt Lake City.

Las Vegas (3 days) - You want to gamble? That's about all you'll find to do in Las Vegas. Why waste three days spending all your money - if you must go, go for one or two days at the most.

San Francisco (3.5 days) Ah, now here's your worst mistake. Plan on a week in the San Francisco Area - one night in Carmel and visit Monterey and Big Sur; one night going up the coast to see the huge Sequoia trees; one night or two (better) at Yosemite National Park; another night at a beautiful bed and breakfast on the Mendocino coast.

Anyway, are you going to look at colleges? It kind of sounds like it, because of all the variety of cities. But honestly, if you're going as a tourist, here's my recommendation:

San Francisco, New York, New Orleans - forget the rest. But that's just my recommendation. Whatever you do, have fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Elliemk - thanks for posting that, makes great discussion! I'm gonna add some comments on all your comments.

elliemk wrote:
LA (2 days) What do you want to do in L.A.? See Universal Studios, Disneyland, go on a tour of stars' homes by bus?

Hmm...I find Los Angeles fascinating. Santa Monica, Hollywood, Venice, etc. Great neighborhoods for walking around. I think its a great place for just 'hanging out' and 'exploring' without doing any kind of tourist activities. Downtown Los Angeles not so much, but those other areas, definetely yes. Two days is a good number to do just that.

elliemk wrote:
Houston (2 days) - Why Houston? You'd have a lot more fun if you just left this one off.

Agreed. Wouldn't know what a person would do in Houston. There is a SPACE MUSEUM but hardly worth it in itself. I'd give Houston a huge miss as well.

I can see the OP's interest to experience the real TEXAS. But Houston is just a monster huge city of highways, strip malls, etc. Not interesting at all.

elliemk wrote:
New Orleans (3 days) Three days in New Orleans? Well, the city is still such a mess in many ways that two days ought to suffice you just fine.

From what I understand, the French Quarter was uneffected, and still the same as ever. Tourists never went to the areas that were effected by Katrina.

I absolutely LOVE New Orleans and particularly the French Quarter. Three days would be perfect. Anything less than three days would be a shame. It's just a great place to be.

elliemk wrote:
Washington (3 days) Washington, D.C., I assume? Heck, you could spend three days at the Smithsonian and not even begin to cover it all. If you're a history buff, plan on spending more time here.

I think the OP is British? So maybe its interesting if you are into American history. I don't know, I love politics, but two days was more than enough for me with Washington DC. It's spread out and difficult to visit. Probably best to just take a full-day tour bus and get out of there. A tour bus would take you through to all the essentials, and unless you have a specific interest in the Smithsonian or love museums, then spend more time accordingly.
elliemk wrote:
NYC (3.5 days) Again, think about what you want to do here. See a Broadway show, ride by the Statue of Liberty, go to the top of the Empire State Buidling, visit the Metropolitan Museum of Art?

There is SO MUCH to do in New York City. 3.5 days is good! I lived there for 2.5 years and everyday you step out of the apartment is an interesting day.

elliemk wrote:
Chicago (2 days) - Why even bother?

Lake Michigan, etc. I'm not a big one on Chicago, but it would breakup his trip, and it is a beloved city by Chicagoans. One day would probably be fine and explore the waterfront.

elliemk wrote:
Denver (1 day) Just to get off the train!! Forget the train! The scenery in Denver and surrounding area is absolutely gorgeous. There may even be snow by then, so you could do some great (though very expensive) skiing.

I've driven around Denver, the city. Downtown is alright but can be explored in an hour or two. The rest of the city isn't that special. I do agree its the surrounding area.

This is a great place to rent a car and get into the mountains for about 2 days/1 night at least. Mountains are gorgeous around Denver. City not so special, areas around it gorgeous.

elliemk wrote:
Salt Lake City (1 day) Why go here? To see the Mormon Tabernacle or the Great Salt Lake? Better still, arrange for a tour of the Grand Canyon and skip Salt Lake City.

Salt Lake City is a weird place. The Mormon Tabernacle is bizarre and so are the people - in my opinion. I've been there a few times, and the vibe of Utah is like nothing else on earth. Mormons are just cooky people (sorry to the Mormons out there reading this, but its really different to me).

My first time in Salt Lake City was during a Basketball All-Star game and the hotel owner was complaining about sports because it encourages sports betting. Then I walked around the Mormon Tabernacle and had some of the most gorgeous international women in the world trying to convert me. It was kinda bizarre there.


elliemk wrote:
Las Vegas (3 days) - You want to gamble? That's about all you'll find to do in Las Vegas. Why waste three days spending all your money - if you must go, go for one or two days at the most.

I'd agree one or two days is enough. New Orleans has a couple casinos are they owned by same as Vegas casinos. So could get a good feel.

However, if a person is not an American, it is pretty amazing to see a city totally given over to casinos, strippers, 24-hour parties, the whole thing is fascinating for a first time visitor.

elliemk wrote:
San Francisco (3.5 days) Ah, now here's your worst mistake. Plan on a week in the San Francisco Area - one night in Carmel and visit Monterey and Big Sur; one night going up the coast to see the huge Sequoia trees; one night or two (better) at Yosemite National Park; another night at a beautiful bed and breakfast on the Mendocino coast.

I lived in San Francisco for a year. 3.5 days is about enough. I liked it of course, and some great recommendations.

--------

Anyways, this is great discussion. I LOVE traveling in the United States. I've been to 49 states and many of them multiples of times.

Gotta confirm one more time how much I love New Orleans as a city. Totally different style of music, foods, architecture and the French Quarter feels like one very large liquor shelf. Great fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
waltjocketty



Joined: 09 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

elliemk wrote:


LA (2 days) What do you want to do in L.A.? See Universal Studios, Disneyland, go on a tour of stars' homes by bus?

Chicago (2 days) - Why even bother?
.


You must be kidding me.

Have you been to LA?

Santa Monica, Venice Beach, Dodger Stadium, Kanter's Deli, The Apple Pan, Rosco's Chicken and Waffles, Spearmint Rhino, The Getty Museum, The Getty Villa, Largo, The Roxy, Griffith Park, Farmer's Market, and also Fatburger.

As for Chicago, you'll find the best diners in America, the best gyros and the best pizza. Architecture? You bet. Go up to Oak Park or just stay downtown enjoy the architecture in and around Millenium Park and throughout the awesome walk along Lake Michigan. The whole area from the Gold Coast up through Lincoln Park, Wrigleyville and Belmont is amazing. The live music on the south side and also in Lincoln Park and a couple other areas rivals the live music (blues and jazz) anywhere else in the world.

Going for a walk in Chicago on a nice day is more pleasant than in any other major city in the world. I actually love Chicago so much (though I hate the Cubs) that I can't even believe that you think there is nothing to do there. I could really spend a couple months in Chicago without ever exhausting the options.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jellypah



Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Location: ROK

PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

elliemk wrote:
Here's the itinerary you posted, with each place followed by my comments

LA (2 days) What do you want to do in L.A.? See Universal Studios, Disneyland, go on a tour of stars' homes by bus?

Houston (2 days) - Why Houston? You'd have a lot more fun if you just left this one off.

New Orleans (3 days) Three days in New Orleans? Well, the city is still such a mess in many ways that two days ought to suffice you just fine.

Washington (3 days) Washington, D.C., I assume? Heck, you could spend three days at the Smithsonian and not even begin to cover it all. If you're a history buff, plan on spending more time here.

NYC (3.5 days) Again, think about what you want to do here. See a Broadway show, ride by the Statue of Liberty, go to the top of the Empire State Buidling, visit the Metropolitan Museum of Art?

Chicago (2 days) - Why even bother?

Denver (1 day) Just to get off the train!! Forget the train! The scenery in Denver and surrounding area is absolutely gorgeous. There may even be snow by then, so you could do some great (though very expensive) skiing.

Salt Lake City (1 day) Why go here? To see the Mormon Tabernacle or the Great Salt Lake? Better still, arrange for a tour of the Grand Canyon and skip Salt Lake City.

Las Vegas (3 days) - You want to gamble? That's about all you'll find to do in Las Vegas. Why waste three days spending all your money - if you must go, go for one or two days at the most.

San Francisco (3.5 days) Ah, now here's your worst mistake. Plan on a week in the San Francisco Area - one night in Carmel and visit Monterey and Big Sur; one night going up the coast to see the huge Sequoia trees; one night or two (better) at Yosemite National Park; another night at a beautiful bed and breakfast on the Mendocino coast.

Anyway, are you going to look at colleges? It kind of sounds like it, because of all the variety of cities. But honestly, if you're going as a tourist, here's my recommendation:

San Francisco, New York, New Orleans - forget the rest. But that's just my recommendation. Whatever you do, have fun.


Honestly. Your posts bounce between largely negative, to school marmish waggy finger advice-ish, to idiot help-me-ish.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hari seldon



Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Location: Incheon

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try to include the Grand Canyon on your itinerary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Travel Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International